Hillary on difference between socialism and a democrat

Votto

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2012
56,448
57,206
3,605


The moonbats keep getting worse every day. Hillary is asked what the difference is between a socialist moonbat and a Progressive Democrat moonbat.. She keeps rambling on about how she is not a socialist because "people need to work together to solve problems". So I take this to mean that socialists don't "work together to solve problems"

This is not even coherent for moonbats, or is it?

Tell us moonbats.
 
Pure systems of either socialism or capitalism are bad.

Social democracy is the system used by nearly all of the first world. It has a public sector, regulations, anti-trust laws and at times a central ablity to invest within the society at the government level.

Sorry, but your idea of capitalism is as scary as pure socialism.
 
Pure systems of either socialism or capitalism are bad.

Social democracy is the system used by nearly all of the first world. It has a public sector, regulations, anti-trust laws and at times a central ablity to invest within the society at the government level.

Sorry, but your idea of capitalism is as scary as pure socialism.
Even Marx said that would fail.
You fail.
 
The moonbats keep getting worse every day. Hillary is asked what the difference is between a socialist moonbat and a Progressive Democrat moonbat.. She keeps rambling on about how she is not a socialist because "people need to work together to solve problems". So I take this to mean that socialists don't "work together to solve problems"

This is not even coherent for moonbats, or is it?

Tell us moonbats.

"You know, I get accused of being kind of moderate and center," Clinton told the audience at a Women for Hillary event in Ohio. "I plead guilty." --- Hillary Clinton, CNN, 9/15/2015
"I'm a progressive Democrat who likes to get things done and who believes…" -- Hillary Clinton, MSNBC, 1/5/2016

Just wait a couple of months and she'll be rambling on about she IS indeed a socialist, especially if Bernie wins Iowa and/or New Hampshire .....

Wait another couple of months and she'll be telling us how she's really still a Goldwater Girl.

Hillary Clinton/2016 - more faces than a town hall clock
 
Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton/2016 - more faces than two town hall clocks facing each other across the town square
 
Pure systems of either socialism or capitalism are bad.

Social democracy is the system used by nearly all of the first world. It has a public sector, regulations, anti-trust laws and at times a central ablity to invest within the society at the government level.

Sorry, but your idea of capitalism is as scary as pure socialism.

Real freedom only exists in pure capitalism.
 
Pure systems of either socialism or capitalism are bad.

Social democracy is the system used by nearly all of the first world. It has a public sector, regulations, anti-trust laws and at times a central ablity to invest within the society at the government level.

Sorry, but your idea of capitalism is as scary as pure socialism.

Real freedom only exists in pure capitalism.
Your comment is foolish unless you mean the real freedom to oppress others and keep more than their fair share of labor.
 
The difference between democrat(socialist) and sane person is the same as the difference between trade and theft.
 
Pure systems of either socialism or capitalism are bad.

Social democracy is the system used by nearly all of the first world. It has a public sector, regulations, anti-trust laws and at times a central ablity to invest within the society at the government level.

Sorry, but your idea of capitalism is as scary as pure socialism.

Pure system of socialism is a murder-fest.

Pure system of capitalism is a system that produces more wealth than any, as proven by all nations that have embraced it. No, I don't want "just a little bit of rape".


Voluntarism works for everyone, authoritarianism works... well, for the author.
 
Pure systems of either socialism or capitalism are bad.

Social democracy is the system used by nearly all of the first world. It has a public sector, regulations, anti-trust laws and at times a central ablity to invest within the society at the government level.

Sorry, but your idea of capitalism is as scary as pure socialism.

Real freedom only exists in pure capitalism.
Your comment is foolish unless you mean the real freedom to oppress others and keep more than their fair share of labor.

Oppression? What oppression?

Give us some examples of people, working in the private sector who cannot walk away from their job anytime they choose.
 
Pure systems of either socialism or capitalism are bad.

Social democracy is the system used by nearly all of the first world. It has a public sector, regulations, anti-trust laws and at times a central ablity to invest within the society at the government level.Sorry, but your idea of capitalism is as scary as pure socialism.
Pure system of socialism is a murder-fest. Pure system of capitalism is a system that produces more wealth than any, as proven by all nations that have embraced it. No, I don't want "just a little bit of rape". Voluntarism works for everyone, authoritarianism works... well, for the author.
Libertarianism is as dangerous as state control.
 
Pure systems of either socialism or capitalism are bad.

Social democracy is the system used by nearly all of the first world. It has a public sector, regulations, anti-trust laws and at times a central ablity to invest within the society at the government level.

Sorry, but your idea of capitalism is as scary as pure socialism.

Real freedom only exists in pure capitalism.
Your comment is foolish unless you mean the real freedom to oppress others and keep more than their fair share of labor.
Oppression? What oppression? Give us some examples of people, working in the private sector who cannot walk away from their job anytime they choose.
Because we live in a social market democracy and not the unfettered work of capitalism and libertarianism that you want
 
The difference between democrat(socialist) and sane person is the same as the difference between trade and theft.
Libertarian much?
If that is what it means to be logical (foreign concept to a regressive), then definitely.
Thank you very much for admitting that you are a regressive libertarian. No, we are not going back to the days of Deadwood City or even to Henry Ford's America. Your ways have failed in the past, and you won't get another chance in the future.
 
Pure systems of either socialism or capitalism are bad.

Social democracy is the system used by nearly all of the first world. It has a public sector, regulations, anti-trust laws and at times a central ablity to invest within the society at the government level.Sorry, but your idea of capitalism is as scary as pure socialism.
Pure system of socialism is a murder-fest. Pure system of capitalism is a system that produces more wealth than any, as proven by all nations that have embraced it. No, I don't want "just a little bit of rape". Voluntarism works for everyone, authoritarianism works... well, for the author.
Libertarianism is as dangerous as state control.

I just pointed out the importance of being logical. One other important thing is to be empirical. Systems based on freedom are always successes, even Somalia is in better state than the neighboring area, despite being a warhole. I know that regressive of course prefer feels to logic, reason and empiricism, because feelz are the only thing that could justify the disaster that is socialism.
 
Pure systems of either socialism or capitalism are bad.

Social democracy is the system used by nearly all of the first world. It has a public sector, regulations, anti-trust laws and at times a central ablity to invest within the society at the government level.

Sorry, but your idea of capitalism is as scary as pure socialism.

Pure system of socialism is a murder-fest.

Pure system of capitalism is a system that produces more wealth than any, as proven by all nations that have embraced it. No, I don't want "just a little bit of rape".


Voluntarism works for everyone, authoritarianism works... well, for the author.
"complete capitalism" is a wreck in many areas, such as trade. At least when you consider your nation and not a corporation.. How does losing thousands of jobs to other countries help us? Our manufacturing is up, but our jobs are down. You do the math..
"too big to fail" ring a bell?
 
The difference between democrat(socialist) and sane person is the same as the difference between trade and theft.
Libertarian much?
If that is what it means to be logical (foreign concept to a regressive), then definitely.
Thank you very much for admitting that you are a regressive libertarian. No, we are not going back to the days of Deadwood City or even to Henry Ford's America. Your ways have failed in the past, and you won't get another chance in the future.

Actually as a result of socialistic thought America's GDP growth has fallen to over half what it used to be, while government has quadrupled in size. Well done! Socialism works so well..

Oops, got to watch out with the facts and logic... scares regressives.
 
Pure systems of either socialism or capitalism are bad.

Social democracy is the system used by nearly all of the first world. It has a public sector, regulations, anti-trust laws and at times a central ablity to invest within the society at the government level.Sorry, but your idea of capitalism is as scary as pure socialism.
Pure system of socialism is a murder-fest. Pure system of capitalism is a system that produces more wealth than any, as proven by all nations that have embraced it. No, I don't want "just a little bit of rape". Voluntarism works for everyone, authoritarianism works... well, for the author.
Libertarianism is as dangerous as state control.

I just pointed out the importance of being logical. One other important thing is to be empirical. Systems based on freedom are always successes, even Somalia is in better state than the neighboring area, despite being a warhole. I know that regressive of course prefer feels to logic, reason and empiricism, because feelz are the only thing that could justify the disaster that is socialism.
Yes, I agree that your regressive libertarianism and unfettered capitalism are systems of failure. Go live in Somalia and be a war lord. You are not using logic, reason or empiricism, merely venting your emotions instead. I am glad you realize that Sassy uses ad hom tactics.

Now you have made some statement the which you can't prove. The "success" of capitalism divorced from the cultural and population "success" is not impressive. No one wants to go back to the business practices of 1910.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top