Here is the left trying to tell US, how with 25 reasons we justify having guns. I have just one reason.

MSN I'll give you the one reason why, now.

Interpretation: The Second Amendment | Constitution Center Without the 2nd amendment, there wouldnt be a bill of rights for the people, as proven over and over, where once a Constitution was there for the people, where the government eventually got rid of the protecting document and then subjugated the people to said government.


Why Was Hitler Able to Dismantle the German Constitution So Easily? Joe Biden's economy (Bidenomics) is destroying peoples savings and pensions. History tends to repeat itself, when people dont study and remember history.

Uh, guy, your interpretation of German history is laughable.

First, Hitler didn't confiscate any guns. In fact, he rolled back the largely ineffective Weimar gun laws (for those considered Aryan enough which was still 95% of the population.)
 
Still kicked the Brits butt not once but twice back in the day. Then saved your sorry asses from having to eat Schnitzel for the rest of your lives.
Septic Yank clichés.

What are the 13 stripes on your flag thicko? The 13 British colonies, thicko. What happened when their asses were getting beat, thicko? The French saved their asses, thicko. So the colonies could win independence in their own.

And come to think of it, you clowns have never won a war. You are a prime example of a thick Yank. Fucking clueless, utterly fucking clueless. You've never saved anything in your life, and you're just a burger flipper in McDonalds, you fucking spastic.
 
Mikeoxenormous


A relevant thread for you.
 
Septic Yank clichés.

What are the 13 stripes on your flag thicko? The 13 British colonies, thicko. What happened when their asses were getting beat, thicko? The French saved their asses, thicko. So the colonies could win independence in their own.

And come to think of it, you clowns have never won a war. You are a prime example of a thick Yank. Fucking clueless, utterly fucking clueless. You've never saved anything in your life, and you're just a burger flipper in McDonalds, you fucking spastic.
The 13 states that went to war over a ass hole king who just couldnt get enough. Today you fuckers still kneel to the brats of that king. And you say we are clueless. I laugh at how stupid you inbred bucktooth islanders are.
 
Septic Yank clichés.

What are the 13 stripes on your flag thicko? The 13 British colonies, thicko. What happened when their asses were getting beat, thicko? The French saved their asses, thicko. So the colonies could win independence in their own.

And come to think of it, you clowns have never won a war. You are a prime example of a thick Yank. Fucking clueless, utterly fucking clueless. You've never saved anything in your life, and you're just a burger flipper in McDonalds, you fucking spastic.
You need to learn your own history. The Crown hired 30,000 Hessian (German) mercenaries to fight against the almost exclusively local American forces. In 1778 there were 27,951 actual British troops fighting in the Colonies to bolster the 30,000 Hessians. The British couldn't get any of their capable officers to command in North America, for instance, Sir William Howe was 111th in seniority of British generals when he was picked for command, no one senior to him would accept the post. French army direct support was always small, in the Siege of Savannah, only 3,000 French troops were deployed. The French landed 6,000 troops at Newport, who mostly sat around and took no offensive operations. They were finally committed to combat in the Siege of Yorktown with four thousand reinforcements making up half of the besieging force. French forces never amounted to even a half of the Hessian force, and a quarter of the Crown's total force. By mid-1780, the British were on the defensive everywhere in the colonies with most of their forces boxed up in a few cities. The rebels controlled almost all of North American below Canada.
With total command of the sea, all the British Army could do was seize and hold a few seaports. Once the French entered the war, all the British could do was shiver in their few seaports and starve.
 

Nazis' used the previously enacted gun control and registration to remove arms from their enemies when they seized power.

Which was a very small percent of the population.

The reality is that there were plenty of guns in private hands.

And no one rushed out to save his Jew neighbor or fight a heroic guerilla war.

They took those guns and fought to the last old man and little boy for their Fuhrer.

Guns don't make you free, they just make you less safe.
 
In Chicago maybe. But you love gov't and put all faith in gov't to protect, love and coddle you. That's not what was intended by the founding fathers.
I really don't care what a bunch of slave rapists 'intended'. They intended for slavery to continue and for only white male landowners to hold the franchise. We evolved above that.

My only concern is for today - does it make sense to have gun ownership to support Militias that stopped existing a century ago (when they were effectively replaced by the National Guard)?

And the sensible answer is - no. It makes no sense at all, especially when some of those "well-regulated militia" include Awake the Rapper, Joker Holmes, and Adam Lanza.
 
Which was a very small percent of the population.

The reality is that there were plenty of guns in private hands.

And no one rushed out to save his Jew neighbor or fight a heroic guerilla war.

They took those guns and fought to the last old man and little boy for their Fuhrer.

Guns don't make you free, they just make you less safe.
there were few guns in private hands and jews were largely slaughtered without a fight

Weare better

Guns make you free not less safe

That is realiuty AND FACT dumbass
 
there were few guns in private hands and jews were largely slaughtered without a fight

Weare better

Guns make you free not less safe

That is realiuty AND FACT dumbass

Actually, there were lots of guns floating around.

Here's an ugly secret. Most of the Jews of Germany and Austria survived the war. They were able to get out before the war started, or they were considered "German enough" to be spared.

Most of the Jews who were killed were in either countries the Nazis overran, or countries that allied themselves with the Nazis. The biggest group came from Poland, where 3 million Polish Jews (and 3 million non-Jewish Poles) were killed during the war.

Hey, the Poles did make attempts to resist the Nazis with Guns, such as the Warsaw Ghetto uprising. They managed to kill a whopping 19 Germans before 52,000 of them were killed and the rest sent to the camps.

Guns are useless when the other guys have tanks.
 
Actually, there were lots of guns floating around.

Here's an ugly secret. Most of the Jews of Germany and Austria survived the war. They were able to get out before the war started, or they were considered "German enough" to be spared.

Most of the Jews who were killed were in either countries the Nazis overran, or countries that allied themselves with the Nazis. The biggest group came from Poland, where 3 million Polish Jews (and 3 million non-Jewish Poles) were killed during the war.

Hey, the Poles did make attempts to resist the Nazis with Guns, such as the Warsaw Ghetto uprising. They managed to kill a whopping 19 Germans before 52,000 of them were killed and the rest sent to the camps.

Guns are useless when the other guys have tanks.
No there were not

Your claims are laughable. Yes those who left before the war tended to survivie the war. Those who stated did not.

it does not matter where they were killed they were killed under the nazis with no ability to fight back.

your geographic lesson is an attempt to evade that fact. A FEW polish jews made such an attempt and died like men not animals. It was not a general resistance movement from all poles or jews as you iimply

Unarmed people are easily enslaved and sliuightered armed people are not regardless of tanks. History proves that fact

As usual you prove that you are completely ignorant and know nothing about history
 
No there were not

Your claims are laughable. Yes those who left before the war tended to survivie the war. Those who stated did not.

it does not matter where they were killed they were killed under the nazis with no ability to fight back.

your geographic lesson is an attempt to evade that fact. A FEW polish jews made such an attempt and died like men not animals. It was not a general resistance movement from all poles or jews as you iimply

Unarmed people are easily enslaved and sliuightered armed people are not regardless of tanks. History proves that fact

As usual you prove that you are completely ignorant and know nothing about history

Again, guns don't promise freedom.

The worst regimes in History were enthusiastically supported by people no worse than you are.

The very fact that half the country is perfectly willing to vote for Trump despite the utter fail of his first term shows that democracy and freedom are always at best, tenuous proposition.

"Um, yeah, I know Trump is a fascist, but $4.00 gasoline!!!"
 
Again, guns don't promise freedom.

The worst regimes in History were enthusiastically supported by people no worse than you are.

The very fact that half the country is perfectly willing to vote for Trump despite the utter fail of his first term shows that democracy and freedom are always at best, tenuous proposition.

"Um, yeah, I know Trump is a fascist, but $4.00 gasoline!!!"
No one said they promise freedom but lack of them DOES promise slavery which is why we have an amendment to protect the individual right to own them

That is what those regimes want you to believe.

Trump is no fascist and althoug I did not vote for hium he was more succesful than the current dementia patient posing as president
 
The Second Amendment was about Militias.

Militias stopped being a thing when they were replaced by National Guard.

If you want to play with guns, join the National Guard.
The second amendment was NOT about militias.

It is explicitly about individual rights and that is not arguable

You are ignorant and wrong
 
The second amendment was NOT about militias.

It is explicitly about individual rights and that is not arguable

You are ignorant and wrong
If it was so explicit, it wouldn't have taken 200 years to find that in Heller.

The Gun Lobby’s interpretation of the Second Amendment is one of the greatest pieces of fraud, I repeat the word fraud, on the American People by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime. The real purpose of the Second Amendment was to ensure that state armies – the militia – would be maintained for the defense of the state. The very language of the Second Amendment refutes any argument that it was intended to guarantee every citizen an unfettered right to any kind of weapon he or she desires. - Warren Burger
 

Forum List

Back
Top