If Libs #BelieveTheSurvivors, Why Didn't They Believe Juanita Broaderick That Clinton Raped Her?

[Timmy]

Why don’t you hop into a time machine, go back 25 years, and lecturer mid 90s Democrats .

 

[Timmy]

So please set us straight, since Bill Clinton raped, it is OK that Kavanaugh attempted rape but was too drunk to finish his dirty deed, and this for some bizarre twist of moral reality makes Kavanaugh an OK guy and a fine scotus example? You righties are a joke, do any of you ever think for even a second. Any of you?

THERE IS NO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE THAT KAVANAUGH EVEN TOUCHED FORD, Foolish One! Her story is filled with so many contradictions, memory gaps, conveniences and even anachronisms, there is no court on this planet that would consider this story remotely credible. My god, most of Dr. Ford's OWN WITNESSES have said she's a lying manipulator!

What contradiction? How about Kavs story? What a crock of shit!

 

[Lesh]

So please set us straight, since Bill Clinton raped, it is OK that Kavanaugh attempted rape but was too drunk to finish his dirty deed, and this for some bizarre twist of moral reality makes Kavanaugh an OK guy and a fine scotus example? You righties are a joke, do any of you ever think for even a second. Any of you?

Remember what happened to Clinton? Impeached...disbarred. I think we are hearing from these posters that the same should happen to Kavanaugh.

Clinton lied UNDER oath a very serious charge. Kavenaugh has not.

He has repeatedly lied under oath.

Most notably claiming he was of legal drinking age through most of this.

He was not

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

And why isn't Bill in jail? Ah the endless disgusting, self-righteous, swamp creature hypocrisy of libtards...

This fails as a straw man fallacy.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

So please set us straight, since Bill Clinton raped, it is OK that Kavanaugh attempted rape but was too drunk to finish his dirty deed, and this for some bizarre twist of moral reality makes Kavanaugh an OK guy and a fine scotus example? You righties are a joke, do any of you ever think for even a second. Any of you?

Thanks for the perfect example of twisted libtard logic, will try to address what I think you were trying to say even though you failed miserably. First, not a rightie. Don't want Kavanaugh confirmed because of his political views. Second, Who said if Bill Clinton raped it's ok for Kavanaugh to attempt rape? I am merely pointing out how you libtards (which are a breed apart from honest progressives) erect different standards and views depending on your political agenda. If it involves your darling Bill Clinton, he can do no wrong. If it involves a hapless drunk who is a bad nominee, "We MUST BELIEVE THE SURVIVORS!" Even though calling them survivors already presumes the guilt of the opposing party. See how slimy they are? I just want a fair process for anyone, and I don't believe anyone just because it is a woman or a man. Anyone can lie. Let's sit them down for as long as it takes and get to the bottom of it.

No, it’s you and most others on the dishonest right incapable of logic and reason – all you have are ridiculous lies, this thread premise being an example.

You have no ‘evidence’ that ‘all liberals’ have an opinion one way or the other concerning Juanita Broaderick and Clinton, or who ‘all liberals’ believed or didn’t believe; consequently, your thread fails as a fallacy, devoid of facts and merit.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

And why isn't Bill in jail? Ah the endless disgusting, self-righteous, swamp creature hypocrisy of libtards...

Which statement by Broaderick do we believe? The sworn statement where she said Clinton didn't rape her? Or now when, unsworn, she says he did?

Who cares!?! Clinton is no longer in office. Dems are hypocrites. Everyone knows this. How about Ellison? You believe his accuser?

Juanita Broaderick has not had her justice, according to her, and now according to the standards and rules supporters of Bill Clinton have put in place. "Believe the women." But it's Bill Clinton. She should keep talking. At some point the rank hypocrisy of the Democratic wing of the Deep State becomes too much to bear and the whole thing comes crashing down.

Nonsense.

You’re making this idiocy up, absent any evidence of what ‘supporters’ of Clinton believe.

You’ve contrived this moronic thread based on your subjective, errant assumptions about Clinton ‘supporters.’

Your thread also fails as a false comparison fallacy – unlike Kavanaugh, Clinton neither holds nor is seeking public office, having no bearing whatsoever concerning Kavanaugh’s act of sexual assault or whether he’s fit to be on the Supreme Court.

 

[Bush92]

And why isn't Bill in jail? Ah the endless disgusting, self-righteous, swamp creature hypocrisy of libtards...

Because liberals are phony as fuck all.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

And why isn't Bill in jail? Ah the endless disgusting, self-righteous, swamp creature hypocrisy of libtards...

Which statement by Broaderick do we believe? The sworn statement where she said Clinton didn't rape her? Or now when, unsworn, she says he did?

Who cares!?! Clinton is no longer in office. Dems are hypocrites. Everyone knows this. How about Ellison? You believe his accuser?

Juanita Broaderick has not had her justice, according to her, and now according to the standards and rules supporters of Bill Clinton have put in place. "Believe the women." But it's Bill Clinton. She should keep talking. At some point the rank hypocrisy of the Democratic wing of the Deep State becomes too much to bear and the whole thing comes crashing down.

Nonsense.

You’re making this idiocy up, absent any evidence of what ‘supporters’ of Clinton believe.

You’ve contrived this moronic thread based on your subjective, errant assumptions about Clinton ‘supporters.’

Your thread also fails as a false comparison fallacy – unlike Kavanaugh, Clinton neither holds nor is seeking public office, having no bearing whatsoever concerning Kavanaugh’s act of sexual assault or whether he’s fit to be on the Supreme Court.

Are you drunk? LMAO

 

[Harry Dresden]

And why isn't Bill in jail? Ah the endless disgusting, self-righteous, swamp creature hypocrisy of libtards...

This fails as a straw man fallacy.

was that a red herring fallacy?.....

 

[Harry Dresden]

So please set us straight, since Bill Clinton raped, it is OK that Kavanaugh attempted rape but was too drunk to finish his dirty deed, and this for some bizarre twist of moral reality makes Kavanaugh an OK guy and a fine scotus example? You righties are a joke, do any of you ever think for even a second. Any of you?

Thanks for the perfect example of twisted libtard logic, will try to address what I think you were trying to say even though you failed miserably. First, not a rightie. Don't want Kavanaugh confirmed because of his political views. Second, Who said if Bill Clinton raped it's ok for Kavanaugh to attempt rape? I am merely pointing out how you libtards (which are a breed apart from honest progressives) erect different standards and views depending on your political agenda. If it involves your darling Bill Clinton, he can do no wrong. If it involves a hapless drunk who is a bad nominee, "We MUST BELIEVE THE SURVIVORS!" Even though calling them survivors already presumes the guilt of the opposing party. See how slimy they are? I just want a fair process for anyone, and I don't believe anyone just because it is a woman or a man. Anyone can lie. Let's sit them down for as long as it takes and get to the bottom of it.

No, it’s you and most others on the dishonest right incapable of logic and reason – all you have are ridiculous lies, this thread premise being an example.

You have no ‘evidence’ that ‘all liberals’ have an opinion one way or the other concerning Juanita Broaderick and Clinton, or who ‘all liberals’ believed or didn’t believe; consequently, your thread fails as a fallacy, devoid of facts and merit.

your not going to start crying are you jones?.....

 

[Harry Dresden]

And why isn't Bill in jail? Ah the endless disgusting, self-righteous, swamp creature hypocrisy of libtards...

Which statement by Broaderick do we believe? The sworn statement where she said Clinton didn't rape her? Or now when, unsworn, she says he did?

Who cares!?! Clinton is no longer in office. Dems are hypocrites. Everyone knows this. How about Ellison? You believe his accuser?

Juanita Broaderick has not had her justice, according to her, and now according to the standards and rules supporters of Bill Clinton have put in place. "Believe the women." But it's Bill Clinton. She should keep talking. At some point the rank hypocrisy of the Democratic wing of the Deep State becomes too much to bear and the whole thing comes crashing down.

Nonsense.

You’re making this idiocy up, absent any evidence of what ‘supporters’ of Clinton believe.

You’ve contrived this moronic thread based on your subjective, errant assumptions about Clinton ‘supporters.’

Your thread also fails as a false comparison fallacy – unlike Kavanaugh, Clinton neither holds nor is seeking public office, having no bearing whatsoever concerning Kavanaugh’s act of sexual assault or whether he’s fit to be on the Supreme Court.

Jones at least wipe your nose.....geezus.....

 

[munkle]

And why isn't Bill in jail? Ah the endless disgusting, self-righteous, swamp creature hypocrisy of libtards...

Which statement by Broaderick do we believe? The sworn statement where she said Clinton didn't rape her? Or now when, unsworn, she says he did?

Who cares!?! Clinton is no longer in office. Dems are hypocrites. Everyone knows this. How about Ellison? You believe his accuser?

Juanita Broaderick has not had her justice, according to her, and now according to the standards and rules supporters of Bill Clinton have put in place. "Believe the women." But it's Bill Clinton. She should keep talking. At some point the rank hypocrisy of the Democratic wing of the Deep State becomes too much to bear and the whole thing comes crashing down.

Nonsense.

You’re making this idiocy up, absent any evidence of what ‘supporters’ of Clinton believe.

You’ve contrived this moronic thread based on your subjective, errant assumptions about Clinton ‘supporters.’

Your thread also fails as a false comparison fallacy – unlike Kavanaugh, Clinton neither holds nor is seeking public office, having no bearing whatsoever concerning Kavanaugh’s act of sexual assault or whether he’s fit to be on the Supreme Court.

Jones at least wipe your nose.....geezus.....

lol Juanita just started a White House petition to re-open Bill Clinton case, wonder how the libs will react to this.