How YouTube Nazis hide/censor "problematic" videos

[AsianTrumpSupporter]

[

Time to extend the first amendment to the internet.

 

[konradv]

I thought they were Trump types, i.e. entrepreneurs! Why wouldn't they want to regulate videos of a dubious nature that make their site look bad?

 

[JakeStarkey]

The 1st Amendment does not apply to YouTube.

 

[MisterBeale]

Yeah, this seems more like a complaint about YT's business model.

If a content creator only ran a website and just used YT as a video hosting service, but YT decides to censor their videos, THEN they would have something to bitch about. THAT is limiting a person's freedom of speech. At that point, you take your business somewhere else.

If they want to make money with their business model they just need to play by YT rules.

OTH, freedom of speech means having the ability to actually get your message out.

What these yahoos really need to complain about is when folks aren't monetizing, and YT is blacklisting the message anyway.

Regarding Bitchute.



BitChute is a peer to peer video sharing platform.