Lonestar_logic
Republic of Texas
- May 13, 2009
- 24,539
- 2,233
- 205
why is it every right leaning person I deal with is dishonest?
You want to see dishonesty?
Look in the mirror.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
why is it every right leaning person I deal with is dishonest?
why do you ignore what Democrats have done to fuck people?......like the Gays here in my State.....in public they put their arms together with the gays and tell them how much they are with them.....when voting time comes.....were the hell were they?.....not once,but twice....why do you ignore what the republicans have done?
it is court documented yet you pretend it doesnt exsist
why do you ignore what the republicans have done?
it is court documented yet you pretend it doesnt exsist
Who the fuck started the thread you fucking idiot.
I STARTED IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
why is it every right leaning person I deal with is dishonest?
why is it every right leaning person I deal with is dishonest?
why cant you say that the Democratic party is just as crooked as the Republicans?.........could it be because your not only dishonest.....but somewhat stupid?....
Are democrats dishonest?Because that isnt true
Because that isnt true
why do you ignore what Democrats have done to fuck people?......like the Gays here in my State.....in public they put their arms together with the gays and tell them how much they are with them.....when voting time comes.....were the hell were they?.....not once,but twice....why do you ignore what the republicans have done?
it is court documented yet you pretend it doesnt exsist
Why do we have such a huge ass population that doesn't know the difference between there, their and they're.
Unfortunately a big chunk of them are anti-intellectuals.
because its meaninless bullshit.
content is what is important here not spelling.
Take it to a english class
look I dont give a flying rats ass about spelling LL.
Shove your head up your ass and teach your ass to spell.
I am here to discuss politics and you are here to divert attention from this thread.
Yoiu are the scum of the earth.
Go cash your check from the republican party and let us AMERICANS discuss the fact that your employer is a cabal of shit heads deterimined to DROWN this country in the bathtub.
look I dont give a flying rats ass about spelling LL.
Shove your head up your ass and teach your ass to spell.
I am here to discuss politics and you are here to divert attention from this thread.
Yoiu are the scum of the earth.
Go cash your check from the republican party and let us AMERICANS discuss the fact that your employer is a cabal of shit heads deterimined to DROWN this country in the bathtub.
Why are you so up in arms anyway? It wasn't you who made the thread and the mistake.
look I dont give a flying rats ass about spelling LL.
Shove your head up your ass and teach your ass to spell.
I am here to discuss politics and you are here to divert attention from this thread.
Yoiu are the scum of the earth.
Go cash your check from the republican party and let us AMERICANS discuss the fact that your employer is a cabal of shit heads deterimined to DROWN this country in the bathtub.
Why are you so up in arms anyway? It wasn't you who made the thread and the mistake.
Look I don't give a god damn do we understand this bitch?
Proving that I don't give a damn about your opinion on how you views someones grammar mistakes? Gald I could let you know.Why are you so up in arms anyway? It wasn't you who made the thread and the mistake.
Look I don't give a god damn do we understand this bitch?
No shit, thanks for proving my point.
Proving that I don't give a damn about your opinion on how you views someones grammar mistakes? Gald I could let you know.Look I don't give a god damn do we understand this bitch?
No shit, thanks for proving my point.
As far as I'm concerned, caucuses are fraudulent in their design.
But I don't really care.
If caucuses are going to be a part of the election process they should at least be fair, if not just appoint a king or dictator to rule this country.
Let me ask you a question...after the state delegates are assembled at the National Convention, are they required by law to vote for the nominee that their state voted for? Or can they change their vote?
When it comes to the Primaries and Caucuses, it is more of an opinion poll letting our state delegates know who we'd like them to vote for...in the end, however, they can do what they want.
If caucuses are going to be a part of the election process they should at least be fair, if not just appoint a king or dictator to rule this country.
Let me ask you a question...after the state delegates are assembled at the National Convention, are they required by law to vote for the nominee that their state voted for? Or can they change their vote?
When it comes to the Primaries and Caucuses, it is more of an opinion poll letting our state delegates know who we'd like them to vote for...in the end, however, they can do what they want.
Not necessarily. After state conventions, delegates are bound. You could literally have delegates that are Paul supporters who worked their way through the process to the state convention, who could end up being bound to Romney and would have to choose him at the National.
Yes because the only reason Paul isn't winning is because of cheating. It cant possibly be because most of the country doesnt agree with him can it?
Let me ask you a question...after the state delegates are assembled at the National Convention, are they required by law to vote for the nominee that their state voted for? Or can they change their vote?
When it comes to the Primaries and Caucuses, it is more of an opinion poll letting our state delegates know who we'd like them to vote for...in the end, however, they can do what they want.
Not necessarily. After state conventions, delegates are bound. You could literally have delegates that are Paul supporters who worked their way through the process to the state convention, who could end up being bound to Romney and would have to choose him at the National.
But ONLY for the 1st round of voting. If no candidate reaches 1144 delegates, it becomes a wide open 'brokered' convention.
From my keyboard to God's ears...
Yes because the only reason Paul isn't winning is because of cheating. It cant possibly be because most of the country doesnt agree with him can it?
Funny how this has happened twice with Mitt, in Iowa and not possibly Maine... Mitt, you know, the guy you like... Maybe it's ok as long as it's the guy you like.