Holy sh**!!! Comey: "If an FBI agent did what Hillary did they'd face 'severe consequences'!!??

bucs90

Gold Member
Feb 25, 2010
26,545
6,027
280
Anyone watching this shit???

Comey just got cornered and said if an FBI agent had done what Hillary did he would face "severe consequences"......then 2 minutes later said everyone would be treated equally of they committed this same crime.

He's also rewritten the law. House asked him "what does it take"???

He said that it requires 2 things: Mishandling of classified info (which he bluntly agreed Hillary did).....and INTENT.

No sir Mr. Comey. These laws do NOT require intent. Countless legal experts have declared this and the law does not say that.
 
in the 99 years since the espionage act was created, only 1 person was prosecuted for gross negligence and that person was careless and had intent to commit espionage....

It's you, who want to change the law and precedence on this issue....
 
So he admitted Hillary just got away with crimes becauae of who she is....got it.

HOLY FUCKING SHIT......THIS MOTHERFUCKER JUST SAID:

House member called him on intent. Says the statute doesn't include wilfully (intent).....he asked Comey to confirm. He confirmed.

HE THEN ASKS Comey "Is it fair to say that you just added the wilfully part to the statute"

Comey: "Yes that would be fair."

MR COMEY YOU DO NOT WRITE THE LAWS AND YOU DON'T HAVE AUTHORITY TO CHANGE THE LAW!!!!!


THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST DISGUSTING POLITICAL CORRUPTION MOMENTS I'VE EVER SEEN.
 
Anyone watching this shit???

Comey just got cornered and said if an FBI agent had done what Hillary did he would face "severe consequences"......then 2 minutes later said everyone would be treated equally of they committed this same crime.

He's also rewritten the law. House asked him "what does it take"???

He said that it requires 2 things: Mishandling of classified info (which he bluntly agreed Hillary did).....and INTENT.

No sir Mr. Comey. These laws do NOT require intent. Countless legal experts have declared this and the law does not say that.


That's not what he said. Your second-hand info is bullshit.
Here's the link to the hearing from the very beginning. Go in there and show us at the timeline where he said this:
FBI Director James Comey Testifies Hillary | Video | C-SPAN.org

Last night right wingers were babbling everywhere that Comey used the word "reckless" to describe Clintons' actions. That was not true, either. That was Paul Ryan's word. Fox started repeating it. It's how lies and misinformation gets started.
 
in the 99 years since the espionage act was created, only 1 person was prosecuted for gross negligence and that person was careless and had intent to commit espionage....

It's you, who want to change the law and precedence on this issue....

You know why so few people are charged with this shit?? BECAUSE SO FEW PEOPLE DO THIS SHIT.

This is serious shit and very very few people in the military or federal LE would dare do this shit.

Because they have honor and integrity.

Not Crooked Hillary.


But this motherfucker is actually saying "If anyone else did it they'd face severe consequences and yes....I changed the statute to fit the desired outcome"
 
Anyone watching this shit???

Comey just got cornered and said if an FBI agent had done what Hillary did he would face "severe consequences"......then 2 minutes later said everyone would be treated equally of they committed this same crime.

He's also rewritten the law. House asked him "what does it take"???

He said that it requires 2 things: Mishandling of classified info (which he bluntly agreed Hillary did).....and INTENT.

No sir Mr. Comey. These laws do NOT require intent. Countless legal experts have declared this and the law does not say that.


That's not what he said. Your second-hand info is bullshit.
Here's the link to the hearing from the very beginning. Go in there and show us at the timeline where he said this:
FBI Director James Comey Testifies Hillary | Video | C-SPAN.org

Last night right wingers were babbling everywhere that Comey used the word "reckless" to describe Clintons' actions. That was not true, either. That was Paul Ryan's word. Fox started repeating it. It's how lies and misinformation gets started.

That's EXACTLY what he said. You obviously aren't watching. I'm posting live as he says it.
 
Bottom line is anyone else would have had their security clearence suspended within hours of possible wrongdoing. She retains her Clearence a year later after it is proven she at best violated security policies.
 
in the 99 years since the espionage act was created, only 1 person was prosecuted for gross negligence and that person was careless and had intent to commit espionage....

It's you, who want to change the law and precedence on this issue....
you are way too smart to sound like such a partisan. Is she really worth it?
 
Bottom line is anyone else would have had their security clearence suspended within hours of possible wrongdoing. She retains her Clearence a year later after it is proven she at best violated security policies.

Yet it's wise to take someone like that and reward her the presidency. In the real world you get demoted for being, at best, irresponsible in the handling of government information under your position.
 
Anyone watching this shit???

Comey just got cornered and said if an FBI agent had done what Hillary did he would face "severe consequences"......then 2 minutes later said everyone would be treated equally of they committed this same crime.

He's also rewritten the law. House asked him "what does it take"???

He said that it requires 2 things: Mishandling of classified info (which he bluntly agreed Hillary did).....and INTENT.

No sir Mr. Comey. These laws do NOT require intent. Countless legal experts have declared this and the law does not say that.


Again, you misread Comey, He is open in acknowledging that Clinton is above the law.

And you are correct, Intent has no bearing on these laws. Status does though, Clinton is a party boss, the laws that govern regular Americans simply do not pertain to her.

That is the America we live in.

To go back to an America where all Americans were subject to the same law will require at least the ballot box, most likely the ammo box.
 
The statute had the word intent removed by Congress years upon years ago, yet he said the DOJ still requires intent when prosecuting. Ridiculous.
Anyone watching this shit???

Comey just got cornered and said if an FBI agent had done what Hillary did he would face "severe consequences"......then 2 minutes later said everyone would be treated equally of they committed this same crime.

He's also rewritten the law. House asked him "what does it take"???

He said that it requires 2 things: Mishandling of classified info (which he bluntly agreed Hillary did).....and INTENT.

No sir Mr. Comey. These laws do NOT require intent. Countless legal experts have declared this and the law does not say that.
 
in the 99 years since the espionage act was created, only 1 person was prosecuted for gross negligence and that person was careless and had intent to commit espionage....

It's you, who want to change the law and precedence on this issue....


So, you support one law for commoners, and a VERY different law for the ruling elite?

Did Hillary lie to the FBI?

Yes, or no?
 
HOLY FUCKING SHIT......THIS MOTHERFUCKER JUST SAID:

House member called him on intent. Says the statute doesn't include wilfully (intent).....he asked Comey to confirm. He confirmed.

HE THEN ASKS Comey "Is it fair to say that you just added the wilfully part to the statute"

Comey: "Yes that would be fair."

MR COMEY YOU DO NOT WRITE THE LAWS AND YOU DON'T HAVE AUTHORITY TO CHANGE THE LAW!!!!!


THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST DISGUSTING POLITICAL CORRUPTION MOMENTS I'VE EVER SEEN.

Welcome to Obama's America. This is what we have become.

And some people celebrate it.
 
So he admitted Hillary just got away with crimes becauae of who she is....got it.

No. More like her position as sec of state . The rules for the head of the FBI are not the same for some FBI agent .
 
The Great Subjugator, Abraham Lincoln, would set about an attempt to bypass the Constitution, and declare slaves in certain states free, 1863. He would be re-elected, it being fairly murky just exactly by whom. Congress would eventually amend the Constitution. Paid elected office holders, like Speaker Ryan--even in 2016--would contend that "freedom" meant subjecting the former slaves to the Moses Atrocity. That is the subjugation of the foreign, outlined in Deuteronomy 23:19-20. In the New Testament, the outcome was presented for all to see, Matthew 25:14-30. The rich got richer, the poor didn't get enough, and so got cast back into potential subjugation. Mohammed would later straight-out prohibit wealth from "Riba," interest-rate usury. Adam Smith later on proposed that actually it be regulated--clearly with the New Testament outcome intended. This would be called, "Enlightened Self-Interest," aka "Terrorism. Therein is stated the complete history and agenda of the Republican Party.

The United States tends to reward the misguided with high office fairly routinely, in actual fact.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(White Eyes try to harm other peoples, claiming little marks on paper are really sacred words. Only noted is that many do often succeed, and many actually fail completely--especially in the Atlantic City casino business!)
 
So he admitted Hillary just got away with crimes becauae of who she is....got it.

No. More like her position as sec of state . The rules for the head of the FBI are not the same for some FBI agent .

WRONG.

You just said the laws don't apply to the FBI head the same way they do to an FBI newbie. WRONG WRONG WRONG.

The law is the law.

And once again....we're seeing the left supporting a lawless society....a banana republic style government where the law is only there to throw at the people they want.
 

Forum List

Back
Top