Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Europeans benefit by having small black populations. Because the Japanese have the sense to keep Negroes out, the Negro population in Japan is virtually non existent.Not really. We spend less than 500 billion on a 4 Trillion dollar budget on poverty relief.
We spend over 100 Billion on the Prison industrial Complex, and we really aren't any safer.
The Europeans and Japanese have figured this out... they put the emphasis on social programs instead of criminal sanctions. They have nowhere near the level of crime we do. (And yes, the UK and France have substantial black populations)
Europeans benefit by having small black populations. Because the Japanese have the sense to keep Negroes out, the Negro population in Japan is virtually non existent.
Yes, when you economically oppress a people, you are going to have problems.Whites in the UK and France are learning that blacks and Muslims create many problems.
Joseph Stalin demonstrated that a prison system can be run at a profit to the government if we make the convicts work fourteen hours a day and deny them educational and recreational opportunities.
Why would they go to Japan to start with? Japan doesn't let ANYONE into their country, not even your lilly-white ass.The Japanese have the sense to keep Negroes out of their countries.
In the UK and France Negroes have higher crime rates than whites.
In the United States social reform and social welfare spending never reduced the crime rate. The growth of the prison system did.
Orientals and Jews have low crime rates, even when they are poor.Why would they go to Japan to start with? Japan doesn't let ANYONE into their country, not even your lilly-white ass.
Yes, poor people commit more crimes than well-off people. If you were hungry enough, you'd commit crimes, too.
The crime rate declined because the boomers aged out.
The prison industrial complex mostly locks up people for things that shouldn't be crimes to start with.
Not really.Orientals and Jews have low crime rates, even when they are poor.
Chinese and Japanese have low crime rates in their country, so it would be counter intuitive to argue that the trip across the Pacific Ocean turned them into criminals. They were banned at the behest of white working class people who thought that they worked too hard.Not really.
In fact, Asians were banned from this country for a very long time for the amount of crime they brought with them. THere's a reason why every big city has a Chinatown.
As for Jews, the Word "Ghetto" was originally created to describe Jewish enclaves.
Chinese and Japanese have low crime rates in their country, so it would be counter intuitive to argue that the trip across the Pacific Ocean turned them into criminals. They were banned at the behest of white working class people who thought that they worked too hard.
Chinatown's are not crime infested slums.
Jewish Ghetto's were not either.
We have obviously had different experiences with Chinatown's. I have found those in San Francisco, Oakland, and Washington, DC to be clean and safe.China is a communist dictatorship that executes people for belonging to the wrong religion and sells their parts for transplant organs. You really want to cite that as a good example? In fact, the main reasons why Chinese were banned in the 19th century is that they brought opium addiction and prostitution with them.
At the time Japanese were banned, they were seen as a military rival.
I'm currently engaged to a Chinese immigrant who used to live in Chicago's Chinatown. She says she wouldn't go there at night. I went there with her once, and frankly, I was surprised how run down the place was. As bad as the West Side? Meh, not really. But not great.
Actually, they were. Why do you think the Jews were as hated in Europe as they were? The thing is, when the Nazis said "Hand over your Jews", most countries were happy to do it. (An exception being Denmark).
We have obviously had different experiences with Chinatown's. I have found those in San Francisco, Oakland, and Washington, DC to be clean and safe.
goodmigrations.com
Jews were hated first because of religious bigotry. As Christian bigotry faded non religious people often resented Jews because of their intelligence, their success, and their prosperity. As intelligence becomes increasingly important to our economy and our technology the wealth and power of the Jews will increase.
According to the United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime the yearly murder rate per 100,000 inhabitants is 0.1% in Singapore, 0.3% in Japan, 0.6% in Korea, and 0.8% in South Korea. In the United States it is 6.8%.
In the United States in 1963, which is to say before the civil rights legislation was passed and the War on Poverty was declared, it was 4.6%.
The notion that economic deprivation necessarily leads to lawlessness is widely believed but is not supported by empirical evidence. Human history is replete with examples of impoverished people—of all racial and ethnic backgrounds—who have endured extreme poverty without descending into criminal activity. During the 1960s, for instance, the residents of San Francisco’s Chinatown were among America’s poorest people—with the most unemployment, the worst housing conditions, the least education, and the highest rate of tuberculosis in their city. Yet despite such hardships, only five people of Chinese ancestry went to jail in the entire state of California in 1965
I'd like to see them have a less stupid religion, then they'd only be as annoying as other white people.The Jews are the most superior group of people in the world. I like to see them move up, move in, take over. They deserve the best we have to offer.
It is not Chinese who are committing those crimes. Chinese are wonderful people so are Jews.The ultimate neighborhood guide to Chinatown, San Francisco
Chinatown is a bustling, diverse hive of shops, restaurants, and tourists, which makes it a perfect home for those seeking lots of energy. See home prices and more with our ultimate guide.
SAFETY
Chinatown has a high violent crime rate and a high property crime rate for San Francisco.
Actually, religious bigotry is part of it. So is their culture. it's a problem when you go through life thinking your God's chosen people and the rest of us are "Goyim" to be taken advantage of.
Um, yes, we have decided we love our guns more than we love our children.
Which is still really high compared to other industrialized nations. Should also point out the murder rate was 9.8% in the 1920's and 1930's, most of them committed by white immigrants. the murder rate peaked again in the 1970's. About the same time the first Baby Boomers started coming of age. That's when the crack epidemic hit, when the gun industry moved away from hunting weapons to personal weapons, and a number of other factors you ignore because you are trying to rationalize your racism. It went down in the 1990's, when the Baby Boomers started aging out of "Dumbass".
Make up your mind, is SF Chinatown a slum or is it a nice clean place.
Again, the reason why the US Government restricted Chinese immigration was that they brought crime with them in terms of opium and prostitution. Racist? Yup, racist as hell.
I'd like to see them have a less stupid religion, then they'd only be as annoying as other white people.
So are black people.It is not Chinese who are committing those crimes. Chinese are wonderful people so are Jews.
My offense consists of drawing attention to facts like these:So are black people.
Every group has their awful people in them.
Sadly, we white people are stuck with you.
My offense consists of drawing attention to facts like these:
Race differences start in the womb. Blacks are born earlier and grow quicker than Whites and Orientals. The three-way race pattern occurs in milestones such as sexual maturity, family stability, crime rates, and population growth...
A racist is one who is willing to draw attention to congenital deficiencies that have always characterized most Negroes. An anti racist is one who tries to suppress factual assertions he knows he cannot disprove.Being a racist douchnoodle? that's your offense.
The reality is, most crime is committed by white people in this country, and the criminal justice system treats white people far less harshly than black people. So any bullshit statistics you bring up can be ignored.
If black people were so "inferior", then white people wouldn't have needed the following to keep them in line.
Slavery
Jim Crow
Redlining
Miscengation Laws
Sundown Laws
Debt Peonage
Poll Taxes
Lynching
Literacy tests
Segregation
Holy shit, really? Did he actually believe this nonsense.
Here's all you need to know about Phillippe Rushton.
Former prof Philippe Rushton's research denounced as "racist" by department
Rushton conducted research at Western from 1977 until his death in 2012, and was best known for his controversial work attempting to link race and intelligence.westerngazette.ca
Western's Department of Psychology denounced the work of former professor Philippe Rushton, known for his research attempting to link race and intelligence.
The statement, published after a department meeting on Monday, disavows Rushton’s work as “racist” and an abuse of academic freedom. The statement does not apologize for Western University’s role in supporting Rushton’s work.
“Rushton’s work is deeply flawed from a scientific standpoint,” reads the statement. “Rushton’s works on ‘race and intelligence’ are based on an incorrect assumption that fuels systemic racism.”
The statement came less than a day after Western released the findings of its Anti-Racism Working Group. The report found there to be “systemic problems embedded within the university” and included 24 recommendations to rebuild how racism is handled on campus. One of these recommendations was to “acknowledge and apologize for the harm caused by … Philippe Rushton.”
The department also says Rushton conducted research without the proper ethics approvals throughout his tenure, once on his own students, and acknowledges that his work has been used to support racist agendas.
A racist is one who is willing to draw attention to congenital deficiencies that have always characterized most Negroes. An anti racist is one who tries to suppress factual assertions he knows he cannot disprove.
This is an example of the appeal to authority fallacy; it was asserted, but never proved: “Rushton’s work is deeply flawed from a scientific standpoint,” reads the statement. “Rushton’s works on ‘race and intelligence’ are based on an incorrect assumption that fuels systemic racism.”
Scientific truth is not determined by unproven assertions, but by repeatable experiments, and credible data.
retractionwatch.com
Income inequality is a psychological, rather than economic, problem. If millionaires resent billionaires, that is their problem. And the idea that restricting wealth reduces poverty is wrongheaded. Marx had a mercantilist view that capital was a fixed quantity, like land, that could be redistributed by the State. While it is true that unregulated speculation can cause destructive economic downturns, that is no more an elemental component of capitalism than famine is of collectivism.I think Marx had two valid insights. These explain the Great Depression, and the current rise in economic inequality. First, the natural tendency of un or lightly regulated capitalism is to accumulate wealth and income at the top. Second, partly as a result of this capitalist economies experience increasingly destructive economic downturns.
Karl Marx believed that capitalism was good at creating wealth, but bad at distributing it.Income inequality is a psychological, rather than economic, problem. If millionaires resent billionaires, that is their problem. And the idea that restricting wealth reduces poverty is wrongheaded. Marx had a mercantilist view that capital was a fixed quantity, like land, that could be redistributed by the State. While it is true that unregulated speculation can cause destructive economic downturns, that is no more an elemental component of capitalism than famine is of collectivism.
Sounds like an oxymoron. Who is going to create the wealth?Karl Marx believed that capitalism was good at creating wealth, but bad at distributing it.
