Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Please explain how the kids are not being punished.
Why do I need to explain it when you explain it better than I do ... The children are the Trojan Horse ...
There's no need to invade a country and reshape the landscape with missiles and battleships ...
When you can use women and children to destroy it from the inside out without firing a shot.
.
Nor someone who is NOT AN AMERICAN CITIZEN.Problem is...if Mexico refusesYou might want to check deportation laws. It is back to country of origin not countries they passed through.If they arent Mexican you cant boot them back to to Mexico. Try to at least pretend you are knowledgable.
Of course you can if that's where they were when they tried to cross into the US. Kick em back to Mexico. Hundreds of them were in Tijuana, Mexico.
I doubt they were in Canada. Mexico is the only place they can cross into the US.
At least try to pretend you are knowledgable.
Now go back to pretending you know what you are talking about.You might want to check deportation laws. It is back to country of origin not countries they passed through.If they arent Mexican you cant boot them back to to Mexico. Try to at least pretend you are knowledgable.
Of course you can if that's where they were when they tried to cross into the US. Kick em back to Mexico. Hundreds of them were in Tijuana, Mexico.
I doubt they were in Canada. Mexico is the only place they can cross into the US.
At least try to pretend you are knowledgable.
Now go back to pretending you know what you are talking about.
Shift in thought
Over the past year, some US politicians have talked up the idea of returning foreigners without legal documentation to the 'territory from which they came,' whether or not that's their home. Mexico could bear the brunt, but assessments of its asylum system vary.
Seems maybe you should pretend you know what you are talking about.
Good story here. Mexico is issuing humanitarian visas.
I think it quite possible that these south Americans can be returned to Mexico.
You may be right and I may be right. Only time will tell.
As US tightens stance on migrants and refugees, is Mexico prepared to take more?
Very different. If a parent is determined to be the sole caretaker of a deoendent a judge will often not incarcerate them until sentencing psrticularly when it is a minor offense. Now obviously that wouldn't apply to someone considered dangerous.No different than American children who's parents goto jail.Please explain how the kids are not being punished.So punish the children to get at the parents. Typical RWNJ reasoning.
The Trojan Horse has been around a lot longer than President Trump ...
.
.
.
Your bleeding heart is not relevant to THE LAW
Ryan not comfortable with separating parents, kids at border
How cute.....Sanders quotes a book that trump never reads....
"Two Corinthians"
trump and Magoo are an embarrassment.....
Isn't it funny how a country can care more about an illegal family being separated who knows this going into it and has the choice to simply not come here, but not nearly so much concern when it is employed against its own citizens, such as when the children are taken from their parents for the stupidest of reasons such as letting their kids walk home from the park just down the road coming home to eat.
They are JUST AS MUCH IN THIS COUNTRY ILLEGALLY as their parents are. They can stay confined until their parents are shipped out or a family member from their home country sends for them.Nor someone who is NOT AN AMERICAN CITIZEN.Problem is...if Mexico refusesYou might want to check deportation laws. It is back to country of origin not countries they passed through.Of course you can if that's where they were when they tried to cross into the US. Kick em back to Mexico. Hundreds of them were in Tijuana, Mexico.
I doubt they were in Canada. Mexico is the only place they can cross into the US.
At least try to pretend you are knowledgable.
Now go back to pretending you know what you are talking about.You might want to check deportation laws. It is back to country of origin not countries they passed through.Of course you can if that's where they were when they tried to cross into the US. Kick em back to Mexico. Hundreds of them were in Tijuana, Mexico.
I doubt they were in Canada. Mexico is the only place they can cross into the US.
At least try to pretend you are knowledgable.
Now go back to pretending you know what you are talking about.
Shift in thought
Over the past year, some US politicians have talked up the idea of returning foreigners without legal documentation to the 'territory from which they came,' whether or not that's their home. Mexico could bear the brunt, but assessments of its asylum system vary.
Seems maybe you should pretend you know what you are talking about.
Good story here. Mexico is issuing humanitarian visas.
I think it quite possible that these south Americans can be returned to Mexico.
You may be right and I may be right. Only time will tell.
As US tightens stance on migrants and refugees, is Mexico prepared to take more?
Very different. If a parent is determined to be the sole caretaker of a deoendent a judge will often not incarcerate them until sentencing psrticularly when it is a minor offense. Now obviously that wouldn't apply to someone considered dangerous.No different than American children who's parents goto jail.Please explain how the kids are not being punished.The Trojan Horse has been around a lot longer than President Trump ...
.
.
.
Your bleeding heart is not relevant to THE LAW
Yes. Even when someone is not an American citizen.
So this justifies punishing children by seperating them from their families instead of creating family detention areas while their cases are being heard?
They are JUST AS MUCH IN THIS COUNTRY ILLEGALLY as their parents are. They can stay confined until their parents are shipped out or a family member from their home country sends for them.Nor someone who is NOT AN AMERICAN CITIZEN.Problem is...if Mexico refusesYou might want to check deportation laws. It is back to country of origin not countries they passed through.
Now go back to pretending you know what you are talking about.You might want to check deportation laws. It is back to country of origin not countries they passed through.
Now go back to pretending you know what you are talking about.
Shift in thought
Over the past year, some US politicians have talked up the idea of returning foreigners without legal documentation to the 'territory from which they came,' whether or not that's their home. Mexico could bear the brunt, but assessments of its asylum system vary.
Seems maybe you should pretend you know what you are talking about.
Good story here. Mexico is issuing humanitarian visas.
I think it quite possible that these south Americans can be returned to Mexico.
You may be right and I may be right. Only time will tell.
As US tightens stance on migrants and refugees, is Mexico prepared to take more?
Very different. If a parent is determined to be the sole caretaker of a deoendent a judge will often not incarcerate them until sentencing psrticularly when it is a minor offense. Now obviously that wouldn't apply to someone considered dangerous.No different than American children who's parents goto jail.Please explain how the kids are not being punished.
Your bleeding heart is not relevant to THE LAW
Yes. Even when someone is not an American citizen.
So this justifies punishing children by seperating them from their families instead of creating family detention areas while their cases are being heard?
I would have done everything possible keep the families together long enough to ensure they were deposited back to the other side of the border.
If you want to appease foreign nationals by letting them into our country and grant them the ability to alter our domestic policy ...
What happens to them in the process is your fault and your problem ... Perhaps you should have thought of that crap before hand ...
.
.
No argument there. So why can't they be confined in family units? Use all those leftover FEMA trailers if you have to. Any reason why we can't use some other means rather than 100% seperation?
Please explain how the kids are not being punished.
Why do I need to explain it when you explain it better than I do ... The children are the Trojan Horse ...
There's no need to invade a country and reshape the landscape with missiles and battleships ...
When you can use women and children to destroy it from the inside out without firing a shot.
.
So this justifies punishing children by seperating them from their families instead of creating family detention areas while their cases are being heard?
That is my point. It has nothing to do with appeasing anyone. It has to do with what kind of policies we choose to use in order to maintain border control.
No argument there. So why can't they be confined in family units? Use all those leftover FEMA trailers if you have to. Any reason why we can't use some other means rather than 100% seperation?
I have no problem with letting Mexico Borrow the FEMA trailers and set up a camp in Tijuana or Juarez.
It's the least a good neighbor could do.
.
That is my point. It has nothing to do with appeasing anyone. It has to do with what kind of policies we choose to use in order to maintain border control.
The policy is that we don't simply allow people to illegally cross our border.
You ignore that policy ... Hence another reason why it's your problem.
Don't cry because your desires turned everything into a fricken mess.
.
They are JUST AS MUCH IN THIS COUNTRY ILLEGALLY as their parents are. They can stay confined until their parents are shipped out or a family member from their home country sends for them.Nor someone who is NOT AN AMERICAN CITIZEN.Problem is...if Mexico refusesShift in thought
Over the past year, some US politicians have talked up the idea of returning foreigners without legal documentation to the 'territory from which they came,' whether or not that's their home. Mexico could bear the brunt, but assessments of its asylum system vary.
Seems maybe you should pretend you know what you are talking about.
Good story here. Mexico is issuing humanitarian visas.
I think it quite possible that these south Americans can be returned to Mexico.
You may be right and I may be right. Only time will tell.
As US tightens stance on migrants and refugees, is Mexico prepared to take more?
Very different. If a parent is determined to be the sole caretaker of a deoendent a judge will often not incarcerate them until sentencing psrticularly when it is a minor offense. Now obviously that wouldn't apply to someone considered dangerous.No different than American children who's parents goto jail.
Your bleeding heart is not relevant to THE LAW
Yes. Even when someone is not an American citizen.
No argument there. So why can't they be confined in family units? Use all those leftover FEMA trailers if you have to. Any reason why we can't use some other means rather than 100% seperation?
Shelters keep women and children together.They are JUST AS MUCH IN THIS COUNTRY ILLEGALLY as their parents are. They can stay confined until their parents are shipped out or a family member from their home country sends for them.Nor someone who is NOT AN AMERICAN CITIZEN.Problem is...if Mexico refuses
Very different. If a parent is determined to be the sole caretaker of a deoendent a judge will often not incarcerate them until sentencing psrticularly when it is a minor offense. Now obviously that wouldn't apply to someone considered dangerous.
Yes. Even when someone is not an American citizen.
No argument there. So why can't they be confined in family units? Use all those leftover FEMA trailers if you have to. Any reason why we can't use some other means rather than 100% seperation?
I do not like the idea of attempting to keep whole families together-----
because it is a BIG TIME expense. Far easier and CHEAPER to pack
women into women's barracks, men into male barracks and children into
kiddie facilities. Women can keep the babies and have lots of other women around to help, Call them SHELTERS -----not jails----most of all
SHORTEN THE TIME FOR THE PROCESS------
Who's talking about letting people illegally enter? I have no issue with good border control. Try another tactic.
Shelters keep women and children together.They are JUST AS MUCH IN THIS COUNTRY ILLEGALLY as their parents are. They can stay confined until their parents are shipped out or a family member from their home country sends for them.Nor someone who is NOT AN AMERICAN CITIZEN.
Yes. Even when someone is not an American citizen.
No argument there. So why can't they be confined in family units? Use all those leftover FEMA trailers if you have to. Any reason why we can't use some other means rather than 100% seperation?
I do not like the idea of attempting to keep whole families together-----
because it is a BIG TIME expense. Far easier and CHEAPER to pack
women into women's barracks, men into male barracks and children into
kiddie facilities. Women can keep the babies and have lots of other women around to help, Call them SHELTERS -----not jails----most of all
SHORTEN THE TIME FOR THE PROCESS------
Mexico has no responsibility illegal immigration over our border - that's up to us. Just like we're not responsible for any of our people who try to leave our country and go into Canada. Or Mexico.
Mexico has no responsibility illegal immigration over our border - that's up to us. Just like we're not responsible for any of our people who try to leave our country and go into Canada. Or Mexico.
At least you are willing to acknowledge it's illegal immigration in that statement ...
You better work harder at keeping your story straight ...
.