How wil hillary deal with trumps 0% income tax?

SuperDemocrat

Gold Member
Mar 4, 2015
8,200
868
275
the left has always been able to get middle class voters by claiming that the rich are going to kill them one day (middle class class conflict). That is another issue but how do you think the Hillary campaign will deal with voters who are swayed by trumps 0% income tax for any couple making below 50k a year?
 
Versus death by a thousand paper cuts by Democrats?

A better question might be, would inner city poor take advantage of free college?
 
the left has always been able to get middle class voters by claiming that the rich are going to kill them one day (middle class class conflict). That is another issue but how do you think the Hillary campaign will deal with voters who are swayed by trumps 0% income tax for any couple making below 50k a year?

So that 47% who pay no income tax now will get their income tax cut to zero by Trump?

wow, Merry Christmas!
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
the left has always been able to get middle class voters by claiming that the rich are going to kill them one day (middle class class conflict). That is another issue but how do you think the Hillary campaign will deal with voters who are swayed by trumps 0% income tax for any couple making below 50k a year?

So that 47% who pay no income tax now will get their income tax cut to zero by Trump?

wow, Merry Christmas!

How can you say people pay no income tax whe, in fact, I know people file and mail away their checks every year. I don't understand this argument.
 
the left has always been able to get middle class voters by claiming that the rich are going to kill them one day (middle class class conflict). That is another issue but how do you think the Hillary campaign will deal with voters who are swayed by trumps 0% income tax for any couple making below 50k a year?
We already have that in effect for 47% of the work force

So it's nothing new is it?
 
She'll call him racist, homophobic, and sexist. The standard Democrat attack Bullshite. ;)
 
She'll call him racist, homophobic, and sexist. The standard Democrat attack Bullshite. ;)

And ignore any issues that she doesn't have an answer for.

Unless cornered. And then she will lie.

She's already set her strategy. She's gonna play the 'victim.' And of course the corrupt Communist/Progressive Press is all set to play along. You know, like she's 'Broke?' It's gonna be more sorry lies like that. We'll see if the People fall for it. Stay tuned.
 
Versus death by a thousand paper cuts by Democrats?

A better question might be, would inner city poor take advantage of free college?

First, there is no "free". Someone will be paying for this "free" college. Secondly, even with folks paying for their own college, a full 1/3 drop out. When college is made "free" that will only serve to increase the dropout rate. It will be a tremendous waste of money yet again.
 
She'll call him racist, homophobic, and sexist. The standard Democrat attack Bullshite. ;)

And ignore any issues that she doesn't have an answer for.

Unless cornered. And then she will lie.

She's already set her strategy. She's gonna play the 'victim.' And of course the corrupt Communist/Progressive Press is all set to play along. You know, like she's 'Broke?' It's gonna be more sorry lies like that. We'll see if the People fall for it. Stay tuned.

Yes, she will play the "woman" card and cry again.
 
By asking him what he'll cut to offset the tax cut
Obama phones
reproducing while on welfare
immigration
PP funding
NPR funding
IRS
EPA
BLM
The phone thing was already operating when Obama became President. The Republican Congress can end the program anytime. The phone industry will not let them. They have the Congress bought and paid for.

Reproducing while on welfare or under any other circumstance is a 1rst Amendment freedom of religion right.

Immigration is an issue to be decided by Congress. The Republicans are constantly fighting over what to do, so nothing really gets done.

PP funding is again, a task of the Congress. Some of the Republicans are trying to stop the funding. If enough of them jump on that bandwagon the defunding will happen. Again, not enough of those Republicans want to be on the bad side of women in their districts so it probably won't happen.

NPR, same as all those other things. Republicans can not get together on the issue and so the issue is a constant whining issue. Let us know when the votes are available to stop the popular NPR from operating.

EPA, we don't want to live in smog and drink polluted water thankyou.

BLM, it is property owned by the citizens of America, purchased with hard cold cash (Alaska and the Louisiana Purchase), warfare and the blood of American military personnel (wars with Mexico and native American Tribes). The BLM is simply the agency tasked with maintaining and caring for some of our property and investments.
 
She'll call him racist, homophobic, and sexist. The standard Democrat attack Bullshite. ;)

And ignore any issues that she doesn't have an answer for.

Unless cornered. And then she will lie.

She's already set her strategy. She's gonna play the 'victim.' And of course the corrupt Communist/Progressive Press is all set to play along. You know, like she's 'Broke?' It's gonna be more sorry lies like that. We'll see if the People fall for it. Stay tuned.

Yes, she will play the "woman" card and cry again.

Yeah, the 'victim' strategy's already been set. Her serial rapist husband did the same thing everytime one of his victims came forward. It was all the 'Republican's fault' he was a degenerate sexual predator. Same ole same ole. We'll see if the People buy into it this time around.
 
debate.jpg
 
The conservatives turned Trumpbots who used to complain about the 47% who had no 'skin in the game' will now happily embrace Trump's idea to take more skin out of the game.

Irrationality at its finest.
 
The conservatives turned Trumpbots who used to complain about the 47% who had no 'skin in the game' will now happily embrace Trump's idea to take more skin out of the game.

Irrationality at its finest.

Your assumption that the same conservatives who complained before about "no skin" are the same ones that are embracing Trumps "less skin" plan is just that an ASSumption.
 

Forum List

Back
Top