Hobby Lobby wins

Status
Not open for further replies.
As it deserved to. Corporations are just collections of individuals. If the individuals in charge wanna impose their religious beliefs on their subordinants, that's fair. If you don't like it, you don't have to work for those companies.
 
The subject line is correct - old white men won against the women who work for them. But, this does not belong in religion because the decision has nothing at all to do with their so-called religious beliefs. If it did, the ruling would have would have included such things as blood transfusions, which the Green's religion forbids.

Make no mistake - this is about controlling women who would dare to have sex for any reason other than procreation. For the radical right wing religious nutters, that's the real issue.
 
The subject line is correct - old white men won against the women who work for them. But, this does not belong in religion because the decision has nothing at all to do with their so-called religious beliefs. If it did, the ruling would have would have included such things as blood transfusions, which the Green's religion forbids.

Make no mistake - this is about controlling women who would dare to have sex for any reason other than procreation. For the radical right wing religious nutters, that's the real issue.

What a sexist dumb ass.
 
Last edited:
The subject line is correct - old white men won against the women who work for them. But, this does not belong in religion because the decision has nothing at all to do with their so-called religious beliefs. If it did, the ruling would have would have included such things as blood transfusions, which the Green's religion forbids.

Make no mistake - this is about controlling women who would dare to have sex for any reason other than procreation. For the radical right wing religious nutters, that's the real issue.

What a sexist dumb ass.

Yes, you are.
 
The subject line is correct - old white men won against the women who work for them. But, this does not belong in religion because the decision has nothing at all to do with their so-called religious beliefs. If it did, the ruling would have would have included such things as blood transfusions, which the Green's religion forbids.

Make no mistake - this is about controlling women who would dare to have sex for any reason other than procreation. For the radical right wing religious nutters, that's the real issue.

What a sexist dumb ass.

Typical for a "christian" to use foul-mouthed name calling ... but, its HL that is sexist.

Or, is it men who take birth control pills now?

Fact is, if men were responsible for NOT getting pregnant, birth control pills would be free.
 
Dear Luddly Neddite:
Why not petition Wendy Davis and Hillary Clinton to set up a model for singlepayer through the Democrat Party that can have all the reproductive freedom and support for women as wanted, without affecting prolife members of other parties?

Wouldn't that be more control in the hands of women to cut out the federal legislation and bureaucracy and just manage a system where the people are directly in charge of their own decisions, funding, policies and representation?

Thanks!

The subject line is correct - old white men won against the women who work for them. But, this does not belong in religion because the decision has nothing at all to do with their so-called religious beliefs. If it did, the ruling would have would have included such things as blood transfusions, which the Green's religion forbids.

Make no mistake - this is about controlling women who would dare to have sex for any reason other than procreation. For the radical right wing religious nutters, that's the real issue.

[MENTION=32558]Luddly Neddite[/MENTION]
how is depending on federal govt, Hobby Lobby or other employers, insurance companies,
and federal process
NOT controlling and regulating people's free choice politically through Govt?

If you want control of Govt so that it reflect the people's free choice
all laws through Govt would have to be EXACTLY what ALL PEOPLE want.

Govt includes Prolife people in with "we the people" -- you can't cut out that part from Govt.
If prolife people are going to keep OPPOSING these laws,
then you can't go through Govt that is required to include/protect these people also.

If you want to be able to have your cake and eat it too, you have to bake your own cake.

We need to find a way that doesn't lead to this snag.

So that is why i propose to go through Party, where people already
elect a platform and only members who support that platform
support that party and its systems, So there is NO opposition to
interfere with what you choose if you want these reproductive health policies.

THAT is defending free choice, not setting it up to fail by depending on govt policies to regulate it for you.
 
Last edited:
The subject line is correct - old white men won against the women who work for them. But, this does not belong in religion because the decision has nothing at all to do with their so-called religious beliefs. If it did, the ruling would have would have included such things as blood transfusions, which the Green's religion forbids.

Make no mistake - this is about controlling women who would dare to have sex for any reason other than procreation. For the radical right wing religious nutters, that's the real issue.

What a sexist dumb ass.

Typical for a "christian" to use foul-mouthed name calling ... but, its HL that is sexist.

Or, is it men who take birth control pills now?

Fact is, if men were responsible for NOT getting pregnant, birth control pills would be free.

[MENTION=32558]Luddly Neddite[/MENTION]
Isn't it sexist to make women "depend on" patriarchal govt/corporations
to manage their own choices?
 
The subject line is correct - old white men won against the women who work for them. But, this does not belong in religion because the decision has nothing at all to do with their so-called religious beliefs. If it did, the ruling would have would have included such things as blood transfusions, which the Green's religion forbids.

Make no mistake - this is about controlling women who would dare to have sex for any reason other than procreation. For the radical right wing religious nutters, that's the real issue.

What a sexist dumb ass.

Typical for a "christian" to use foul-mouthed name calling ... but, its HL that is sexist.

Or, is it men who take birth control pills now?

Fact is, if men were responsible for NOT getting pregnant, birth control pills would be free.

Every time I read something like this from a sexist woman, it makes me wonder who would want to bed down with them anyway.
 
The subject line is correct - old white men won against the women who work for them. But, this does not belong in religion because the decision has nothing at all to do with their so-called religious beliefs. If it did, the ruling would have would have included such things as blood transfusions, which the Green's religion forbids.

Make no mistake - this is about controlling women who would dare to have sex for any reason other than procreation. For the radical right wing religious nutters, that's the real issue.

Oh for Heavens sake.
They did not ban any contraceptives.
Woman still have the right to buy their own morning after pills.
 
As it deserved to. Corporations are just collections of individuals. If the individuals in charge wanna impose their religious beliefs on their subordinants, that's fair. If you don't like it, you don't have to work for those companies.

Imposing religious beliefs is exactly what they can't do. Maybe you don't understand the ruling.
 
Ludly, that's pure garbage. I don't remember you pitching in to buy me birth control pills. Was that because I am a woman and you hate women? That's what our leader said..........

Girls,
Love ya. Am one of ya. Don't want to get pregnant? Keep your legs together, or go buy some birth control pills.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top