Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.That Joseph Robinette Biden, President of the United States, is impeached for abuse of power by enabling bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors, and that the following article of impeachment be exhibited to the United States Senate:
Those charges will go exactly nowhere.
Hunter Biden is not impeachable. Unless you can show specific involvement of the President (which you won’t) it will fizzle.
Even Republicans will not vote for it
wow... LOLWnat is really funny is that Republicans have drawn up Articles of Impeachment before they have even had an investigation
Kind of tips their hand
he is still tangentialHunter Biden's activity is at the heart of the entire document.
The Republicans have not taken their seats in the House yet. I don't even care if theSenate upholds the impeachment. The dims knew Trump's impeachment wasn't going anywhere either but they a re less chicken-sh#### than the Rs apparnetlyThe thing is almost two years old. I think we already know where it is going.
This document doesn't require lawyers to be written up. Neither does impeachment require a crime. So let's take this document at face value.Let me ask you a Q
Do you think lawyers, who were involved in writing up this document (see OP) do not know the law?
Please
They would not have worded things as they did without any interest in what is LEGAL and provable
Says who? The document is hazy on what they should have done. What power do you think the government has in preventing private citizens from taking jobs or paying for hookers.he is still tangential
It is the president who was involved in corruption. You libtards always want to just do anything, even sell your damn soul, assuming you still have one, for the sake of the grand old demonrat party of baby killers and corruption (insider trading, using govt office to milk the taxpayers so as to be wealthy while said taxpayers suffer the loss of their savings and [libs hope] just die already.. except that if they die, where do they get their massive $... oh, yeh.. from foreign countries)
Then answer my question. Do you think a president is accountable for his family members abusing his name?he is still tangential
It is the president who was involved in corruption. You libtards always want to just do anything, even sell your damn soul, assuming you still have one, for the sake of the grand old demonrat party of baby killers and corruption (insider trading, using govt office to milk the taxpayers so as to be wealthy while said taxpayers suffer the loss of their savings and [libs hope] just die already.. except that if they die, where do they get their massive $... oh, yeh.. from foreign countries)
When the President gets a 10% kickback for his son's corruption then the answer is yes.Then answer my question. Do you think a president is accountable for his family members abusing his name?
I'm not sure that that particular resolution from an old Congress would be valid in a new Congress. I actually don't favor impeaching Biden. I don't see what it would gain and it could, very easily, backfire - big time. It could be a case of "be careful what you wish for". If he was to be impeached, he would not be removed from office, so, what would be the point? If he was successfully removed from office (which ain't gonna happin), we get someone even worse as president. Nothing would change. Again, what would be the point? Like it or not, sleepy dementia Joe will be there for two more years, unless he has a health event. Then the voters will decide in 2024, which is getting closer and closer. And, I very highly suspect Biden will not seek re-election.The Republicans have not taken their seats in the House yet. I don't even care if theSenate upholds the impeachment. The dims knew Trump's impeachment wasn't going anywhere either but they a re less chicken-sh#### than the Rs apparnetly
wow... LOL
you really have been out in the wilderness news-wise.
CNN does a great job of creating useful idiots for the dimwit party! (cnn and Co, that is)
wow... kinda sad.. kinda feel sorry for you. If i were as uneducated and uninformed/misinformed as you are, I would likely be saying dumbass stuff like this also....
As St Francis put it
There but for the grace of God go I
There but for the grace of God and Newsmax.. Breitbart... the Blaze...
Yet you can’t actually show any money going to the PresidentWhen the President gets a 10% kickback for his son's corruption then the answer is yes.
No, I don't agree w/ a damn thing because ... GET this through your headThis document doesn't require lawyers to be written up. Neither does impeachment require a crime. So let's take this document at face value.
According to those document not just Potus but vice Potus need to be held to account for the actions of one of their family members. Even if those actions are not necessarily criminal but simply unethical.
So my question remains. Is this something you agree with?
unbelievable.. how libs sell their souls to the partyYet you can’t actually show any money going to the President
FAIL
hard-headedThen answer my question. Do you think a president is accountable for his family members abusing his name?
unbelievable.. how libs sell their souls to the party
Gee... Did your party.. WOULD your party .. I dunno... like.. DIE for you or something? die on a cross?
ha ha... You really think they give one hoot in Hell (where they are headed) about YOU?
then you are the most to be pitied
In other words you have nothing so you'll post nothing. Got it.too dumbass for me to bother responding to
exactlyWhen the President gets a 10% kickback for his son's corruption then the answer is yes.
no, in other words, you are just using words to try to bully people, words that are empty of any meaning and you know that but don't care as long as you can just bully someone until they shut upIn other words you have nothing so you'll post nothing. Got it.
The thing is, he needs to be held accountable. If he has committed crimes and the evidence says he has, then why should he be exempt from punishment while the rest of us...I'm not sure that that particular resolution from an old Congress would be valid in a new Congress. I actually don't favor impeaching Biden. I don't see what it would gain and it could, very easily, backfire - big time. It could be a case of "be careful what you wish for". If he was to be impeached, he would not be removed from office, so, what would be the point? If he was successfully removed from office (which ain't gonna happin), we get someone even worse as president. Nothing would change. Again, what would be the point? Like it or not, sleepy dementia Joe will be there for two more years, unless he has a health event. Then the voters will decide in 2024, which is getting closer and closer. And, I very highly suspect Biden will not seek re-election.
