House Republicans: Hillary Clinton committed perjury in emails testimony

[toomuchtime_]

Think about this .

You'd have to prove she knew about every one of these thousands of emails and remembered the handful that supposaably were marked secret.

No chance. Being mistaken is not equal to perjury .

So you are saying she is innocent by reason of incompetence.

No, what you and others on the right are advocating is the presumption of guilt absent evidence in support, where one must ‘prove’ his innocence.

Your contempt for the rule of law is as repulsive as your contempt for the truth.

The FBI has turned over to Congress the transcript of her interrogation and it contradicts what she told Congress under oath, so there are sufficient grounds for an indictment for perjury.

 

[TooTall]

Think about this .

You'd have to prove she knew about every one of these thousands of emails and remembered the handful that supposaably were marked secret.

No chance. Being mistaken is not equal to perjury .

So you are saying she is innocent by reason of incompetence.

In a way . She's not computer savy that's for sure .

But think about it. You would have to charge everyone who emailed her with a crime . They knew they were emailing outside the local server.

I would charge everyone with a crime that emailed her a classified document knowing that she had an illegal server.

 

[Muhammed]

Think about this .

You'd have to prove she knew about every one of these thousands of emails and remembered the handful that supposaably were marked secret.

No chance. Being mistaken is not equal to perjury .

So you are saying she is innocent by reason of incompetence.

In a way . She's not computer savy that's for sure .

But think about it. You would have to charge everyone who emailed her with a crime . They knew they were emailing outside the local server.

And she set up the server why?

She set up the server to steal from the American people.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Think about this .

You'd have to prove she knew about every one of these thousands of emails and remembered the handful that supposaably were marked secret.

No chance. Being mistaken is not equal to perjury .

So you are saying she is innocent by reason of incompetence.

In a way . She's not computer savy that's for sure .

But think about it. You would have to charge everyone who emailed her with a crime . They knew they were emailing outside the local server.

And she set up the server why?

She set up the server to steal from the American people.

Bingo...she didn't want her Clinton Foundation "deals" to be seen.