How Long Can America Hold Out?

[PoliticalChic]

1.Those who walk around with blinders on, i.e., Democrats/Liberals, who deny what right-thinking folks recognize as clear and evident dangers, continue to pooh-pooh the warnings.

Time after time, the Right has warned about things that will come to pass if the Left has control….things that would seem crazy just a few years ago- men claiming to be women, demanding to be considered normal would be an example.

But, the Left has one agenda: destroy tradition, morality, values.

And they’re darn good at it!




2. Here’s another: warnings about the ascendancy of Islam in this country.

Will sharia be accepted as ‘law’?

No?

Definitely not?

The handwriting is on the wall:

"In a decision that Muslim legal advocates celebrated as a major win, a [United States] federal appeals court on Tuesday agreed with a lower court that blocked an Oklahoma law that would have barred state courts from considering or using Shariah law — the Islamic code of conduct." Federal court deals blow to anti-Shariah efforts - U.S. News




3. If and when the Democrats are in control.....
....well here’s the Liberal’s house organ, the Washington Post, papering the way:

“…on the whole and with legally imposed hard limitations, sharia courts, using Islamic law, can adapt to the American experience and become a part of the religious arbitration landscape of America.

Islamic courts are becoming common in North America. Muslims are building religious communities in America, and religious courts are part of the structure of many of these communities. These so-called sharia tribunals do what courts everywhere do: They provide a means for hearing and resolving disputes between members of their communities.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...america/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.d3b0262ceb1f





4. What will it take for our blind brethren to see the light?
How about this article from our sister nation, with the shape of things to come:

“Police in Scotland have arrested a man for painting “Islam is questionable” on his own house.

Arresting officers accused Graham Evans of “breach of peace” after the Edinburgh man painted “alarming” and “distressing” phrases on his own property, such as: “Islam is questionable”, “Leave Means Leave” and “Brexit”.”
WATCH: UK man arrested and held for five weeks after painting ‘Islam is questionable’ on his own house



The major political party has embraced open anti-Semites and Islamists.
Don’t imagine for a moment that it ends there.

“Left has one agenda: destroy tradition, morality, values.”

That is so stupid it’s pathetic!
STUPID traditions (slavery, male chauvinism, religion, etc) need to be revised for modern times. Eh Chic?
Or are you really a male who uses a female appearance?

Gads, are you an imbecile.

You are the hope of the left....the blind who will not see.


The Left has always been about nihilism, death and destruction.


See if you can come up with a list of ways that the Democrats/Liberals do not mirror the Communists and Bolsheviks.



The Western urge to rebel, coming out of the French Revolution, mutated quickly into several cults of death and mayhem. No matter the particular movement, there were two key conditions in all: 1) it was based on a submission to a central authority, the total state, and 2) it was based on the idea of one, the collective, instead of many.


They desire to destroy all tradition, values, and attitudes, beginning with morality, and the family, and built their imagined Utopia here on earth.


"They hate conservatives. They hate our country. They hate the American flag. They hate police. They hate traditional values. They hate rural voters. They hate rural America. They hate working class people. They hate those without college degrees. They hate anything not situated in urban America."
Intolerance: Oh, So This Is Why Around Half Of Liberals Can't Stand Being Around Trump Supporters


the constant drumbeat by the Left against tradition, morality and the family.


Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists. On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie." Marx and Engels, Communist Manifesto, ch 2...
Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)



After losing power, Leon Trotsky would claim that the reason that communism had not been successful was that Stalin had not been ruthless enough in his efforts to eliminate the family. See Trotsky's The Revolution Betrayed, trans. Max Eastman, New York, 1965, pp. 145ff.
The Abolition of the Family



"Just because any religious idea, any idea of any god at all, any flirtation even with a god, is the most inexpressible foulness, particularly tolerantly (and often even favourably) accepted by the democratic bourgeoisie—for that very reason it is the most dangerous foulness, the most shameful “infection.” A million physicalsins, dirty tricks, acts of violence and infections are much more easily discovered by the crowd, and therefore are much less dangerous, than the nubile, spiritual idea of god, dressed up in the most attractive “ideological” costumes." Letter from Lenin to Maxim Gorky, Written on November 13 or 14, 1913 Lenin 55. TO MAXIM GORKY



This is the America Democrats yearn for.


Did I mention that you are a dunce?????

Gee, what an imbecile you are.
I am not a Demo or Repub; i’m foremost an independent Libertarian who is liberal when it makes sense (women’s equal rights, even for Chics!) or conservative when it makes sense (liberty for all; don’t tread on me).
Cut/pasting boilerplate crap is such a loser response.

What you are is a moron.

We've proven that.


I gave you a simple task:

See if you can come up with a list of ways that the Democrats/Liberals do not mirror the Communists and Bolsheviks.


Let's add this: why the close and intimate embrace of Islam by the Democrats?


Warning: if this is the first time you have ever tried to think, you may be subject to an aneurysm.

Wow, what a moron you are.
Gee, ain’t it easy, and stupid to regress to name calling?
You have proven nothing, except that you don’t know how to debate specific issues.

What is your main claim?
Demo Liberals “mirror” communists?
It’s more obvious that Repubs who support Trump (NOT Reaganites) mirror Putin, a communist & KGB man in his past AND continued to be a totalitarian white nationalist.

Demos don’t embrace Islam, you idiot (you like name calling?), they embrace conservative values like FREEDOM OF RELIGION.

"What is your main claim?
Demo Liberals “mirror” communists?"


In every way, you dunce.



These were listed as the aims of the communist party, (CPUSA) after the war, and, to an almost 100% extent, they the same as today's Liberals/Progressives/Democrats.



1. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.


2. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.


3. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.





4. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.


5. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.


6. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.





7. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.


8. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."





9. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."







10. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.


11. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

12. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.


13. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce


Now....wouldn't an honest appraisal agree that all or almost all are clearly the aims and direction of Democrats/Liberals/Progressive leaders?



I got 'em from a website of declared communist goals...

The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals

The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals




10 planks of Communist manifesto

Communist Manifesto 10 Planks




How about you take a look at the aims of the Communist Party, USA, and the aims of the modern Democrat Party.

IQ, when it applies to you, should be written in lower case.

 

[PK1]

“Left has one agenda: destroy tradition, morality, values.”

That is so stupid it’s pathetic!
STUPID traditions (slavery, male chauvinism, religion, etc) need to be revised for modern times. Eh Chic?
Or are you really a male who uses a female appearance?

Gads, are you an imbecile.

You are the hope of the left....the blind who will not see.


The Left has always been about nihilism, death and destruction.


See if you can come up with a list of ways that the Democrats/Liberals do not mirror the Communists and Bolsheviks.



The Western urge to rebel, coming out of the French Revolution, mutated quickly into several cults of death and mayhem. No matter the particular movement, there were two key conditions in all: 1) it was based on a submission to a central authority, the total state, and 2) it was based on the idea of one, the collective, instead of many.


They desire to destroy all tradition, values, and attitudes, beginning with morality, and the family, and built their imagined Utopia here on earth.


"They hate conservatives. They hate our country. They hate the American flag. They hate police. They hate traditional values. They hate rural voters. They hate rural America. They hate working class people. They hate those without college degrees. They hate anything not situated in urban America."
Intolerance: Oh, So This Is Why Around Half Of Liberals Can't Stand Being Around Trump Supporters


the constant drumbeat by the Left against tradition, morality and the family.


Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists. On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie." Marx and Engels, Communist Manifesto, ch 2...
Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)



After losing power, Leon Trotsky would claim that the reason that communism had not been successful was that Stalin had not been ruthless enough in his efforts to eliminate the family. See Trotsky's The Revolution Betrayed, trans. Max Eastman, New York, 1965, pp. 145ff.
The Abolition of the Family



"Just because any religious idea, any idea of any god at all, any flirtation even with a god, is the most inexpressible foulness, particularly tolerantly (and often even favourably) accepted by the democratic bourgeoisie—for that very reason it is the most dangerous foulness, the most shameful “infection.” A million physicalsins, dirty tricks, acts of violence and infections are much more easily discovered by the crowd, and therefore are much less dangerous, than the nubile, spiritual idea of god, dressed up in the most attractive “ideological” costumes." Letter from Lenin to Maxim Gorky, Written on November 13 or 14, 1913 Lenin 55. TO MAXIM GORKY



This is the America Democrats yearn for.


Did I mention that you are a dunce?????

Gee, what an imbecile you are.
I am not a Demo or Repub; i’m foremost an independent Libertarian who is liberal when it makes sense (women’s equal rights, even for Chics!) or conservative when it makes sense (liberty for all; don’t tread on me).
Cut/pasting boilerplate crap is such a loser response.

What you are is a moron.

We've proven that.


I gave you a simple task:

See if you can come up with a list of ways that the Democrats/Liberals do not mirror the Communists and Bolsheviks.


Let's add this: why the close and intimate embrace of Islam by the Democrats?


Warning: if this is the first time you have ever tried to think, you may be subject to an aneurysm.

Wow, what a moron you are.
Gee, ain’t it easy, and stupid to regress to name calling?
You have proven nothing, except that you don’t know how to debate specific issues.

What is your main claim?
Demo Liberals “mirror” communists?
It’s more obvious that Repubs who support Trump (NOT Reaganites) mirror Putin, a communist & KGB man in his past AND continued to be a totalitarian white nationalist.

Demos don’t embrace Islam, you idiot (you like name calling?), they embrace conservative values like FREEDOM OF RELIGION.

The Democrats are the only ones who defended and supported the Communists for over 70 years.


Putin wanted Hillary, the candidate he had a history of bribing.
Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.

Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????


QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.



Now...which party supports Putin???







I gave you a simple task....two simple questions....but you're too simple to answer them:

See if you can come up with a list of ways that the Democrats/Liberals do not mirror the Communists and Bolsheviks.


Let's add this: why the close and intimate embrace of Islam by the Democrats?



If we leave a window open at either side of your head....would the wind gusts through your ears be measurable on the Beaumont Scale?
Need an anemometer be used?

Sorry, i’m not into simplistic one-sided lists like you are.
If you make claims, then provide your evidence; just saying does not make it so.
The US Intel leaders agree that Putin’s Russia supported Trump, not Clinton. Putin hated Clinton.

On Russia hacks ...

Daniel Coats, the director of national intelligence, said there is no dissent inside U.S. intelligence agencies about the conclusion that Russia used hacking and fake news to interfere in the 2016 presidential election.

"I am confident that the Russians meddled in this election, as is the entire intelligence community," CIA Director Mike Pompeo said.

Thomas Bossert, Trump’s counterterrorism and cyber adviser: "There is a pretty clear and easy answer to that and that is yes.”

Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly, also at the Aspen gathering, said Wednesday that he, too, saw it that way.

Intelligence director says agencies agree on Russian meddling

 

[PK1]

“Left has one agenda: destroy tradition, morality, values.”

That is so stupid it’s pathetic!
STUPID traditions (slavery, male chauvinism, religion, etc) need to be revised for modern times. Eh Chic?
Or are you really a male who uses a female appearance?

Gads, are you an imbecile.

You are the hope of the left....the blind who will not see.


The Left has always been about nihilism, death and destruction.


See if you can come up with a list of ways that the Democrats/Liberals do not mirror the Communists and Bolsheviks.



The Western urge to rebel, coming out of the French Revolution, mutated quickly into several cults of death and mayhem. No matter the particular movement, there were two key conditions in all: 1) it was based on a submission to a central authority, the total state, and 2) it was based on the idea of one, the collective, instead of many.


They desire to destroy all tradition, values, and attitudes, beginning with morality, and the family, and built their imagined Utopia here on earth.


"They hate conservatives. They hate our country. They hate the American flag. They hate police. They hate traditional values. They hate rural voters. They hate rural America. They hate working class people. They hate those without college degrees. They hate anything not situated in urban America."
Intolerance: Oh, So This Is Why Around Half Of Liberals Can't Stand Being Around Trump Supporters


the constant drumbeat by the Left against tradition, morality and the family.


Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists. On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie." Marx and Engels, Communist Manifesto, ch 2...
Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)



After losing power, Leon Trotsky would claim that the reason that communism had not been successful was that Stalin had not been ruthless enough in his efforts to eliminate the family. See Trotsky's The Revolution Betrayed, trans. Max Eastman, New York, 1965, pp. 145ff.
The Abolition of the Family



"Just because any religious idea, any idea of any god at all, any flirtation even with a god, is the most inexpressible foulness, particularly tolerantly (and often even favourably) accepted by the democratic bourgeoisie—for that very reason it is the most dangerous foulness, the most shameful “infection.” A million physicalsins, dirty tricks, acts of violence and infections are much more easily discovered by the crowd, and therefore are much less dangerous, than the nubile, spiritual idea of god, dressed up in the most attractive “ideological” costumes." Letter from Lenin to Maxim Gorky, Written on November 13 or 14, 1913 Lenin 55. TO MAXIM GORKY



This is the America Democrats yearn for.


Did I mention that you are a dunce?????

Gee, what an imbecile you are.
I am not a Demo or Repub; i’m foremost an independent Libertarian who is liberal when it makes sense (women’s equal rights, even for Chics!) or conservative when it makes sense (liberty for all; don’t tread on me).
Cut/pasting boilerplate crap is such a loser response.

What you are is a moron.

We've proven that.


I gave you a simple task:

See if you can come up with a list of ways that the Democrats/Liberals do not mirror the Communists and Bolsheviks.


Let's add this: why the close and intimate embrace of Islam by the Democrats?


Warning: if this is the first time you have ever tried to think, you may be subject to an aneurysm.

Wow, what a moron you are.
Gee, ain’t it easy, and stupid to regress to name calling?
You have proven nothing, except that you don’t know how to debate specific issues.

What is your main claim?
Demo Liberals “mirror” communists?
It’s more obvious that Repubs who support Trump (NOT Reaganites) mirror Putin, a communist & KGB man in his past AND continued to be a totalitarian white nationalist.

Demos don’t embrace Islam, you idiot (you like name calling?), they embrace conservative values like FREEDOM OF RELIGION.

"What is your main claim?
Demo Liberals “mirror” communists?"


In every way, you dunce.



These were listed as the aims of the communist party, (CPUSA) after the war, and, to an almost 100% extent, they the same as today's Liberals/Progressives/Democrats.



1. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.


2. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.


3. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.





4. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.


5. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.


6. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.





7. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.


8. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."





9. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."







10. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.


11. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

12. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.


13. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce


Now....wouldn't an honest appraisal agree that all or almost all are clearly the aims and direction of Democrats/Liberals/Progressive leaders?



I got 'em from a website of declared communist goals...

The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals

The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals




10 planks of Communist manifesto

Communist Manifesto 10 Planks




How about you take a look at the aims of the Communist Party, USA, and the aims of the modern Democrat Party.

IQ, when it applies to you, should be written in lower case.

You don’t know the meaning of “main”?
I asked you for your main claim, and you provide me a list of boiler plate crap?

 

[PK1]

I’m done playing politics with a dumb “chic”.
Going elsewhere, Bye bye

 

[PoliticalChic]

Gads, are you an imbecile.

You are the hope of the left....the blind who will not see.


The Left has always been about nihilism, death and destruction.


See if you can come up with a list of ways that the Democrats/Liberals do not mirror the Communists and Bolsheviks.



The Western urge to rebel, coming out of the French Revolution, mutated quickly into several cults of death and mayhem. No matter the particular movement, there were two key conditions in all: 1) it was based on a submission to a central authority, the total state, and 2) it was based on the idea of one, the collective, instead of many.


They desire to destroy all tradition, values, and attitudes, beginning with morality, and the family, and built their imagined Utopia here on earth.


"They hate conservatives. They hate our country. They hate the American flag. They hate police. They hate traditional values. They hate rural voters. They hate rural America. They hate working class people. They hate those without college degrees. They hate anything not situated in urban America."
Intolerance: Oh, So This Is Why Around Half Of Liberals Can't Stand Being Around Trump Supporters


the constant drumbeat by the Left against tradition, morality and the family.


Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists. On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie." Marx and Engels, Communist Manifesto, ch 2...
Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)



After losing power, Leon Trotsky would claim that the reason that communism had not been successful was that Stalin had not been ruthless enough in his efforts to eliminate the family. See Trotsky's The Revolution Betrayed, trans. Max Eastman, New York, 1965, pp. 145ff.
The Abolition of the Family



"Just because any religious idea, any idea of any god at all, any flirtation even with a god, is the most inexpressible foulness, particularly tolerantly (and often even favourably) accepted by the democratic bourgeoisie—for that very reason it is the most dangerous foulness, the most shameful “infection.” A million physicalsins, dirty tricks, acts of violence and infections are much more easily discovered by the crowd, and therefore are much less dangerous, than the nubile, spiritual idea of god, dressed up in the most attractive “ideological” costumes." Letter from Lenin to Maxim Gorky, Written on November 13 or 14, 1913 Lenin 55. TO MAXIM GORKY



This is the America Democrats yearn for.


Did I mention that you are a dunce?????

Gee, what an imbecile you are.
I am not a Demo or Repub; i’m foremost an independent Libertarian who is liberal when it makes sense (women’s equal rights, even for Chics!) or conservative when it makes sense (liberty for all; don’t tread on me).
Cut/pasting boilerplate crap is such a loser response.

What you are is a moron.

We've proven that.


I gave you a simple task:

See if you can come up with a list of ways that the Democrats/Liberals do not mirror the Communists and Bolsheviks.


Let's add this: why the close and intimate embrace of Islam by the Democrats?


Warning: if this is the first time you have ever tried to think, you may be subject to an aneurysm.

Wow, what a moron you are.
Gee, ain’t it easy, and stupid to regress to name calling?
You have proven nothing, except that you don’t know how to debate specific issues.

What is your main claim?
Demo Liberals “mirror” communists?
It’s more obvious that Repubs who support Trump (NOT Reaganites) mirror Putin, a communist & KGB man in his past AND continued to be a totalitarian white nationalist.

Demos don’t embrace Islam, you idiot (you like name calling?), they embrace conservative values like FREEDOM OF RELIGION.

The Democrats are the only ones who defended and supported the Communists for over 70 years.


Putin wanted Hillary, the candidate he had a history of bribing.
Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.

Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????


QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.



Now...which party supports Putin???







I gave you a simple task....two simple questions....but you're too simple to answer them:

See if you can come up with a list of ways that the Democrats/Liberals do not mirror the Communists and Bolsheviks.


Let's add this: why the close and intimate embrace of Islam by the Democrats?



If we leave a window open at either side of your head....would the wind gusts through your ears be measurable on the Beaumont Scale?
Need an anemometer be used?

Sorry, i’m not into simplistic one-sided lists like you are.
If you make claims, then provide your evidence; just saying does not make it so.
The US Intel leaders agree that Putin’s Russia supported Trump, not Clinton. Putin hated Clinton.

On Russia hacks ...

Daniel Coats, the director of national intelligence, said there is no dissent inside U.S. intelligence agencies about the conclusion that Russia used hacking and fake news to interfere in the 2016 presidential election.

"I am confident that the Russians meddled in this election, as is the entire intelligence community," CIA Director Mike Pompeo said.

Thomas Bossert, Trump’s counterterrorism and cyber adviser: "There is a pretty clear and easy answer to that and that is yes.”

Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly, also at the Aspen gathering, said Wednesday that he, too, saw it that way.

Intelligence director says agencies agree on Russian meddling

OMG!!!


Can you really be this stupid????


Well....I guess we've answered that already....




No, the intelligence community did no such thing.



–We were initially told that seventeen U.S. intelligence agencies had independently confirmed that Russia hacked the Democratic National Committee and our 2016 presidential election.

But wait! We now learn that only three agencies have confirmed this intelligence finding (CIA, NSA, FBI).

Further, only one agency actually conducted the majority of the research that netted that conclusion: The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

The main intelligence gathering was conducted by the CIA. In other words, the FBI and the NSA simply said "we agree" that the CIA's work is credible. The three agencies did not independently make this same conclusion. The CIA coerced the FBI and NSA into compliance.

....Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Sec. Jeh Johnson attempted to coerce several Secretaries of State about designating our voting systems as 'critical infrastructure' which would've subjugated those state's roles in the election to the federal government. To DHS's shock, the states outright rejected that request.


.... Democrats had plenty of cover to conflate these findings into an assertion of a Trump-collusion. This explains why none of the Obama-holdovers (including former FBI Director James Comey) were willing to formally admit they had no evidence (against Trump) and continued to act in a way that ultimately discredited President Trump.
Obama's Political Weapon Against Trump


. Oh....and BTW....subsequently, we have also learned that the DNC is in charge of both the DoJ and the FBI: they refused...refused... requests that the DNC's servers be investigated. Imagine, if you refused the FBI.

. Which brings us to Dmitri Alperovitch, and Crowdstrike.

a. “FBI SAYS THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY WOULDN’T LET AGENTS SEE THE HACKED EMAIL SERVERS ....neither the FBI nor any other intelligence agency ever did an independent assessment of the organization’s breached servers. Instead, they alleged, the FBI relied exclusively on information from private digital forensics company Crowdstrike. “
The FBI says the Democratic Party wouldn't let agents see the hacked email servers



The good news: the Left's Deep State relies on total morons to parrot whatever they claim......raise your paw.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Gads, are you an imbecile.

You are the hope of the left....the blind who will not see.


The Left has always been about nihilism, death and destruction.


See if you can come up with a list of ways that the Democrats/Liberals do not mirror the Communists and Bolsheviks.



The Western urge to rebel, coming out of the French Revolution, mutated quickly into several cults of death and mayhem. No matter the particular movement, there were two key conditions in all: 1) it was based on a submission to a central authority, the total state, and 2) it was based on the idea of one, the collective, instead of many.


They desire to destroy all tradition, values, and attitudes, beginning with morality, and the family, and built their imagined Utopia here on earth.


"They hate conservatives. They hate our country. They hate the American flag. They hate police. They hate traditional values. They hate rural voters. They hate rural America. They hate working class people. They hate those without college degrees. They hate anything not situated in urban America."
Intolerance: Oh, So This Is Why Around Half Of Liberals Can't Stand Being Around Trump Supporters


the constant drumbeat by the Left against tradition, morality and the family.


Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists. On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie." Marx and Engels, Communist Manifesto, ch 2...
Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)



After losing power, Leon Trotsky would claim that the reason that communism had not been successful was that Stalin had not been ruthless enough in his efforts to eliminate the family. See Trotsky's The Revolution Betrayed, trans. Max Eastman, New York, 1965, pp. 145ff.
The Abolition of the Family



"Just because any religious idea, any idea of any god at all, any flirtation even with a god, is the most inexpressible foulness, particularly tolerantly (and often even favourably) accepted by the democratic bourgeoisie—for that very reason it is the most dangerous foulness, the most shameful “infection.” A million physicalsins, dirty tricks, acts of violence and infections are much more easily discovered by the crowd, and therefore are much less dangerous, than the nubile, spiritual idea of god, dressed up in the most attractive “ideological” costumes." Letter from Lenin to Maxim Gorky, Written on November 13 or 14, 1913 Lenin 55. TO MAXIM GORKY



This is the America Democrats yearn for.


Did I mention that you are a dunce?????

Gee, what an imbecile you are.
I am not a Demo or Repub; i’m foremost an independent Libertarian who is liberal when it makes sense (women’s equal rights, even for Chics!) or conservative when it makes sense (liberty for all; don’t tread on me).
Cut/pasting boilerplate crap is such a loser response.

What you are is a moron.

We've proven that.


I gave you a simple task:

See if you can come up with a list of ways that the Democrats/Liberals do not mirror the Communists and Bolsheviks.


Let's add this: why the close and intimate embrace of Islam by the Democrats?


Warning: if this is the first time you have ever tried to think, you may be subject to an aneurysm.

Wow, what a moron you are.
Gee, ain’t it easy, and stupid to regress to name calling?
You have proven nothing, except that you don’t know how to debate specific issues.

What is your main claim?
Demo Liberals “mirror” communists?
It’s more obvious that Repubs who support Trump (NOT Reaganites) mirror Putin, a communist & KGB man in his past AND continued to be a totalitarian white nationalist.

Demos don’t embrace Islam, you idiot (you like name calling?), they embrace conservative values like FREEDOM OF RELIGION.

The Democrats are the only ones who defended and supported the Communists for over 70 years.


Putin wanted Hillary, the candidate he had a history of bribing.
Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.

Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????


QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.



Now...which party supports Putin???







I gave you a simple task....two simple questions....but you're too simple to answer them:

See if you can come up with a list of ways that the Democrats/Liberals do not mirror the Communists and Bolsheviks.


Let's add this: why the close and intimate embrace of Islam by the Democrats?



If we leave a window open at either side of your head....would the wind gusts through your ears be measurable on the Beaumont Scale?
Need an anemometer be used?

Sorry, i’m not into simplistic one-sided lists like you are.
If you make claims, then provide your evidence; just saying does not make it so.
The US Intel leaders agree that Putin’s Russia supported Trump, not Clinton. Putin hated Clinton.

On Russia hacks ...

Daniel Coats, the director of national intelligence, said there is no dissent inside U.S. intelligence agencies about the conclusion that Russia used hacking and fake news to interfere in the 2016 presidential election.

"I am confident that the Russians meddled in this election, as is the entire intelligence community," CIA Director Mike Pompeo said.

Thomas Bossert, Trump’s counterterrorism and cyber adviser: "There is a pretty clear and easy answer to that and that is yes.”

Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly, also at the Aspen gathering, said Wednesday that he, too, saw it that way.

Intelligence director says agencies agree on Russian meddling

There is no way a foreign power can actually influence our elections.
The proof of that is that the Russians did two half-hearted actions.

1. The dossier, which was designed to put Hillary in the White House.
2. Invested a pittnance.....$100 k.....in facebook ads...

… the $100,000 spent by the Russian government is laughably small, no matter how precisely targeted. In contrast, the official Trump campaign spent $90 million on digital ads — and, unlike the Russians, had assistance from Facebook employees to target and deploy them effectively. “There’s no way $100,000 in ad budget impacted the election. It’s ridiculous,” García Martínez said."
Did Russia’s Facebook Ads Actually Swing the Election?



Here is the proof that the Russians had no power to effect a win.....for the history challenged....you:

A pity you never read a book.....


While the Russians would have benefited from having the family they had a history of bribing in the White House, the Clintons, and their choice was clear when they produced the dossier to sink Trump, no nation has the ability to sway our election.

Even when their survival depended on it....the Russians had zero ability to move the vote.


Now, once upon a time….there was a candidate that the Kremlin feared, a military threat, they were actually convinced that a certain candidate for President was planning a first strike on Russia.

And they went all out to prevent his election…..with the conscious and active support of elected Democrats, the Liberal Lion, Ted Kennedy....

Ronald Reagan.


Vasili Mitrokhin worked for 30 years in the foreign intelligence archives of the KGB. In 1972 he was made responsible for moving the entire archives to new headquarters in Moscow. But Mitrokhin spent over a decade making notes and transcripts of these classified files. In 1992, British Secret Intelligence Service exfiltrated the defector, and his presence in the west remained secret until the publication of this book.


His book:

‘The Sword and the Shield: The Mitrokhin Archives, the History of the KGB,” by Christopher Andrew and Vasili Mitrokhin.

Mitrokhin outlines the full-court press that the Soviet power structure used to prevent a Reagan presidency….with, of course the joyful aid of such Democrat luminaries as Ted Kennedy.
“…chairman of the KGB….all foreign intelligence officers….active measures to ensure Reagan’s defeat….”
Mitrokhin, Op. Cit., p. 243




“Reagan won a forty-nine state landslide. The entire Soviet government, working hand-in-hand with [the Democrat hierarchy] and America’s most influential newspaper, couldn’t put a dent a US election…”
Coulter, “Resistance Is Futile,”p. 44-45





Just between the two of us….are you just a leeeeettttle disappointed at how you turned out?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Gads, are you an imbecile.

You are the hope of the left....the blind who will not see.


The Left has always been about nihilism, death and destruction.


See if you can come up with a list of ways that the Democrats/Liberals do not mirror the Communists and Bolsheviks.



The Western urge to rebel, coming out of the French Revolution, mutated quickly into several cults of death and mayhem. No matter the particular movement, there were two key conditions in all: 1) it was based on a submission to a central authority, the total state, and 2) it was based on the idea of one, the collective, instead of many.


They desire to destroy all tradition, values, and attitudes, beginning with morality, and the family, and built their imagined Utopia here on earth.


"They hate conservatives. They hate our country. They hate the American flag. They hate police. They hate traditional values. They hate rural voters. They hate rural America. They hate working class people. They hate those without college degrees. They hate anything not situated in urban America."
Intolerance: Oh, So This Is Why Around Half Of Liberals Can't Stand Being Around Trump Supporters


the constant drumbeat by the Left against tradition, morality and the family.


Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists. On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie." Marx and Engels, Communist Manifesto, ch 2...
Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)



After losing power, Leon Trotsky would claim that the reason that communism had not been successful was that Stalin had not been ruthless enough in his efforts to eliminate the family. See Trotsky's The Revolution Betrayed, trans. Max Eastman, New York, 1965, pp. 145ff.
The Abolition of the Family



"Just because any religious idea, any idea of any god at all, any flirtation even with a god, is the most inexpressible foulness, particularly tolerantly (and often even favourably) accepted by the democratic bourgeoisie—for that very reason it is the most dangerous foulness, the most shameful “infection.” A million physicalsins, dirty tricks, acts of violence and infections are much more easily discovered by the crowd, and therefore are much less dangerous, than the nubile, spiritual idea of god, dressed up in the most attractive “ideological” costumes." Letter from Lenin to Maxim Gorky, Written on November 13 or 14, 1913 Lenin 55. TO MAXIM GORKY



This is the America Democrats yearn for.


Did I mention that you are a dunce?????

Gee, what an imbecile you are.
I am not a Demo or Repub; i’m foremost an independent Libertarian who is liberal when it makes sense (women’s equal rights, even for Chics!) or conservative when it makes sense (liberty for all; don’t tread on me).
Cut/pasting boilerplate crap is such a loser response.

What you are is a moron.

We've proven that.


I gave you a simple task:

See if you can come up with a list of ways that the Democrats/Liberals do not mirror the Communists and Bolsheviks.


Let's add this: why the close and intimate embrace of Islam by the Democrats?


Warning: if this is the first time you have ever tried to think, you may be subject to an aneurysm.

Wow, what a moron you are.
Gee, ain’t it easy, and stupid to regress to name calling?
You have proven nothing, except that you don’t know how to debate specific issues.

What is your main claim?
Demo Liberals “mirror” communists?
It’s more obvious that Repubs who support Trump (NOT Reaganites) mirror Putin, a communist & KGB man in his past AND continued to be a totalitarian white nationalist.

Demos don’t embrace Islam, you idiot (you like name calling?), they embrace conservative values like FREEDOM OF RELIGION.

"What is your main claim?
Demo Liberals “mirror” communists?"


In every way, you dunce.



These were listed as the aims of the communist party, (CPUSA) after the war, and, to an almost 100% extent, they the same as today's Liberals/Progressives/Democrats.



1. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.


2. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.


3. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.





4. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.


5. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.


6. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.





7. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.


8. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."





9. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."







10. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.


11. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

12. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.


13. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce


Now....wouldn't an honest appraisal agree that all or almost all are clearly the aims and direction of Democrats/Liberals/Progressive leaders?



I got 'em from a website of declared communist goals...

The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals

The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals




10 planks of Communist manifesto

Communist Manifesto 10 Planks




How about you take a look at the aims of the Communist Party, USA, and the aims of the modern Democrat Party.

IQ, when it applies to you, should be written in lower case.

You don’t know the meaning of “main”?
I asked you for your main claim, and you provide me a list of boiler plate crap?

Can't you read????

 

[my2¢]

The Oklahoma International and Sharia Law Amendment, also known as State Question 755, was on the November 2, 2010 ballot in Oklahoma as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment, where it was approved. The measure required that courts rely on federal or state laws when handing down decisions concerning cases and prohibited them from using international law or Sharia law when making rulings.
​

I'm not joining the-sky-is-falling attitude on this ruling. The only problem I see of the courts not relying on federal or state laws is what I've read about the separate tax court where the Bill of Rights is pretty much tossed out the window. To a lessor extent a wee bit of that also goes on in the immigration court, where in rare case legal citizens have been deported due to lack of access to a lawyer.

The way I see it the courts already must rely on federal or state laws when handing down decisions, and the international/Sharia law part is extraneous and just as likely to open a can of worms. Especially on principles shared with Judeo-Christian based religions.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I’m done playing politics with a dumb “chic”.
Going elsewhere, Bye bye

Same response you had to education.

 

[Diver Diva]

I’m done playing politics with a dumb “chic”.
Going elsewhere, Bye bye

Aw, did PoliticalChic whoop your butt again?

LOL

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Oklahoma International and Sharia Law Amendment, also known as State Question 755, was on the November 2, 2010 ballot in Oklahoma as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment, where it was approved. The measure required that courts rely on federal or state laws when handing down decisions concerning cases and prohibited them from using international law or Sharia law when making rulings.
​

I'm not joining the-sky-is-falling attitude on this ruling. The only problem I see of the courts not relying on federal or state laws is what I've read about the separate tax court where the Bill of Rights is pretty much tossed out the window. To a lessor extent a wee bit of that also goes on in the immigration court, where in rare case legal citizens have been deported due to lack of access to a lawyer.

The way I see it the courts already must rely on federal or state laws when handing down decisions, and the international/Sharia law part is extraneous and just as likely to open a can of worms. Especially on principles shared with Judeo-Christian based religions.

See if this changes your mind:

1. In his book “Coercing Virtue: The Worldwide Rule of Judges,” Judge Bork tells this tale of the American Bar Association’s 2000 meeting in London, which included attendance of four Supreme Court Justices. A London barrister accused the Supreme Court of “turning its back on the Continent,” complaining that the justices “rarely cite the decisions of European courts.” Of course, many American lawyers began effusively apologizing. But Justice Kennedy “did not succumb to this combination of insolent foreign browbeating and pusillanimous American response.”

a. Kennedy proclaimed that if US courts cede authority to remote foreign courts “there is a risk of losing the allegiance of the people.”




2. If only Kennedy was a man of his word! Kennedy wrote the majority in Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005) in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that it is unconstitutional to impose capital punishment for crimes committed while under the age of 18. Kennedy referred favorably to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, and the International Convent on Civil and Political Rights. He also cited an European Union brief. He excused himself by that these were not “controlling,” but the Court “has referred to the laws of other countries and to international authorities as instructive for its interpretation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of ‘cruel and unusual punishments.’ “Roper v. Simmons - 03-633 (2005) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center





3. In a blistering dissent, Scalia, Rehnquist and Thomas wrote: “I do not believe that approval by ‘other nations and peoples’ should buttress our commitment to American principles any more than…disapproval by other ‘nations and peoples’ should weaken our commitment. More importantly,” foreign sources were being cited “not to underscore our fidelity to the Constitution” or to the American heritage, but rather “to set aside the centuries-old America practice- a practice still engaged in by a large majority of the relevant states- of letting a jury of 12 citizens decide whether, in a particular case, youth should be the basis of withholding the death penalty.” ROPER V. SIMMONS

4. Scalia pointed out that Supreme Court Justices who cite international opinion do so only when it conforms to their own, liberal, preferences. Further, he point out that American law in the areas of the exclusionary rule, abortion law, church-state relationships law, our law is more liberal than European laws….and that the Justices do not refer to alien law in those cases.






5. In the last few years, Kennedy, Breyer, Ginsburg, O’Connor and Stevens have all invoked foreign law in making decisions and filing dissents.
Fonte, “Sovereignty or Submission,” p. 110.

a. In 2003, Breyer, Ginsburg, and O’Connor met with French president Chirac to discuss French views on the death penalty. This, as the French were a prime mover on the Council of Europe with the announced intention of “abolishing capital punishment in the United States.” Multilateralism comes to the courts > Public Interest > National Affairs

b. “ In Grutter, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (joined by Justice Stephen Breyer) cited both the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (which the United States has ratified) and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (which it has not) as evidence of an “international understanding of the office of affirmative action.” In Justice Ginsburg’s view, these international conventions provide the grounds for “temporary special measures aimed at accelerating de facto equality.” Ibid.

c. “In Lawrence, Justice Anthony Kennedy prominently recurred to a friend-of-the-Court brief on foreign law and court decisions filed by Mary Robinson, the former U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, and to a key decision of the European Court of Human Rights.” Ibid.






6. So…we see the Liberal regularly attempting to marginalize American law and American history, to supplant same with foreign versions.

a. Liberals intend to replace American law. Need more proof? See Breyer’s dissent in Prinz v United States, touting European concepts over American. And in Knight v.Florida, he quotes India and even Zimbabwe.



7. So what America does the American Left love? That is for those on the left to answer. But given their beliefs that America was founded by racists and slaveholders, that it is an imperialist nation, that 35 million Americans go hungry, that it invades countries for corporate profits, and that it is largely racist and xenophobic, it is a fair question. The World Doesn't Hate America, the Left Does - Dennis Prager - [page]



Quo Vadis, America....sharia is coming to a court near you.



And remember this: sharia and the Constitution cannot co-exist.

 

[my2¢]

The 8th amendment of our constitution limits the government from imposing cruel and unusual punishment. I have no issue with a Supreme Court justice taking into consideration international law on such matter. Seems to me that on subjective matters one should be receptive to a broad range of opinions and I would disagree with Scalia, Rehnquist and Thomas stance of leaving it entirely up to the jury.

 

[Lysistrata]

This is a complete fantasy. Some people have "courts" for their respective religions, i.e. Roman Catholic canon law, Jewish law, Islamic "sharia law," ( I don't know what the fundamentalist Christian protestants do). These "courts" have power only over their constituents. In the United States, civil law is different that the laws of the various religions.

 

[Thinker101]

Watch out for them Mooslims!

Only Conservatives can protect us

Yep, because we know friggen liberals won't.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The 8th amendment of our constitution limits the government from imposing cruel and unusual punishment. I have no issue with a Supreme Court justice taking into consideration international law on such matter. Seems to me that on subjective matters one should be receptive to a broad range of opinions and I would disagree with Scalia, Rehnquist and Thomas stance of leaving it entirely up to the jury.

Wait....are you actually suggesting that the Constitution plays any role in government machinations????????


I suggest that you have never read it.....at least not article 1, section 8.


Open your eyes.



" I have no issue with a Supreme Court justice taking into consideration international law on such matter."

WHAT???????

So you never heard of the Revolutionary War, or of sovereignty?


That's exactly the view that the Left needs.




Your are the reason that I believe we are basking in the afterglow of a once great nation.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Watch out for them Mooslims!

Only Conservatives can protect us

Yep, because we know friggen liberals won't.

Anything that harms America is part of their agenda.

 

[22lcidw]

You cleaned that up good!

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

View attachment 270948 She's gonna rip you a new one PK....

If you mean she's going to post another wall of nonsensical alarmist nonsense, then yeah, she seems to have that in spades.

 

[PoliticalChic]

View attachment 270948 She's gonna rip you a new one PK....

If you mean she's going to post another wall of nonsensical alarmist nonsense, then yeah, she seems to have that in spades.

Clearly, my posts are over your head.....and it isn't your A.D.D. that is the bar, here.


It must be either education, or your ignoring that knock-down pitch.....


Best wishes for a speedy recovery.

 

[BlindBoo]

2. Here’s another: warnings about the ascendancy of Islam in this country.

Will sharia be accepted as ‘law’?

No?

Definitely not?

The handwriting is on the wall:

Be afraid of Sharia law, be very afraid.

".... the court can consider the Islamic passage referred to by plaintiff Awad in his last will and testament, as a means of ascertaining his wishes.

On the other hand, if his wishes somehow run afoul of U.S. laws — regardless of his personal wishes — then the court will rule them a violation of law."

Federal court deals blow to anti-Shariah efforts

But let the bed wetting begin.......