GOP donors looking for candidates who are not "totally crazy". Not my words.

R

rdean

Guest
Billionaire mogul Sheldon Adelson looks for mainstream Republican who can win in 2016 - The Washington Post

“He doesn’t want a crazy extremist to be the nominee,” Chaltiel said. “He wants someone who has the chance to win the election, who is reasonable in his positions, who has convictions but is not totally crazy.”

Adelson, who is worth an estimated $37.9 billion, according to Bloomberg, is a staunch supporter of Israel. He has expressed little interest in some of the social issues that motivate the GOP base. But he is driven by what he has said he sees as Obama’s socialist agenda. He is a fierce opponent of organized labor and is currently embroiled in a fight to ban online gambling.

(We know why he doesn't want on line gambling, he owns lots of casinos. He wants to turn that 38 billion into a hundred and 38 billion.)

You gotta admit the GOP's biggest donor spent a hundred million on people he probably thinks are totally crazy. Shows what America means to him.
 
It's so cute when liberals worry over Gop donors

while overlooking their own party charging 30,000 for a plate of food at a wealthy Democrat fundraiser

but when you have nothing else and they only care it's the other doing it...that to me is a loyal subject to a party
 
Gotta act crazy to get the conservatives to love you, a rational kind of normal person stands no chance. The country is full of rather generic white guys in suits, gotta have that certain something, that attractive psychosis that makes you stand out from the crowd and proudly say "If elected I promise to close down the FEMA death camps", also a nice pair of knockers helps tremendously.
 
Gotta act crazy to get the conservatives to love you, a rational kind of normal person stands no chance. The country is full of rather generic white guys in suits, gotta have that certain something, that attractive psychosis that makes you stand out from the crowd and proudly say "If elected I promise to close down the FEMA death camps", also a nice pair of knockers helps tremendously.



YAWN
more abject stupidity from a left-wing idiot.

a charge of craziness from an idiot that considers record welfare and food stamps on Progressive's watch to be "forward progress" is meaningless
 
Gotta act crazy to get the conservatives to love you, a rational kind of normal person stands no chance. The country is full of rather generic white guys in suits, gotta have that certain something, that attractive psychosis that makes you stand out from the crowd and proudly say "If elected I promise to close down the FEMA death camps", also a nice pair of knockers helps tremendously.



YAWN
more abject stupidity from a left-wing idiot.

a charge of craziness from an idiot that considers record welfare and food stamps on Progressive's watch to be "forward progress" is meaningless

Republicans will walk right by a reasonable candidate to throw their panties at a nutball, Still like Bachman for prez?
 
Gotta act crazy to get the conservatives to love you, a rational kind of normal person stands no chance. The country is full of rather generic white guys in suits, gotta have that certain something, that attractive psychosis that makes you stand out from the crowd and proudly say "If elected I promise to close down the FEMA death camps", also a nice pair of knockers helps tremendously.



YAWN
more abject stupidity from a left-wing idiot.

a charge of craziness from an idiot that considers record welfare and food stamps on Progressive's watch to be "forward progress" is meaningless

Republicans will walk right by a reasonable candidate to throw their panties at a nutball, Still like Bachman for prez?


yea nutballs; you mean like alan grayson?

ur a joke
 
Billionaire mogul Sheldon Adelson looks for mainstream Republican who can win in 2016 - The Washington Post

“He doesn’t want a crazy extremist to be the nominee,” Chaltiel said. “He wants someone who has the chance to win the election, who is reasonable in his positions, who has convictions but is not totally crazy.”

Adelson, who is worth an estimated $37.9 billion, according to Bloomberg, is a staunch supporter of Israel. He has expressed little interest in some of the social issues that motivate the GOP base. But he is driven by what he has said he sees as Obama’s socialist agenda. He is a fierce opponent of organized labor and is currently embroiled in a fight to ban online gambling.

(We know why he doesn't want on line gambling, he owns lots of casinos. He wants to turn that 38 billion into a hundred and 38 billion.)

You gotta admit the GOP's biggest donor spent a hundred million on people he probably thinks are totally crazy. Shows what America means to him.

Using some liberal logic (sic). If this is true then what he stands for is the direct opposite of what I read liberals support. Thus if he is looking for a candidate that supports his views then liberals shouldn't be using him as some sort of measure of what is normal. Obviously those he says are crazy hold views more in line with liberal thinking. And that is exactly who was nominated for President by the RNC in the last two elections. But that is why we lost. We need a Reagan not pretenders.
 
YAWN
more abject stupidity from a left-wing idiot.

a charge of craziness from an idiot that considers record welfare and food stamps on Progressive's watch to be "forward progress" is meaningless

Republicans will walk right by a reasonable candidate to throw their panties at a nutball, Still like Bachman for prez?


yea nutballs; you mean like alan grayson?

ur a joke

He's running for president? News to me. It's one thing to be a nutty rep, both parties have them and they serve a purpose but you guys run them for higher office just because they say things that make liberals mad. Quit trolling the country with nuts, the ability to make people's jaws drop at the craziness of the rhetoric is hardly a good leadership trait.
 
Republicans will walk right by a reasonable candidate to throw their panties at a nutball, Still like Bachman for prez?


yea nutballs; you mean like alan grayson?

ur a joke

He's running for president? News to me. It's one thing to be a nutty rep, both parties have them and they serve a purpose but you guys run them for higher office just because they say things that make liberals mad. Quit trolling the country with nuts, the ability to make people's jaws drop at the craziness of the rhetoric is hardly a good leadership trait.

speaking of nutballs. oh you want to confine it to dems that have run for president?
how about the current inept idiot in the White House that has the legacy of RECORD WELFARE AND FOOD STAMPS?

LIKE I SAY YOU'RE A JOKE
 
IT'S HILARIOUS. people who actually get their political news from Saturday Night Live trying to lecture the other Party on who is or isnt a serious candidate
 
yea nutballs; you mean like alan grayson?

ur a joke

He's running for president? News to me. It's one thing to be a nutty rep, both parties have them and they serve a purpose but you guys run them for higher office just because they say things that make liberals mad. Quit trolling the country with nuts, the ability to make people's jaws drop at the craziness of the rhetoric is hardly a good leadership trait.

speaking of nutballs. oh you want to confine it to dems that have run for president?
how about the current inept idiot in the White House that has the legacy of RECORD WELFARE AND FOOD STAMPS?

LIKE I SAY YOU'RE A JOKE

That's not the topic, the topic is a beloved by all conservative billionaire trying to find a non-psychotic conservative politician, I think it might be kind of hard based on candidate preferences. Obama has been very effective in getting elected to high office, he got there by being smart and not seeming like a potentially dangerous psychotic, you guys might want to consider that strategy for the sake of the country.
 
He's running for president? News to me. It's one thing to be a nutty rep, both parties have them and they serve a purpose but you guys run them for higher office just because they say things that make liberals mad. Quit trolling the country with nuts, the ability to make people's jaws drop at the craziness of the rhetoric is hardly a good leadership trait.

speaking of nutballs. oh you want to confine it to dems that have run for president?
how about the current inept idiot in the White House that has the legacy of RECORD WELFARE AND FOOD STAMPS?

LIKE I SAY YOU'RE A JOKE

That's not the topic, the topic is a beloved by all conservative billionaire trying to find a non-psychotic conservative politician, I think it might be kind of hard based on candidate preferences. Obama has been very effective in getting elected to high office, he got there by being smart and not seeming like a potentially dangerous psychotic, you guys might want to consider that strategy for the sake of the country.



no that isnt the topic. the topic is and always has been the inclination of left-wing losers to worry about what others are doing as the left-wing agenda crumbles and fails
 
He's running for president? News to me. It's one thing to be a nutty rep, both parties have them and they serve a purpose but you guys run them for higher office just because they say things that make liberals mad. Quit trolling the country with nuts, the ability to make people's jaws drop at the craziness of the rhetoric is hardly a good leadership trait.

speaking of nutballs. oh you want to confine it to dems that have run for president?
how about the current inept idiot in the White House that has the legacy of RECORD WELFARE AND FOOD STAMPS?

LIKE I SAY YOU'RE A JOKE

That's not the topic, the topic is a beloved by all conservative billionaire trying to find a non-psychotic conservative politician, I think it might be kind of hard based on candidate preferences. Obama has been very effective in getting elected to high office, he got there by being smart and not seeming like a potentially dangerous psychotic, you guys might want to consider that strategy for the sake of the country.


Do you really believe that Repubs want the position of President? I don't. If they won that position, they would have to offer potential solutions to problems and if they didn't work out, they would have to defend them.

It's much easier for Republican to blame their failures on somebody else. They don't want to lead. They have no leaders. They have no ideas.

Repeal health care, that'll fix everything.

What a winning proposition that sounds like. Oh, and some more tax cuts for very wealthy people. And maybe a war. Yep, that's about it.
 
speaking of nutballs. oh you want to confine it to dems that have run for president?
how about the current inept idiot in the White House that has the legacy of RECORD WELFARE AND FOOD STAMPS?

LIKE I SAY YOU'RE A JOKE

That's not the topic, the topic is a beloved by all conservative billionaire trying to find a non-psychotic conservative politician, I think it might be kind of hard based on candidate preferences. Obama has been very effective in getting elected to high office, he got there by being smart and not seeming like a potentially dangerous psychotic, you guys might want to consider that strategy for the sake of the country.


Do you really believe that Repubs want the position of President? I don't. If they won that position, they would have to offer potential solutions to problems and if they didn't work out, they would have to defend them.

It's much easier for Republican to blame their failures on somebody else. They don't want to lead. They have no leaders. They have no ideas.

Repeal health care, that'll fix everything.

What a winning proposition that sounds like. Oh, and some more tax cuts for very wealthy people. And maybe a war. Yep, that's about it.

what a joke you are too!! you say if they won the White House they would have to offer solutions and defend them if they didnt work?

you mean like the thousands of EXCUSES for the failures of obama; usually placed on the other political Party?

i swear you people are some serious nutcase projecters of your own sins!
when you idiots arent pretending you havent failed; you're blaming your failures on the Minority Party
 
seriously it's simply comical for any idiot on the Left to accuse anybody else of not wanting to lead!

Republicans have no failures to blame on others; THEY ARENT IN CHARGE; YOU GUYS ARE1

the fact that you would even post what you just did leftard is proof of my point. you made my case for me.

thanks
 

Forum List

Back
Top