CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 147,855
- 71,063
- 2,330
We’re all still breathlessly waiting the AGWCult posting an experiment controlling for CO2Since they require evidence and you do not, how do you come to that conclusion?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We’re all still breathlessly waiting the AGWCult posting an experiment controlling for CO2Since they require evidence and you do not, how do you come to that conclusion?
We’re all still breathlessly waiting the AGWCult posting an experiment controlling for CO2
We’re all still breathlessly waiting the AGWCult posting an experiment controlling for CO2Since they require evidence and you do not, how do you come to that conclusion?
View attachment 1001300
View attachment 1001304![]()
Global Temperature and Human Activity | Econofact
The relationship between temperature and greenhouse gas emissions can be analyzed using economic methods, which provide external validation of climate models.econofact.org
View attachment 1001308![]()
Analysis: Why scientists think 100% of global warming is due to humans - Carbon Brief
The science on the human contribution to modern warming is quite clear. Humans emissions and activities have caused around 100% of the warming observed.www.carbonbrief.org
View attachment 1001309Causes of Climate Change | Climate Change Science | US EPA
19january2017snapshot.epa.gov
![]()
Causes of Climate Change | US EPA
Burning fossil fuels changes the climate more than any other human activity.www.epa.gov
It's far better than you actually deserve Frank.We’re all still breathlessly waiting the AGWCult posting an experiment controlling for CO2
See?
Still not an experiment controlling for CO2!
Amazing!
You showed us you won't control for CO2, yet expect us to believe CO2 became a G-d molecule in 1850, suddenly DRIVING the climate, an 800,000 year dataset showing CO2 lagging for 800,000 years notwithstanding
You posted Cult banners, not science
What is the instantaneous GHG effect of a doubling of CO2 absent any feedbacks?It's far better than you actually deserve Frank.