- Thread starter
- #141
If you were serious you would change your appalling avatar.
A happy family is appalling! This ain't helping at all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you were serious you would change your appalling avatar.
You have seen 20-rd magazines.please explain.It is -quite- difficult to have an intelligent conversation w/ people that do not understand the basic terminology of that conversation.
Never mind that there's no such thing as a 20-rd clip, for any gun.
I have seen 20 round clips...well actually....2x10 round clips come to think of it...based on the size of the mag
Clips and magazines are entirely different things.
A clip feeds ammo into a magazine.
No, its not.You have seen 20-rd magazines.please explain.
I have seen 20 round clips...well actually....2x10 round clips come to think of it...based on the size of the mag
Clips and magazines are entirely different things.
A clip feeds ammo into a magazine.
Yes....thats what I said,,,
No, you have not.I have seen 20 round clips
No, its not.You have seen 20-rd magazines.
Clips and magazines are entirely different things.
A clip feeds ammo into a magazine.
Yes....thats what I said,,,
You said:
No, you have not.I have seen 20 round clips
If you were serious you would change your appalling avatar.
A happy family is appalling! This ain't helping at all.
Much better to have things regulated like delaying an airport expansion for four years due to the possibility a specific fruit bat might live in the area.
Create criminal protections that guarantee crimnals more rights than victims in every case.
Wanting to define how each person should act and live under the guise of helping and caring.
Lighten Up."Rush" has done the same thing more than a couple of times for fun. It's all good. In his own way, maybe Midcan5 is learning from Rush. I say we chip in and get him a Gitmo Mug for his hot chocolate.
There's not much to figure out.I was just thinking out loud...sorry...wasnt meant to be adversarial.Aside from this being irrlevant to what I said...Something you wouldnt be able to do if the weapon itself were not legal in the US.
What makes you say that?
Trying to figure this whole debate out...thats all.
There's not much to figure out.I was just thinking out loud...sorry...wasnt meant to be adversarial.Aside from this being irrlevant to what I said...
What makes you say that?
Trying to figure this whole debate out...thats all.
People who know little or nothing about guns continually argue unsound positions regarding them. You can be 'open minded' and listen to these people if you like, but in the end, their positions are -shown- to be unsound, and thus, thoroughly discardable.
I have been converted, years of common sense conservative and republican thought have won me over. I am saved. But I will need help as I transition a mind lost so long in liberalism. So please correct any lingering liberal ideas as I reform myself.
I now believe: Freedom is all you need and government should leave us alone. The Federal deficit started in 2009. Unions and teachers are the fault of our educational woes. Fannie and Freddie all by themselves caused the financial meltdown. The unemployed are not looking for jobs and are lazy to boot. Taxes are bad bad bad. Corporations are the best and really honest people. Global warming is a fraud made up by tree huggers. Our founding principles were perfect, Ms Bachmann showed me the way. Slavery was really kinda nice. Social Security, Medicare, and Healthcare are socialism. Minimum wage is too high and outsourcing is just great. Joe McCarthy was just one super guy. And Sarah, Glenn, and Michelle Bachmann are super patriots who really know history. Any criticism of American policy is anti American hate. Am I right so far?
So fellow conservatives, republicans, tea partyers, and righties, what have I missed? Help me see more of the light.
But you DO need to know something of the subject matter - else, you're speaking from ignorance.You do not need to know the ins and outs of any legislation to dsicuss the vitrues or evils of the result of the legislation.
If people would accept their ignorance and learn from what they are told, you'd have a point. Most often, they simply decide to remain ignorant.Actually, learning the ins and outs is what the debate is for.
I have three. Each of them is suitable for any lawful purpose one might have for a gun, not the least of which is the excercise of the right to self-defense, individually or collectively.Please tell me why you would need a semi atomatic weapon with a magazine that holds 30+ rounds
Does limited government mean doing away with consumer protection?
Does freedom and liberty mean the freedom to move your factory to Asia and then get a tax break for doing so?
Does equal rights mean equality for some Americans but not all?
Are corporations trusted more than government? Should corporations be held to any accountability at all, or is this just limiting their freedom?
Should the religious views of some Americans be celebrated while the views of other Americans be repressed?
Are property rights more precious than civil rights?
If some speech is too dangerous to be expressed, are some guns too dangerous to be fired?
She made lots of money, why did she not save more if it to PROVE that people with vurtually NO extra income could survive to old age without it?
She knew she needed the money and hid her taking of it from the public.
Now if she felt intitiled to it like ALL who pay in then she sould have proudly taken it in full view of her public.
I think she was intitled to it, she paid in like everyone else.
There was no need to hide that she took it was there.
Paul Ryan received it as a child when his father died and his father paid into it and it saved the Ryan family.
SS has saved many families this way and sholuld continue to save many families this way as it was designed to do.
Its a great progam.
Very good Point there that most have missed.
Rand DID prove herself to be WRONG.
Quite an assumption.
If she had all the money the government confiscated in order to fund the Ponzi scam of SS she very well might have had millions more dollars.
But I guess we'll never know will we?
Very good Point there that most have missed.
Rand DID prove herself to be WRONG.
Quite an assumption.
If she had all the money the government confiscated in order to fund the Ponzi scam of SS she very well might have had millions more dollars.
But I guess we'll never know will we?
Ohh she only drew something like 10K from SS. Her big payoff was Medicare which had only been in existence for 6 years. She could not have paid in very much in 6 years
But you DO need to know something of the subject matter - else, you're speaking from ignorance.You do not need to know the ins and outs of any legislation to dsicuss the vitrues or evils of the result of the legislation.
If people would accept their ignorance and learn from what they are told, you'd have a point. Most often, they simply decide to remain ignorant.Actually, learning the ins and outs is what the debate is for.
I have three. Each of them is suitable for any lawful purpose one might have for a gun, not the least of which is the excercise of the right to self-defense, individually or collectively.Please tell me why you would need a semi atomatic weapon with a magazine that holds 30+ rounds
I "need" one like I "need" to be able to express my opinion by covering a statue of Mary in feces and dropping it into a vase full of dog urine, or like I "need" to be able to vote form whomever I choose.
I -use- my rifles for several things - primarily several different forms of competition as well has personal defense, both of the home and away from same. The rifles in question are among the most effective platforms for each.But I am asking you....what is that reason you feel the need to own one or more guns with 30 round mags?
Its -impossible- to have a reasoned discussion about a subject that you know nothing about.As for the other stuff you said...becuase you do not know ICD-9 and CPT4 (assuming you dont) does that mean it is irrespoinsible for you to debate healthcare?
Does limited government mean doing away with consumer protection?
No. Consumer protection is a viable cause...within reason. The FDA is vital to ensure we do not consume things that are toxic.
Does freedom and liberty mean the freedom to move your factory to Asia and then get a tax break for doing so?
Sure...some do it. Most dont. Freedom allows for this.
Does equal rights mean equality for some Americans but not all?
Other than the fact that a black man and a gay man both have the right to claim "hate crime" which will result in a stiffer penalty to the assailant, who else gets more "rights" than others?
Are corporations trusted more than government? Should corporations be held to any accountability at all, or is this just limiting their freedom?
Corporations either earn or lose our trust by their actions. If you want to invest in a company, do your research and if you lose, so be it. You certainly wont be claiming "foul" if you win with the investment.
Should the religious views of some Americans be celebrated while the views of other Americans be repressed?
Who is saying we should celebrate anyones religious views? However, all should have the right to celebrate their own...thus why companies have "personal days" and "floating holidays"
Are property rights more precious than civil rights?
Why should one preculude the other?
If some speech is too dangerous to be expressed, are some guns too dangerous to be fired?
I beleive yes to both.