progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 63,459
- 38,857
- 2,615
of course an amendment is required,, just read the constitution instead of repeating what other people tell you,,,No amendment required. See the Militia Act of 1903, also known as the Dick Act.
No, the problem with any written document, including the Constitution, someone has to be the arbiter of what it says.
That someone is the Supreme Court, whose power of 'Judicial Review", which, by default, equals 'interpretation', was established in Marbury v Madison.
You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of the Supreme Court's function.
no person is the arbiter of what it says,, thats just stupid since the people in charge changes constantly and it would put the country in chaos with the next person interpretation,,
all you have to do is read your own comments and be honest with yourself and you will see why most of what youve said is wrong,,,