Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The intent of this bad faith measure is to intimidate, to have a chilling effect on citizens recording LEO activity at all regardless the distance or circumstances, the consequence of citizens’ fear and ignorance of the law.Look I agree, but with at least something concrete on paper their is at least a ground rule.
If interfering with a police matter is left only to officer discretion then it will be a free for all for the cops.
MAGA
The intent of this bad faith measure is to intimidate, to have a chilling effect on citizens recording LEO activity at all regardless the distance or circumstances, the consequence of citizens’ fear and ignorance of the law.
youre premise is a lie,,The intent of this bad faith measure is to intimidate, to have a chilling effect on citizens recording LEO activity at all regardless the distance or circumstances, the consequence of citizens’ fear and ignorance of the law.
Huh? Just stand 9-10 feet away, dope! That's all! Did that one slip by you? They just don't want you in their business where they have to worry about you being some crazy with a knife while they are already dealing with some other loon.
So if there are no boundaries at all do you wish to leave it to officer discretion then watch abuse of power. Now at least something that is concrete is on the books. Whether you or I agree with it.
MAGA
So exactly what guidelines are you going to set? Leave it to officer discretion?
Uhm no, FUCK NO!
MAGA
And without ANY boundaries they can declare officer discretion on ANYTHING or ANY distance and arrest.I'm with Clayton. The current interference laws are adequate to protect police from the public getting in their way. This law is intended to chill filming and to give police discretion to lay charges or not, when they're being being filmed. All they have to do is to walk toward somebody and when they get within 8 feet, charge them, if they don't stop filming.
Well, this isn't about police discretion, this is about what happens in courts.
That is seems Trump supporters need everything spelled out to them in crayons is a little worrying, don't you thing?
No.So if there are no boundaries at all do you wish to leave it to officer discretion then watch abuse of power. Now at least something that is concrete is on the books. Whether you or I agree with it.
MAGA
To conceal police misconduct and criminality.Isn't "interfering with a police officer in the performance of his duty" already a crime. Why do they need a special law about filming????
Not if a citizen isn’t recording the incident.And without ANY boundaries they can declare officer discretion on ANYTHING or ANY distance and arrest.
MAGA
Wouldn't stop me, sorry if it does you.No.
Again, fearful and ignorant of the law, citizens won’t make the effort to record LEO activities at all – hence the chilling effect, the true intent of the law.
You're actually calling me a tRump supporter, ROTFLMFAO! I mean you just can't make this shit up!!!!! Do you eat crayons?
MAGA
Bow up and do your civic duty to keep these assholes in line. They established the boundaries now they cannot declare "officers discretion".Not if a citizen isn’t recording the incident.
Yup, sure do because the tRumptards just love it when it is stuck in their eye.I didn't, but you write "MAGA" at the end of every post.
Yup, sure do because the tRumptards just love it when it is stuck in their eye.
MAGA
MAGAAnyway....
Isn't "interfering with a police officer in the performance of his duty" already a crime. Why do they need a special law about filming????
Wouldn't stop me, sorry if it does you.
MAGA
Nope only way I would stop is if I ended up dead.Because bad cops want an excuse to torture, kidnap, and murder those recording.
Yes, it would. If you didn't stop, you might end up too dead to record.
