Mikeoxenormous
Diamond Member
Logically ice melts at 32 degrees right?
32°F (0°C)
Ice melts at temperatures above 32°F (0°C), which is its melting point1. During the melting process, the temperature remains constant at 0 °C2. Any energy added breaks the hydrogen bonds between ice (water) molecules2. Ice is the solid form that liquid water takes when it is cooled below 0 degrees Celsius (32 degrees Fahrenheit)3. Ice does not melt at 100 degrees Celsius (212 degrees Fahrenheit)4.
Learn more:
Now from the Globull Warming "Ex-Spurts" they say the Polar Ice Caps are melting, which means that the temperature up there is above 32 degrees.
This is the Ex-Spurts statement, not mine.
Polar ice caps are melting due to the ongoing warming of Earth’s surface and ocean1. The Arctic is warming twice as fast as anywhere on earth, and the sea ice there is declining by more than 10% every 10 years2. We lose Arctic sea ice at a rate of almost 13% per decade, and over the past 30 years, the oldest and thickest ice in the Arctic has declined by a stunning 95%3. As this ice melts, darker patches of ocean start to emerge, eliminating the effect that previously cooled the poles, creating warmer air temperatures and in turn disrupting normal patterns of ocean circulation2.
So with all that warming air temperatures disrupting ocean circulations where does the below 32 degrees temperature come from? Venus? Mars? Maybe Pluto?
Todays event happening now.
MSN
https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/17/business/rich-americans-climate-footprint-emissions/index.html
32°F (0°C)
Ice melts at temperatures above 32°F (0°C), which is its melting point1. During the melting process, the temperature remains constant at 0 °C2. Any energy added breaks the hydrogen bonds between ice (water) molecules2. Ice is the solid form that liquid water takes when it is cooled below 0 degrees Celsius (32 degrees Fahrenheit)3. Ice does not melt at 100 degrees Celsius (212 degrees Fahrenheit)4.
Learn more:
Now from the Globull Warming "Ex-Spurts" they say the Polar Ice Caps are melting, which means that the temperature up there is above 32 degrees.
This is the Ex-Spurts statement, not mine.
Polar ice caps are melting due to the ongoing warming of Earth’s surface and ocean1. The Arctic is warming twice as fast as anywhere on earth, and the sea ice there is declining by more than 10% every 10 years2. We lose Arctic sea ice at a rate of almost 13% per decade, and over the past 30 years, the oldest and thickest ice in the Arctic has declined by a stunning 95%3. As this ice melts, darker patches of ocean start to emerge, eliminating the effect that previously cooled the poles, creating warmer air temperatures and in turn disrupting normal patterns of ocean circulation2.
So with all that warming air temperatures disrupting ocean circulations where does the below 32 degrees temperature come from? Venus? Mars? Maybe Pluto?
Todays event happening now.
MSN
We share the same planet as everyone else, at least those that arent the Globull Elites who dont want to share with anyone. Why do they lie to US all the time? Is it that the uneducated Joe Biden voters will take it hook, line and sinker? You can bet on it, and those elites are stealing the wealth of America.SEOUL, Dec. 20 (Yonhap) -- The nation is bracing for an arctic cold wave later this week, with morning lows plummeting to between minus 19 C and minus 5 C across the country, the state weather agency said Wednesday.
The season's strongest cold wave is forecast to peak on Thursday and Friday, when the minimum temperatures will drop to minus 15 C in Seoul, minus 18 C in the northeastern city of Chuncheon, minus 13 C in the central city of Daejeon and minus 6 C in the southern city of Busan, according to the Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA).
https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/17/business/rich-americans-climate-footprint-emissions/index.html
The report also identified “super-emitters.” They are almost exclusively among the wealthiest top 0.1% of Americans, concentrated in industries such as finance, insurance and mining, and produce around 3,000 tons of carbon pollution a year. To put that in perspective, it’s estimated people should limit their carbon footprint to around 2.3 tons a year to tackle climate change.
“Fifteen days of income for a top 0.1% household generates as much carbon pollution as a lifetime of income for a household in the bottom 10%,” Starr said.