Homosexual marriage

In a free and democratic society all members of that society MUST have the same basic rights under the law.

Here are the facts,
A homosexual cannot marry another person of the same sex.
A non-homosexual cannot marry another person of the same sex.

A homosexual can marry a person of the opposite sex.
A non-homosexual can marry a person of the opposite sex.

Seems that they have the same basic rights under the law to me.
 

We who are not gay and are the majority don't want our communities and society to get "Freed up" by people who are dead serious about making their lifestyle just as free as those who are not gay. The more that society gets freed up the more society will devalue religion and God and instead will value anal sex and ejaculation of semen and fecal matter.[/QUOTE]


There....fixed it for ya.


Are the gays gonna get ya??? Are they gonna ejaculate freedom on you?? Plus....how can you knock puttin it in the pooper until you try it??
 
There....fixed it for ya.

Don't distort the words of the honorable, most Magnificent Charlie Bass


Are the gays gonna get ya??? Are they gonna ejaculate freedom on you?? Plus....how can you knock puttin it in the pooper until you try it??

Gays want to destroy and wipe out freedom of religion and then take people's bootyhole and promote bootyhole sex. The Bass will never and has never taken up the butt and has never put it in anyone's bootyhole.
 
There....fixed it for ya.

Don't distort the words of the honorable, most Magnificent Charlie Bass


Are the gays gonna get ya??? Are they gonna ejaculate freedom on you?? Plus....how can you knock puttin it in the pooper until you try it??

Gays want to destroy and wipe out freedom of religion and then take people's bootyhole and promote bootyhole sex. The Bass will never and has never... taken up the butt and has never put it in anyone's bootyhole.

Just because you haven't found a willing (or even unwilling) accomplice yet, doesn't mean there's not still hope, buddy... Just give it time.. Patience is a virtue, you know..
 
There....fixed it for ya.

Don't distort the words of the honorable, most Magnificent Charlie Bass


Are the gays gonna get ya??? Are they gonna ejaculate freedom on you?? Plus....how can you knock puttin it in the pooper until you try it??

Gays want to destroy and wipe out freedom of religion and then take people's bootyhole and promote bootyhole sex. The Bass will never and has never... taken up the butt and has never put it in anyone's bootyhole.

Just because you haven't found a willing (or even unwilling) accomplice yet, doesn't mean there's not still hope, buddy... Just give it time.. Patience is a virtue, you know..

Another liberal promoting sexual immorality and filth, the picture is clear indeed.
 

Don't distort the words of the honorable, most Magnificent Charlie Bass

Honorable people promote freedom and equality for all (even gays).


[/quote]

Gays want to destroy and wipe out freedom of religion and then take people's bootyhole and promote bootyhole sex. The Bass will never and has never taken up the butt and has never put it in anyone's bootyhole.[/QUOTE]

Maybe because they believe religion is attacking them via government entities. If you remove the government entity.....they will have nothing to bitch about.

The hatred you are spewing is on par with racism......

Life , liberty , and pursuit of the bootyhole.:cool:
 
Don't distort the words of the honorable, most Magnificent Charlie Bass




Gays want to destroy and wipe out freedom of religion and then take people's bootyhole and promote bootyhole sex. The Bass will never and has never... taken up the butt and has never put it in anyone's bootyhole.

Just because you haven't found a willing (or even unwilling) accomplice yet, doesn't mean there's not still hope, buddy... Just give it time.. Patience is a virtue, you know..

Another liberal promoting sexual immorality and filth, the picture is clear indeed.

That's me.. Liberal to the core.

Why's that always your standard "insult" when someone from the right points out you're a nutcase?
 
Don't distort the words of the honorable, most Magnificent Charlie Bass




Gays want to destroy and wipe out freedom of religion and then take people's bootyhole and promote bootyhole sex. The Bass will never and has never... taken up the butt and has never put it in anyone's bootyhole.

Just because you haven't found a willing (or even unwilling) accomplice yet, doesn't mean there's not still hope, buddy... Just give it time.. Patience is a virtue, you know..

Another liberal promoting sexual immorality and filth, the picture is clear indeed.

Wait ... did you just call Dis a liberal?!?!? LOLOLOLOLOLOL :cuckoo:
 
Just because you haven't found a willing (or even unwilling) accomplice yet, doesn't mean there's not still hope, buddy... Just give it time.. Patience is a virtue, you know..

Another liberal promoting sexual immorality and filth, the picture is clear indeed.

Wait ... did you just call Dis a liberal?!?!? LOLOLOLOLOLOL :cuckoo:

I think he did.....

Funny how when some people dont like someone or something ...they find reasons and ways to skirt around the Constitution to justify their cause. They don't want their rights infringed upon.....but if they believe bad enough that two people (consenting adults , violating no-ones rights) is icky or immoral....they are lesser's...and subject to limited rights.

Actually.....I think he sounds more like a liberal than anyone in this thread so far.
 
The government (States) should not recognize marriage of any kind. "Marriage" should remain a religious entity.

On the other hand, States should recognize "civil unions" which would be a legal contract between two individuals (humans age 18 and above) which would afford them all the rights and privileges that are currently seen in marriage.

The "civil union" would in no way be synonymus with love or sex, but would in essense be a business contract. The government is not in a position to authorize licenses of love and sex, but they are in the position to issue licenses to conduct business. Therefore, the union could be between man and woman, two men, two women, or even relatives if it suited the two individuals from a insurance/tax/property ownership point of view.


So I take you don't place much stock is what gay marriage opponents call preserving the sanctimony of marriage... or something like that. :D

I just think that "marriage" should remain a religious practice, while "civil union" should be a legal status. If a church decides to "marry" a gay couple, then they could be married. The state wouldn't be able to say anything about it. But in any situation, they would be allowed to be linked by civil union.
 

Forum List

Back
Top