I cant believe I am actually going to post this but here goes.

While she should be in jail, I don't believe she will ever see the inside of it. Trump will let it go and she will fade into the sunset. Know why I'm ok with that? Cause justice was served on an orange platter. No matter what, she has to live with (and relive it over and over in her head) that she lost her one shot at potus to Donald Trump. The worse names they call him, the better ... cause she lost to that. Ha ha ha ha ha!

Did anyone see the little speech she gave the other day? She looks like shit ... as well she should. Looks like she's been drinking and crying alllll week long. :lol:


14054051_783309655140265_5377470961882682871_n.png
9248c3cbf5c0d454da9ac6c494fc1a00_1.png
 
"Well regulated" is part of the 2nd amendment.
Well regulated does not mean regulations. When the Constitution specifies regulations it specifically states who and what is being regulated. The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. The fundamental purpose of the militia was to serve as a check upon a standing army, the words “well regulated” referred to the necessity that the armed citizens making up the militia have the necessary equipment and training necessary to be an effective and formidable check upon the national government’s standing army. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.
Oh thank you random internet idiot :cuckoo:
“These Negroes, they’re getting pretty uppity these days and that’s a problem for us since they’ve got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we’ve got to do something about this, we’ve got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference. For if we don’t move at all, then their allies will line up against us and there’ll be no way of stopping them, we’ll lose the filibuster and there’ll be no way of putting a brake on all sorts of wild legislation. It’ll be Reconstruction all over again.”

Lyndon Johnson

The Democratic Party's Two-Facedness of Race Relations | Huffington Post

Master of the Senate: The Years of Lyndon Johnson III, By Robert A. Caro, p662
hearsay, there is no proof Johnson said that....
Even you beloved Huffington Post acknowledges the racist heritage of the Democratic Party. Why don't you?

The Democratic Party's Two-Facedness of Race Relations | The Huffington Post
 
There are 13 Congressional Volumes which detail how the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party for the express purpose of taking back their statehouses from BLACK REPUBLICANS through force and intimidation.

Full text of "Report of the Joint select committee appointed to inquire in to the condition of affairs in the late insurrectionary states : so far as regards the execution of the laws, and the safety of the lives and property of the citizens of the United States and Testimony taken"

Black political participation in Reconstruction | The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History

"Blacks made up the overwhelming majority of southern Republican voters, forming a coalition with “carpetbaggers” and “scalawags” (derogatory terms referring to recent arrivals from the North and southern white Republicans, respectively). A total of 265 African-American delegates were elected, more than 100 of whom had been born into slavery. Almost half of the elected black delegates served in South Carolina and Louisiana, where blacks had the longest history of political organization; in most other states, African Americans were underrepresented compared to their population. In all, 16 African Americans served in the U.S. Congress during Reconstruction; more than 600 more were elected to the state legislatures, and hundreds more held local offices across the South."

Articles: The Secret Racist History of the Democratic Party

"In almost every Southern state, the Republican Party was actually formed by blacks, not whites. Case in point is Houston, Texas, where 150 blacks and 20 whites created the Republican Party of Texas. But perhaps most telling of all with respect to the Republican Party’s achievements is that black men were continuously elected to public office. For example, 42 blacks were elected to the Texas legislature, 112 in Mississippi, 190 in South Carolina, 95 representatives and 32 senators in Louisiana, and many more elected in other states -- all Republican. Democrats didn’t elect their first black American to the U.S. House until 1935!"

"By the mid-1860s, the Republican Party’s alliance with blacks had caused a noticeable strain on the Democrats’ struggle for electoral significance in the post-Civil War era. This prompted the Democratic Party in 1866 to develop a new pseudo-secret political action group whose sole purpose was to help gain control of the electorate. The new group was known simply by their initials, KKK (Ku Klux Klan). This political relationship was nationally solidified shortly thereafter during the 1868 Democratic National Convention when former Civil War General Nathan Bedford Forrest was honored as the KKK’s first Grand Wizard. But don’t bother checking the Democratic National Committee’s website for proof. For many years, even up through the 2012 Presidential Election, the DNC had omitted all related history from 1848 to 1900 from their timeline -- half a century worth! Nevertheless, this sordid history is still well documented. There’s even a thirteen-volume set of Congressional investigations dating from 1872 detailing the Klan’s connection to the Democratic Party. The official documents, titled Report of the Joint Select Committee to Inquire Into the Condition of Affairs in the Late Insurrectionary States, irrefutably proves the KKK’s prominent role in the Democratic Party."

September 3, 1868

25 African-Americans in the Georgia legislature, all Republicans, were expelled by the Democrat majority. They were later reinstated by a Republican-controlled Congress.

September 12, 1868

Civil rights activist Tunis Campbell and all other African-Americans in the Georgia Senate – all Republicans – were expelled by the Democrat majority. They were later be reinstated by a Republican-controlled Congress.

October 7, 1868

Republicans denounce the Democratic Party’s national campaign theme: “This is a white man’s country: Let white men rule”.

October 22, 1868

While campaigning for re-election, U.S. Rep. James Hinds (R-AR) is assassinated by Democrat terrorists who were organized as the Ku Klux Klan.

December 10, 1869

Republican Gov. John Campbell of Wyoming Territory signs First-in-nation law granting women the right to vote and to hold public office.

February 3, 1870

After passing the U.S. House of Representatives with 98% Republican support and 97% Democrat opposition, the Republicans’ 15th Amendment is ratified, which granted the right to vote to all Americans regardless of race.

May 31, 1870

President Ulysses S. Grant signs the Republicans’ Enforcement Act, providing stiff penalties for depriving civil rights to any Americans.

June 22, 1870

The Republican-controlled Congress creates the U.S. Department of Justice to safeguard the civil rights of African-Americans against Democrats in the South.

September 6, 1870

Women vote in Wyoming during the first election after women’s suffrage legislation was signed into law by Republican Gov. John Campbell.

February 28, 1871

Republican Congress passes Enforcement Act providing federal protection for African-American voters.

April 20, 1871

The Republican-controlled Congress enacts the Ku Klux Klan Act, outlawing Democratic Party-affiliated terrorist groups which oppressed African-Americans.

October 10, 1871

Following warnings by Philadelphia Democrats against blacks voting, African-American Republican civil rights activist Octavius Catto was murdered by a Democratic Party operative, and his military funeral was attended by thousands.

October 18, 1871

After violence was committed against Republicans in South Carolina, Republican President Ulysses S. Grant deploys U.S. troops to combat Democrat terrorists who formed the Ku Klux Klan.

November 18, 1872

Susan B. Anthony arrested for voting, after boasting to Elizabeth Cady Stanton that she voted for “the Republican ticket, straight”.

January 17, 1874

Armed Democrats seize the Texas state government, ending Republican efforts to racially integrate the Texas government.

September 14, 1874

Democrat white supremacists seize Louisiana statehouse in attempt to overthrow the racially-integrated administration of Republican Governor William Kellogg. 27 people were killed.

March 1, 1875

The Civil Rights Act of 1875, guaranteeing access to public accommodations without regard to race, was signed by Republican President Ulysses S. Grant. The law passed with 92% Republican support over 100% Democrat opposition.

"Black men participated in Georgia politics for the first time during Congressional Reconstruction (1867-76). Between 1867 and 1872 sixty-nine African Americans served as delegates to the constitutional convention (1867-68) or as members of the state legislature.

Democrats used terror, intimidation, and the Ku Klux Klan to "redeem" the state. One quarter of the black legislators were killed, threatened, beaten, or jailed. In the December 1870 elections the Democrats won an overwhelming victory. In 1906 W. H. Rogers from McIntosh County was the last black legislator to be elected before blacks were legally disenfranchised in 1908."

Black Legislators during Reconstruction

"One of the most vivid examples of collusion between the KKK and Democratic Party was when Democrat Senator Wade Hampton ran for the governorship of South Carolina in 1876. The Klan put into action a battle plan to help Democrats win, stating: “Every Democrat must feel honor bound to control the vote of at least one Negro by intimidation…. Democrats must go in as large numbers…and well-armed.” An issue of Harper’s Weekly that same year illustrated this mindset with a depiction of two white Democrats standing next to a black man while pointing a gun at him. At the bottom of the depiction is a caption that reads: “Of Course He Wants To Vote The Democratic Ticket!”"

"The Klan’s primary mission was to intimidate Republicans -- black and white. In South Carolina, for example, the Klan even passed out “push cards” -- a hit list of 63 (50 blacks and 13 whites) “Radicals” of the legislature pictured on one side and their names listed on the other. Democrats called Republicans radicals not just because they were a powerful political force, but because they allowed blacks to participate in the political process. Apparently, this was all too much for Democrats to bear.

By 1875, Republicans, both black and white, had worked together to pass over two dozen civil rights bills. Unfortunately, their momentum came to a screeching halt in 1876 when the Democratic Party took control of Congress. Hell bent on preventing blacks from voting, Southern Democrats devised nearly a dozen shady schemes, like requiring literacy tests, misleading election procedures, redrawing election lines, changing polling locations, creating white-only primaries, and even rewriting state constitutions. Talk about disenfranchising black voters!

There were also lynchings, but not what you might think. According to the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law, between 1882 and 1964 an estimated 3,446 blacks and 1,279 whites were lynched at the hands of the Klan."


Articles: The Secret Racist History of the Democratic Party
The KKK endorsed Trump this year. Who cares what they did 100 years ago?
The Myth of the Racist Republicans
Yet it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.
There are 13 Congressional Volumes which detail how the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party for the express purpose of taking back their statehouses from BLACK REPUBLICANS through force and intimidation.

Full text of "Report of the Joint select committee appointed to inquire in to the condition of affairs in the late insurrectionary states : so far as regards the execution of the laws, and the safety of the lives and property of the citizens of the United States and Testimony taken"

Yet it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.
 
"Well regulated" is part of the 2nd amendment.
Well regulated does not mean regulations. When the Constitution specifies regulations it specifically states who and what is being regulated. The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. The fundamental purpose of the militia was to serve as a check upon a standing army, the words “well regulated” referred to the necessity that the armed citizens making up the militia have the necessary equipment and training necessary to be an effective and formidable check upon the national government’s standing army. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.

Exactly. You will find yourself trying to explain this time and time again around here though. They just don't get it or they REFUSE to get it.
They refuse to believe it because they refuse to believe they could be wrong about what they believe.
 
The KKK endorsed Trump this year. Who cares what they did 100 years ago?
The Myth of the Racist Republicans
Yet it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.
There are 13 Congressional Volumes which detail how the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party for the express purpose of taking back their statehouses from BLACK REPUBLICANS through force and intimidation.

Full text of "Report of the Joint select committee appointed to inquire in to the condition of affairs in the late insurrectionary states : so far as regards the execution of the laws, and the safety of the lives and property of the citizens of the United States and Testimony taken"

Yet it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.

And yet it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.
 
Yet it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.
There are 13 Congressional Volumes which detail how the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party for the express purpose of taking back their statehouses from BLACK REPUBLICANS through force and intimidation.

Full text of "Report of the Joint select committee appointed to inquire in to the condition of affairs in the late insurrectionary states : so far as regards the execution of the laws, and the safety of the lives and property of the citizens of the United States and Testimony taken"

Yet it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.

And yet it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.


What are you? Some kind of bot? Nobody is buying your type casting.
 
Yet it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.
There are 13 Congressional Volumes which detail how the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party for the express purpose of taking back their statehouses from BLACK REPUBLICANS through force and intimidation.

Full text of "Report of the Joint select committee appointed to inquire in to the condition of affairs in the late insurrectionary states : so far as regards the execution of the laws, and the safety of the lives and property of the citizens of the United States and Testimony taken"

Yet it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.

And yet it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.

 
Yet it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.
There are 13 Congressional Volumes which detail how the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party for the express purpose of taking back their statehouses from BLACK REPUBLICANS through force and intimidation.

Full text of "Report of the Joint select committee appointed to inquire in to the condition of affairs in the late insurrectionary states : so far as regards the execution of the laws, and the safety of the lives and property of the citizens of the United States and Testimony taken"

Yet it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.

And yet it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.


What are you? Some kind of bot? Nobody is buying your type casting.

Nobody's addressing my comment either. Would you care to?
 
Yet it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.
There are 13 Congressional Volumes which detail how the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party for the express purpose of taking back their statehouses from BLACK REPUBLICANS through force and intimidation.

Full text of "Report of the Joint select committee appointed to inquire in to the condition of affairs in the late insurrectionary states : so far as regards the execution of the laws, and the safety of the lives and property of the citizens of the United States and Testimony taken"

Yet it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.

And yet it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.


That doesn't address my reply about how it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.
 
Liberal democrats are the worst racists. They will trash any black person who doesn't tow the party line. They obviously think that black people are not capable of looking at a situation and making their OWN decisions.
 
There are 13 Congressional Volumes which detail how the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party for the express purpose of taking back their statehouses from BLACK REPUBLICANS through force and intimidation.

Full text of "Report of the Joint select committee appointed to inquire in to the condition of affairs in the late insurrectionary states : so far as regards the execution of the laws, and the safety of the lives and property of the citizens of the United States and Testimony taken"

Yet it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.

And yet it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.


What are you? Some kind of bot? Nobody is buying your type casting.

Nobody's addressing my comment either. Would you care to?


I already did. Like I said, you are typecasting and nothing more. All kinds of people live in the south.
 
Leave it to the libs to be frightened of a couple of goons wearing sheets. Lol. Americans have spoken, and we want change! If that has to come at the hands of someone like Trump, then so be it.

We?

We want change?

you see that's what I find hard to understand.

you never wanted Mr Trump.

You wanted Gary Johnson

Please lets be clear here ok?
 
Hillary Clinton is out, Donald Trump won.
So we know that she is not going to be tried or convicted of anything that would put her in jail, so that speculative conversation is pretty much nothing more than a futile waste of time.he
What we do know is that she is most likely sick, here is my suggestion or request.
What do you say we go ahead and focus on Trump and what he will or will not do vs what he promised during his campaign, lets put the pressure on him to make good on the reasons we voted for him.
As far as hillary goes, she ran a nasty campaign, so did Trump. But now that she is out of the picture, I think it would be the decent thing to let her live out the rest of her life in peace regardless of what we think she did. Lets take the upper hand on this one and let her live the rest of her life with whatever dignity she is able to salvage.
We have more important things to discuss now. As in, just how much of what Donald Trump said was lies. I think we all know that at least some of his promises were empty, but the question is how many of them were.
Of course with me, if he builds a wall, thats all he really needs to do.
but again lets try to leave Hillary to her own now. If she does something new thats different but we have pretty much run her past into the ground.
Like she said during the third debate. They go low, we go high. ( I actually did like that quote from her writers)


I've been advocating the laws of the country be followed, why would I become a hypocrite and say give the bitch a pass? Jessie jackassson was on TV begging maobama to give her a blanket pardon without her even being charged. I don't think this would be constitutional and would file a suit in federal court for him exceeding his constitutional authority. Ford's pardon of Nixon was never challenged and it should have been.
 
There are 13 Congressional Volumes which detail how the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party for the express purpose of taking back their statehouses from BLACK REPUBLICANS through force and intimidation.

Full text of "Report of the Joint select committee appointed to inquire in to the condition of affairs in the late insurrectionary states : so far as regards the execution of the laws, and the safety of the lives and property of the citizens of the United States and Testimony taken"

Yet it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.

And yet it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.


That doesn't address my reply about how it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.

I did address it. The more Republican the south became the less racist it became.

The Myth of the Racist Republicans
 
Yet it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.

And yet it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.


That doesn't address my reply about how it's the republican south that currently celebrates the Confederacy, opposes civil rights, wants to legalize discrimination, and demonizes Abraham Lincoln.

I can't help but point out that you completely ignored that in your response.

I did address it. The more Republican the south became the less racist it became.

The Myth of the Racist Republicans


I think MOST people are not racists. True racists are a very small minority. Liberals are just nuts who want to call everyone who disagrees with their policies "racists." It's become so monotonous and entirely ineffective but they keep at it, being the stuper troopers that they are! :D
 
It should be clear to you leftists, that the American people are tired of you calling them names and making false accusations about them. Smarten up or you will NEVER win another election.
 
Maybe "Maryland Patriots" might be too young to remember what democrats did to the Nixon administration. You can bet your ass that they would have put Nixon behind bars for the convoluted Watergate conspiracy if he wasn't pardoned by Jerry Ford. Democrats have a built in hatred and vindictiveness that trumps (pardon the pun) understanding unless you factor in the propaganda value of the so-called mainstream media. Timid republicans don't have the same psychotic fire in their belly as the liberal media has so it would still be a victory for republicans if Obama took the time to pardon the former democrat presidential nominee.
Ah...that's what this was all about....revenge for Nixon.
 
Maybe "Maryland Patriots" might be too young to remember what democrats did to the Nixon administration. You can bet your ass that they would have put Nixon behind bars for the convoluted Watergate conspiracy if he wasn't pardoned by Jerry Ford. Democrats have a built in hatred and vindictiveness that trumps (pardon the pun) understanding unless you factor in the propaganda value of the so-called mainstream media. Timid republicans don't have the same psychotic fire in their belly as the liberal media has so it would still be a victory for republicans if Obama took the time to pardon the former democrat presidential nominee.
Ah...that's what this was all about....revenge for Nixon.
its funny that you would mention Nixon, having been old enough during that period to see what was going on, and being old enough to know the countries general feelings toward the sitting president regardless of party, I noticed that after Nixon stepped down, every president since then has been treated with less and less respect, and they have been the subject of scrutiny regarding their character and past dealings in life. The call for impeachment has been non-stop since then, each party trying to outdo the last when it comes to proving their opponents side is more deplorable than anyone that has ever held the job.
Prior to Nixon, the campaigns were more respectful toward each other and the focus was more on a problem, or problems of the day and how the individual candidate planned to address those problems.
Its almost as though the public put presidents on a pedestal, they were men of unfaultable character regardless of party. Most people held the president and the office in the highest of respect.
I think that the Watergate scandal brought all of that to an end, from that point on the countries citizens realized that the president was no better or worse than any other man walking the face of the planet, he had faults and his ideas were not always right.
Maybe it had to do with Viet Nam going on at the same time, I remember college students catching Nixon at one of the monuments one evening and they spoke to him, and he spoke to them, according to a friend of mine that "claimed" to be there that night, when they said to Nixon, "you don't have the power to stop this war do you?" he replied that he did not, that the power fell in others hands. the early 70s were a turning point in American politics where respect for the president was basically lost to a degree, It was realized that he did have faults, he was not the one in total control as once viewed. And, a new way to fight Washington was born with the ability to question the very man that people once looked up to. looking back, I think that Watergate just might have been a major turning point in American politics and how the people saw their elected officials. they were no longer celebrities, they were now just normal everyday men working a government job, they could be bought, sold and traded.
But, all of that behind us, I still say that we as citizens back away from the Clinton scandals and let the government take care of it as they wish, we should focus on what affects us right now today and that is still obama and without question it is and will be Trump. They should be our main focus, every moment we spend looking at Hillary is a moment they have out of sight to mess something else up, to try and get something past us.
So lets focus more on them, less on her and at the same time less on party and more on substance of the man/woman in the office. We can change things but we cant do unless we are watching them every minute of every day.
Trump can go either way, it could be a good thing or it could be the biggest mistake ever made in the history of the world. ok, 2nd biggest, I doubt he will be able to exceed the mistake factor of Hitler.
Just like trickle down economics wont work, either will trickle down change, it all has to come from the bottom up.
 
Leave it to the libs to be frightened of a couple of goons wearing sheets. Lol. Americans have spoken, and we want change! If that has to come at the hands of someone like Trump, then so be it.

We?

We want change?

you see that's what I find hard to understand.

you never wanted Mr Trump.

You wanted Gary Johnson

Please lets be clear here ok?

Third party candidates are change! You don't even live here in this country and don't even have a vote, so your opinions don't mean anything. Lol. ;) OK?
 

Forum List

Back
Top