JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,767
- 2,220
Translation: "Blah, blah, blah, blah, the unaudited data could be audited by little elves at the North Pole, blah, blah, blah, and if the unaudited data is piled all on top of each other five times and shaken not stirred, it becomes good blah blah blah..."The methodology is is right on the BLS website, so there is no need to go to a DOL and ask some admin how BLS collects data.[
All 3 are facts of life but you won't go to a real person to validate those facts.
You must be an avid reader of The Wall Street Journal and Forbes.
Fact: you said they survey companies to get part-timer data
Fact: BLS says that is from the household survey
From above facts we can conclude you really don't know much about this subject, and the constant suggesting to drive to a local DoL office don't change that.
I already did, you just ignore it.Once again, point out the post where I state the BLS is dishonest.
Using unaudited data does not make an agency dishonest.
It simply means no analysis or prediction made upon that input can be trusted to ensure the future prosperity of a nation.
You have no idea whether their data is audited and you know it, remember you're the one confused about CES vs CPS so you can't expect anyone to believe you have some intimate knowledge of BLS statistical auditing procedures.
You're the only one talking about predictions in here, I'm taking about historical part-time worker data that say is phony but in 10 pages of a thread can't prove.
Dude, give it up already, you are humiliating yourself.