If Obama believes in Global Warming why did he buy oceanfront property at Martha's Vineyard?

Two different things, Frank. CO2 lagging temperature is proof that CO2 has never driven climate changes. But that doesn't mean it has no effect on temperature. It's just not much of an effect at these concentrations because of the logarithmic relationship between concentration and associated surface temperature.
But you have no interest in seeing any lab experiments controlling for CO2 at these levels?

The reason we’re never shown any lab experiments demonstrating an irrefutable link between increasing CO2 from 280 to 400ppm and increases in temperature is because there are no increases in temperature at these levels

We’re supposed to spend $3 Trillion annually for what exactly??

Lower CO2?

Windmill??

Fund more models??

It’s insanity
 
Incorrect. 1C per doubling of CO2. That's it. It's not 4.5C or 0 C.


LOL!!

Highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere before being FUDGED in 2005

Double zero and you still get ZERO.
 
The reason we’re never shown any lab experiments demonstrating an irrefutable link between increasing CO2 from 280 to 400ppm and increases in temperature is because there are no increases in temperature at these levels
In the real world, a non-linear increase from 280 to 420 ppm CO2 has raised temperatures 1.4C over a period of ~175 years. Are you insisting that an experiment be run with those specific CO2 values for that length of time?
 
No evidence?
View attachment 1001717
View attachment 1001715
View attachment 1001716



Crock is just a FUDGE FACTORY
 
In the real world, a non-linear increase from 280 to 420 ppm CO2 has raised temperatures 1.4C over a period of ~175 years. Are you insisting that an experiment be run with those specific CO2 values for that length of time?
No. No. No! NO!

If what you claim is true, that increasing CO2 from 280 to 400 PPM raises temperatures, you should have countless lab experiments replicating that result

If what you claim was true, and it isn’t, then the instantaneous, calamitous, horrific increase in CO2 would INSTANTLY cause the described temperature increase

You should also be able to show us how increasing from 280 to 320 increase .4C, etc

But you have zero repeatable experiments replicating that result. Zero. None. Zip. Nada!

It’s insanity that keeps you droning on and attempting to gaslight skeptics
 
But you have no interest in seeing any lab experiments controlling for CO2 at these levels?

The reason we’re never shown any lab experiments demonstrating an irrefutable link between increasing CO2 from 280 to 400ppm and increases in temperature is because there are no increases in temperature at these levels

We’re supposed to spend $3 Trillion annually for what exactly??

Lower CO2?

Windmill??

Fund more models??

It’s insanity
I'm happy to accept the theoretical value from physics as the most it can be. It's an instantaneous phenomenon. 1C per doubling of CO2 is insignificant. In reality it is most likely less because of convective currents.
 

Forum List

Back
Top