How We Know Tim Walz Did Poorly in the Debate

Simple, the talking points are still being written and no board leftoid has posted a thread telling us Walz was great.

Easy-peasy.

They're working their little brains overtime in some Dem crackhead boiler room trying to spin this somehow, some way.

And today, the Party starts pulling money from Harris-Walz and instead tries and save as many Senate seats as they can.

Check out the meltdown on MSNBC. That's how you know this was a absolute DISASTER for Kamala.

 
GY2v3HmXMAAtSul
Vance did a bit better than expected and Walz not as good as expected but it was no slam-dunk by anyone

Following the debate, 51% of viewers said that Vance did the better job, with 49% picking Walz. In a survey conducted of the same voters prior to the debate, Walz held the advantage as the candidate they expected to perform more strongly, 54% to 45%.
 
When Walz forced Vance to run from saying Biden won fair and square, Walz won. The whole nation saw Vance chicken out and go election-stealing fascist. Walz was the alpha there, and Vance couldn't face him.

We also know he won because the Trump cultists are now crying.

No, it wasn't the dominating beatdown that Harris delivered to Trump, but Walz did do a little better. Pretty good, considering it was a high school coach vs a lawyer trained in the art of Christofascist deception.

See you in November, Trump cult losers. Emphasis on the "loser" part. Looks like Cruz is losing too.
And Kari Lake in Arizona is toast.
MAGAts are not only about to lose the presidential election but probably both houses of Congress as well.
That's what happens when you keep running shit for candidates.
 
Best bit for sure. His face when JD was talking too was lol, it was level with Biden and Trump debate. Tim has no political future in the presidential arena. Stick to state politics TIm, you are out of your league.
The serious problem with Walz is he is not just a goofy knucklehead. He has a pattern of lying about what he has done to gain "street cred" which is indicates a lack of integrity.
 
Actually, I was impressed with Walz. He came across to me as a genuine and decent person, and as someone who is not an idealogue. Very few people seem to have noticed that Walz put himself to the right of Kamala Harris on a few issues with some his responses. To be sure, he is a liberal, but I do not think he is an idealogue.

Of course, this does not change the facts about the negative parts of Walz's record as governor, but I was pleased to see that he is civil and open to dialogue and persuasion, unlike his running mate.
 

Forum List

Back
Top