Clement
A REAL free thinker
- Mar 8, 2014
- 715
- 65
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The subject line is correct - old white men won against the women who work for them. But, this does not belong in religion because the decision has nothing at all to do with their so-called religious beliefs. If it did, the ruling would have would have included such things as blood transfusions, which the Green's religion forbids.
Make no mistake - this is about controlling women who would dare to have sex for any reason other than procreation. For the radical right wing religious nutters, that's the real issue.
The subject line is correct - old white men won against the women who work for them. But, this does not belong in religion because the decision has nothing at all to do with their so-called religious beliefs. If it did, the ruling would have would have included such things as blood transfusions, which the Green's religion forbids.
Make no mistake - this is about controlling women who would dare to have sex for any reason other than procreation. For the radical right wing religious nutters, that's the real issue.
What a sexist dumb ass.
The subject line is correct - old white men won against the women who work for them. But, this does not belong in religion because the decision has nothing at all to do with their so-called religious beliefs. If it did, the ruling would have would have included such things as blood transfusions, which the Green's religion forbids.
Make no mistake - this is about controlling women who would dare to have sex for any reason other than procreation. For the radical right wing religious nutters, that's the real issue.
What a sexist dumb ass.
The subject line is correct - old white men won against the women who work for them. But, this does not belong in religion because the decision has nothing at all to do with their so-called religious beliefs. If it did, the ruling would have would have included such things as blood transfusions, which the Green's religion forbids.
Make no mistake - this is about controlling women who would dare to have sex for any reason other than procreation. For the radical right wing religious nutters, that's the real issue.
The subject line is correct - old white men won against the women who work for them. But, this does not belong in religion because the decision has nothing at all to do with their so-called religious beliefs. If it did, the ruling would have would have included such things as blood transfusions, which the Green's religion forbids.
Make no mistake - this is about controlling women who would dare to have sex for any reason other than procreation. For the radical right wing religious nutters, that's the real issue.
What a sexist dumb ass.
Typical for a "christian" to use foul-mouthed name calling ... but, its HL that is sexist.
Or, is it men who take birth control pills now?
Fact is, if men were responsible for NOT getting pregnant, birth control pills would be free.
The subject line is correct - old white men won against the women who work for them. But, this does not belong in religion because the decision has nothing at all to do with their so-called religious beliefs. If it did, the ruling would have would have included such things as blood transfusions, which the Green's religion forbids.
Make no mistake - this is about controlling women who would dare to have sex for any reason other than procreation. For the radical right wing religious nutters, that's the real issue.
What a sexist dumb ass.
Typical for a "christian" to use foul-mouthed name calling ... but, its HL that is sexist.
Or, is it men who take birth control pills now?
Fact is, if men were responsible for NOT getting pregnant, birth control pills would be free.
The subject line is correct - old white men won against the women who work for them. But, this does not belong in religion because the decision has nothing at all to do with their so-called religious beliefs. If it did, the ruling would have would have included such things as blood transfusions, which the Green's religion forbids.
Make no mistake - this is about controlling women who would dare to have sex for any reason other than procreation. For the radical right wing religious nutters, that's the real issue.
As it deserved to. Corporations are just collections of individuals. If the individuals in charge wanna impose their religious beliefs on their subordinants, that's fair. If you don't like it, you don't have to work for those companies.