Gunman wielded AK-47 inside Georgia school

The Left isn't going to bring about more gun control. Gunman such as this are going to do the job for them.
 
I am a gun owner but I don't think certain guns should be sold. Period. Where does it end? Nukes for everyone?

sure, why not as long as one can afford one and have it properly stored.., and have a trigger lock on it....., haaaaaaaaa ha ha :lmao:


you might be a gun owner.., but that is all you are. :up:
 
I am a gun owner but I don't think certain guns should be sold. Period. Where does it end? Nukes for everyone?

True.

The snag is determining which weapons are in ‘common use at the time’ and subject to Second Amendment protection, and those that are considered ‘dangerous and unusual’ and not entitled to protection.

The alleged shooter in this case likely had a semi-auto only AK/M clone of some type that is no more ‘dangerous’ than any other semi-auto rifle, clearly in common use, where its possession is subject to Constitutional protection.
 
Last edited:
So, what part of a gun control law would this criminal obey had there been one here in my state? None of it. Crimes with guns will still happen, and criminals like this one will pay no heed to it when he commits his dastardly act.
 
So, what part of a gun control law would this criminal obey had there been one here in my state? None of it. Crimes with guns will still happen, and criminals like this one will pay no heed to it when he commits his dastardly act.

And I wish you as a white man would go into.your community and stop this madness. Or some shit you say when blacks commit crimes.
 
So, what part of a gun control law would this criminal obey had there been one here in my state? None of it. Crimes with guns will still happen, and criminals like this one will pay no heed to it when he commits his dastardly act.

And I wish you as a white man would go into.your community and stop this madness. Or some shit you say when blacks commit crimes.

Since you pulled the race card, how's Chicago doing with its gun control laws?
 
A gunman who opened fire at a Georgia elementary school on Tuesday was armed with an AK-47 "and a number of other weapons," police said. The shooter barricaded himself in the school's front office with employees before eventually surrendering to police, DeKalb County Police Chief Cedric Alexander told reporters. The outcome could have been much different if a school office worker had not talked the gunman down.

Only 8 months after Sandy Hook, another elementary school is attacked by a heavily armed gunman. The next time we may not be so lucky.


AR-130829981.jpg&maxh=400&maxw=667



Again, school shooting terror -- but a relieved outcome

When will Congressional republicans write laws to protect all American schools from predators even getting onto the school grounds? They can write it for airports to protect the rich flyer's, they can write for government buildings to protect their own selves, but they can't seem to write it to protect America's children. Pathetic!!!
 
So, what part of a gun control law would this criminal obey had there been one here in my state? None of it. Crimes with guns will still happen, and criminals like this one will pay no heed to it when he commits his dastardly act.

And I wish you as a white man would go into.your community and stop this madness. Or some shit you say when blacks commit crimes.

First of all, I'm Native American. Second, black on black crime here in my town is literally nonexistent. I wish for you as a human being to think, stop giving into this madness you call liberalism. And for once, I wish you would make some damned sense, Zona. You really should stop blaming white people for the negative fates that befall African Americans. Did it ever occur to you that they may bring their own misfortune upon themselves?
 
A gunman who opened fire at a Georgia elementary school on Tuesday was armed with an AK-47 "and a number of other weapons," police said. The shooter barricaded himself in the school's front office with employees before eventually surrendering to police, DeKalb County Police Chief Cedric Alexander told reporters. The outcome could have been much different if a school office worker had not talked the gunman down.

Only 8 months after Sandy Hook, another elementary school is attacked by a heavily armed gunman. The next time we may not be so lucky.


AR-130829981.jpg&maxh=400&maxw=667


Again, school shooting terror -- but a relieved outcome

When will Congressional republicans write laws to protect all American schools from predators even getting onto the school grounds? They can write it for airports to protect the rich flyer's, they can write for government buildings to protect their own selves, but they can't seem to write it to protect America's children. Pathetic!!!

Did this discussion all of a sudden get too smart for you? What part of "gun control will not stop gun crime" do you not understand?
 
When will Congressional republicans write laws to protect all American schools from predators even getting onto the school grounds? They can write it for airports to protect the rich flyer's, they can write for government buildings to protect their own selves, but they can't seem to write it to protect America's children. Pathetic!!!

I cannot be sure of your tone, as this post lacks foundational clarity. So I'm going to make two separate responses, depending upon which manner you intended in this post.

1: If are you are PRO-GUN, I assume you're saying that federal government should mandate armed guards in the schools, just like they protect themselves with armed guards, and protect their government buildings with armed guards, and protect airports with armed guards and other law enforcement measures/deterrents.

2: If you are ANTI-GUN, I assume that you are retarded, because you just admitted that the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with gun (unless he voluntarily ceases his evil behavior).
 
"Gun control" does NOT = "banning guns".

Correct.

There are many regulatory measures concerning guns that are perfectly appropriate and Constitutional.

No right is absolute, including the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment, and those rights are subject to reasonable restrictions by the government, as is the case with all rights.
 
When will Congressional republicans write laws to protect all American schools from predators even getting onto the school grounds? They can write it for airports to protect the rich flyer's, they can write for government buildings to protect their own selves, but they can't seem to write it to protect America's children. Pathetic!!!

I cannot be sure of your tone, as this post lacks foundational clarity. So I'm going to make two separate responses, depending upon which manner you intended in this post.

1: If are you are PRO-GUN, I assume you're saying that federal government should mandate armed guards in the schools, just like they protect themselves with armed guards, and protect their government buildings with armed guards, and protect airports with armed guards and other law enforcement measures/deterrents.

2: If you are ANTI-GUN, I assume that you are retarded, because you just admitted that the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with gun (unless he voluntarily ceases his evil behavior).

Down here there are campus police and Resource officers in schools do they not have that up north or in GA? :confused:
 
"Gun control" does NOT = "banning guns".

Correct.

There are many regulatory measures concerning guns that are perfectly appropriate and Constitutional.

No right is absolute, including the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment, and those rights are subject to reasonable restrictions by the government, as is the case with all rights.


1/2 correct

You are right, there are many regulatory measures concerning guns that constitutional.+1

However, that doesn't mean all regulatory measures concerning guns are constitutional. +/-0, since I am not sure if you inferred that claim.

You are wrong, all rights are absolute, and only a Jury may decide whether or not you acted within your absolute rights, not even the SCOTUS can overturn a Not Guilty verdict. -1
 
When will Congressional republicans write laws to protect all American schools from predators even getting onto the school grounds? They can write it for airports to protect the rich flyer's, they can write for government buildings to protect their own selves, but they can't seem to write it to protect America's children. Pathetic!!!

I cannot be sure of your tone, as this post lacks foundational clarity. So I'm going to make two separate responses, depending upon which manner you intended in this post.

1: If are you are PRO-GUN, I assume you're saying that federal government should mandate armed guards in the schools, just like they protect themselves with armed guards, and protect their government buildings with armed guards, and protect airports with armed guards and other law enforcement measures/deterrents.

2: If you are ANTI-GUN, I assume that you are retarded, because you just admitted that the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with gun (unless he voluntarily ceases his evil behavior).

You can take approach #1, I am the most pro-2nd Amendment person on this board.

No, guns are not enough to keep a predator off the school grounds. There needs to be non-climbable fencing that can be electrically activated. Ground sensors on the perimeter, cameras, turnstiles, xray for anything entering, clearance procedures with background checks, guards that ride in with the students on buses-spend the day at school & escort them back home again. Shared safe rooms between two classrooms with communications. Bullet proof windows, steel doors with electronic locks, electronic gates to isolate a predator from running free.

When we do this then it pulls the anti gunners teeth out of the argument, but most importantly, the children will be safe and we will have our 2nd Amendment rights restored.
 
When will Congressional republicans write laws to protect all American schools from predators even getting onto the school grounds? They can write it for airports to protect the rich flyer's, they can write for government buildings to protect their own selves, but they can't seem to write it to protect America's children. Pathetic!!!

I cannot be sure of your tone, as this post lacks foundational clarity. So I'm going to make two separate responses, depending upon which manner you intended in this post.

1: If are you are PRO-GUN, I assume you're saying that federal government should mandate armed guards in the schools, just like they protect themselves with armed guards, and protect their government buildings with armed guards, and protect airports with armed guards and other law enforcement measures/deterrents.

2: If you are ANTI-GUN, I assume that you are retarded, because you just admitted that the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with gun (unless he voluntarily ceases his evil behavior).

Down here there are campus police and Resource officers in schools do they not have that up north or in GA? :confused:

We still do. There were resource officers when I was in middle school, after Columbine occurred.
 
When will Congressional republicans write laws to protect all American schools from predators even getting onto the school grounds? They can write it for airports to protect the rich flyer's, they can write for government buildings to protect their own selves, but they can't seem to write it to protect America's children. Pathetic!!!

I cannot be sure of your tone, as this post lacks foundational clarity. So I'm going to make two separate responses, depending upon which manner you intended in this post.

1: If are you are PRO-GUN, I assume you're saying that federal government should mandate armed guards in the schools, just like they protect themselves with armed guards, and protect their government buildings with armed guards, and protect airports with armed guards and other law enforcement measures/deterrents.

2: If you are ANTI-GUN, I assume that you are retarded, because you just admitted that the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with gun (unless he voluntarily ceases his evil behavior).

Down here there are campus police and Resource officers in schools do they not have that up north or in GA? :confused:

Question: Is that avatar the University of Pacific?
 
When will Congressional republicans write laws to protect all American schools from predators even getting onto the school grounds? They can write it for airports to protect the rich flyer's, they can write for government buildings to protect their own selves, but they can't seem to write it to protect America's children. Pathetic!!!

I cannot be sure of your tone, as this post lacks foundational clarity. So I'm going to make two separate responses, depending upon which manner you intended in this post.

1: If are you are PRO-GUN, I assume you're saying that federal government should mandate armed guards in the schools, just like they protect themselves with armed guards, and protect their government buildings with armed guards, and protect airports with armed guards and other law enforcement measures/deterrents.

2: If you are ANTI-GUN, I assume that you are retarded, because you just admitted that the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with gun (unless he voluntarily ceases his evil behavior).

You can take approach #1, I am the most pro-2nd Amendment person on this board.

No, guns are not enough to keep a predator off the school grounds. There needs to be non-climbable fencing that can be electrically activated. Ground sensors on the perimeter, cameras, turnstiles, xray for anything entering, clearance procedures with background checks, guards that ride in with the students on buses-spend the day at school & escort them back home again. Shared safe rooms between two classrooms with communications. Bullet proof windows, steel doors with electronic locks, electronic gates to isolate a predator from running free.

When we do this then it pulls the anti gunners teeth out of the argument, but most importantly, the children will be safe and we will have our 2nd Amendment rights restored.

I would say that an armed society is enough to prevent mass shootings, just look at the Oregon Mall, an armed citizen forced the shooter to take cover.

You are over reacting. We would have to do this for movie theaters, theme parks, oh --- everywhere where you'll find kids, in order to pull the teeth out of anti-gunners.

We live in a tragic world, that's something the Libtards don't realize, nothing can prevent tragedy, but there are measures that can reduce their frequency and effectiveness, an armed public is one of them.

Did the Aurora shooter not bypass the closer move theaters that permitted armed guests? This suggests that if all movie theaters permitted armed guests, he would have either chosen another industry to asssault (like a theme park) or abandoned the idea altogether.
 
Last edited:
I cannot be sure of your tone, as this post lacks foundational clarity. So I'm going to make two separate responses, depending upon which manner you intended in this post.

1: If are you are PRO-GUN, I assume you're saying that federal government should mandate armed guards in the schools, just like they protect themselves with armed guards, and protect their government buildings with armed guards, and protect airports with armed guards and other law enforcement measures/deterrents.

2: If you are ANTI-GUN, I assume that you are retarded, because you just admitted that the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with gun (unless he voluntarily ceases his evil behavior).

Down here there are campus police and Resource officers in schools do they not have that up north or in GA? :confused:

Question: Is that avatar the University of Pacific?

University of Florida
 

Forum List

Back
Top