flacaltenn
Diamond Member
That's mutually exclusive thought. I can't agree. Medical breakthroughs may have actually been greater without health insurance companies ever existing.
My mother isn't the only person over 75 to tell me she probably wouldn't be alive if not for Medicare.
Voluntary participation in Medicare for all at a rate based on age is one solution. Though the single payer option would remove a lot of expensive cars from the garages of insurance executives, so there's all those jobs in detailing that will be lost if some of the extreme profitability is shaved off the bureaucracies we pay to track health care expenditures.
I'll not argue Medicare as I support it, however we are way beyond that
If we actually want a solution to the high cost of medical services we must reduce the cost of delivery
Anyone who knows anyone who works in a clinic can tell you why the cost is so high
Problem is, to actually reduce that cost, it would likely cost a lot of those people their jobs. Yet, it is the solution.
1/2 the folks in a GP med office are for rules compliance, insurance and billing. Doctors are just now realizing that they can work free - er and more efficiently by offering contracts direct to patients. That's the way to go here for general care.
If my doctor would give me the same discount as he gives Aetna -- I'd pay him cash and 10% more. He has lower overhead and our visit isn't micromanaged by 3 layers of insurance and govt... I'd even pay them monthly on subscription.. Pick up a Catastrophic Coverage plan and your 1/2 way there.