If Trump comes out on Russia's side Friday, there will be a huge demand to see his Tax Returns.

[Eloy]

The Donald and every rational person side with the truth, not the false dichotomy by the butthurt brigades! The truth is Russia did not provide the DNC emails to Wikileaks! Get over it!

The CIA says differently.

The same CIA also said that Saddam Hussein had WMDs and look at the consequences.

During George W Bush's time, the CIA was a tool of the Executive and said what Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld told them to say.

 

[edthecynic]

The Donald and every rational person side with the truth, not the false dichotomy by the butthurt brigades! The truth is Russia did not provide the DNC emails to Wikileaks! Get over it!

The CIA says differently.

The same CIA also said that Saddam Hussein had WMDs and look at the consequences.

Actually, the CIA said there were NO WMDs before Cheney forged the intel!

"We do not have any direct evidence that Iraq has used the period since Desert Fox to reconstitute its WMD programs"
-George Tenet, CIA Director, 2/07/2001

 

[rdean]

Isn't this woman going to be Trump's propaganda director or something?

You gotta watch this video.

Trump's keeping a list.

 

[defcon4]

The Donald and every rational person side with the truth, not the false dichotomy by the butthurt brigades! The truth is Russia did not provide the DNC emails to Wikileaks! Get over it!

The CIA says differently.

The same CIA also said that Saddam Hussein had WMDs and look at the consequences.

Actually, the CIA said there were NO WMDs before Cheney forged the intel!

"We do not have any direct evidence that Iraq has used the period since Desert Fox to reconstitute its WMD programs"
-George Tenet, CIA Director, 2/07/2001

Source?

 

[Eloy]

The Donald and every rational person side with the truth, not the false dichotomy by the butthurt brigades! The truth is Russia did not provide the DNC emails to Wikileaks! Get over it!

The CIA says differently.

The same CIA also said that Saddam Hussein had WMDs and look at the consequences.

Actually, the CIA said there were NO WMDs before Cheney forged the intel!

"We do not have any direct evidence that Iraq has used the period since Desert Fox to reconstitute its WMD programs"
-George Tenet, CIA Director, 2/07/2001

Source?

You were told in the post: "We do not have any direct evidence that Iraq has used the period since Desert Fox to reconstitute its WMD programs"
-George Tenet, CIA Director, 2/07/2001

 

[defcon4]

The Donald and every rational person side with the truth, not the false dichotomy by the butthurt brigades! The truth is Russia did not provide the DNC emails to Wikileaks! Get over it!

The CIA says differently.

The same CIA also said that Saddam Hussein had WMDs and look at the consequences.

Actually, the CIA said there were NO WMDs before Cheney forged the intel!

"We do not have any direct evidence that Iraq has used the period since Desert Fox to reconstitute its WMD programs"
-George Tenet, CIA Director, 2/07/2001

Source?

You were told in the post: "We do not have any direct evidence that Iraq has used the period since Desert Fox to reconstitute its WMD programs"
-George Tenet, CIA Director, 2/07/2001

Link it.

 

[Eloy]

The CIA says differently.

The same CIA also said that Saddam Hussein had WMDs and look at the consequences.

Actually, the CIA said there were NO WMDs before Cheney forged the intel!

"We do not have any direct evidence that Iraq has used the period since Desert Fox to reconstitute its WMD programs"
-George Tenet, CIA Director, 2/07/2001

Source?

You were told in the post: "We do not have any direct evidence that Iraq has used the period since Desert Fox to reconstitute its WMD programs"
-George Tenet, CIA Director, 2/07/2001

Link it.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/LEO306F.html

 

[rdean]

The Donald and every rational person side with the truth, not the false dichotomy by the butthurt brigades! The truth is Russia did not provide the DNC emails to Wikileaks! Get over it!

The CIA says differently.

The same CIA also said that Saddam Hussein had WMDs and look at the consequences.

Wow, terrific parrot.

First of all, it's not the same CIA. After the GOP failure of 9/11 and WMD's, the intel agencies were dramatically changed:

Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 - Public Law 108–458—Dec. 17, 2004

George W. Bush’s CIA briefer admits Iraq WMD “intelligence” was a lie

The thing is, the Iraq War was not the result of an intelligence goof — rather, the country’s top office systematically misled the public about Iraq’s nonexistent WMD program, as well as Saddam Hussein’s link to Al Qaeda.

=======================

This has been litigated so much that even every ignorant worm and bug living under a rock should know what happened. We lived through it. It's wasn't that long ago.

 

[rdean]

The CIA says differently.

The same CIA also said that Saddam Hussein had WMDs and look at the consequences.

Actually, the CIA said there were NO WMDs before Cheney forged the intel!

"We do not have any direct evidence that Iraq has used the period since Desert Fox to reconstitute its WMD programs"
-George Tenet, CIA Director, 2/07/2001

Source?

You were told in the post: "We do not have any direct evidence that Iraq has used the period since Desert Fox to reconstitute its WMD programs"
-George Tenet, CIA Director, 2/07/2001

Link it.

Strategic Threats and National Missile Defenses

 

[rdean]

The same CIA also said that Saddam Hussein had WMDs and look at the consequences.

Actually, the CIA said there were NO WMDs before Cheney forged the intel!

"We do not have any direct evidence that Iraq has used the period since Desert Fox to reconstitute its WMD programs"
-George Tenet, CIA Director, 2/07/2001

Source?

You were told in the post: "We do not have any direct evidence that Iraq has used the period since Desert Fox to reconstitute its WMD programs"
-George Tenet, CIA Director, 2/07/2001

Link it.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/LEO306F.html

You can also find it in this book:

Strategic Threats and National Missile Defenses

 

[The VOR]

“Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets. We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia,” Trump’s son, Donald Jr., said at a real estate conference in 2008, according to a trade publication, eTurboNews.

--------------------------------

Trump's own son gives us the connection.

What is the real connection? Only his tax returns will tell us.

What if Trump comes out of the meeting tomarrow suddenly converted? Will he be believable? Will he settle for working for Putin behind the scenes?

I guess we'll know tomarrow.

Anyone who believes anything drumph says is a fool.

 

[hadit]

“Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets. We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia,” Trump’s son, Donald Jr., said at a real estate conference in 2008, according to a trade publication, eTurboNews.

--------------------------------

Trump's own son gives us the connection.

What is the real connection? Only his tax returns will tell us.

What if Trump comes out of the meeting tomarrow suddenly converted? Will he be believable? Will he settle for working for Putin behind the scenes?

I guess we'll know tomarrow.

Will Trump be believable, you ask.
The answer is that Trump's supporters will believe anything he says, literally or metaphorically.
No-one else believes Trump.

Yet he defeated Hillary. Imagine that.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

from who? You Snowflakes?

Patriots.

"Rdean makes me laugh" - Patriot

 

[CrusaderFrank]

“Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets. We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia,” Trump’s son, Donald Jr., said at a real estate conference in 2008, according to a trade publication, eTurboNews.

--------------------------------

Trump's own son gives us the connection.

What is the real connection? Only his tax returns will tell us.

What if Trump comes out of the meeting tomarrow suddenly converted? Will he be believable? Will he settle for working for Putin behind the scenes?

I guess we'll know tomarrow.

Anyone who believes anything drumph says is a fool.

At this point, what difference does it make?

 

[rdean]

“Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets. We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia,” Trump’s son, Donald Jr., said at a real estate conference in 2008, according to a trade publication, eTurboNews.

--------------------------------

Trump's own son gives us the connection.

What is the real connection? Only his tax returns will tell us.

What if Trump comes out of the meeting tomarrow suddenly converted? Will he be believable? Will he settle for working for Putin behind the scenes?

I guess we'll know tomarrow.

Will Trump be believable, you ask.
The answer is that Trump's supporters will believe anything he says, literally or metaphorically.
No-one else believes Trump.

Yet he defeated Hillary. Imagine that.

Not by himself. It took the Russians, the FBI and the Media to help him out.

Trump has gotten nearly $3 billion in ‘free’ advertising

 

[rdean]

“Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets. We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia,” Trump’s son, Donald Jr., said at a real estate conference in 2008, according to a trade publication, eTurboNews.

--------------------------------

Trump's own son gives us the connection.

What is the real connection? Only his tax returns will tell us.

What if Trump comes out of the meeting tomarrow suddenly converted? Will he be believable? Will he settle for working for Putin behind the scenes?

I guess we'll know tomarrow.

Anyone who believes anything drumph says is a fool.

At this point, what difference does it make?

It matters.

 

[rdean]

Trump calls Russia election meddling allegations a 'political witch hunt'

Trump is going for his briefing in an hour or so and look at what he just said:

Trump told The New York Times on Friday that the focus on Russia is a "political witch hunt," again sowing doubts about the allegations he claims are meant to discredit his electoral win. He argued that previous breaches of U.S. institutions did not get as much attention as the Russia accusations, which have prompted Obama administration sanctions and bipartisan calls for tougher responses to cyberattacks.

What a whiney baby with tiny hands.

This pu$$y is going to be our president? Wow. Putin's bitch.

 

[easyt65]

So if the Intel Community still provides no definitive evidence to support their claim and Trump rejects their claim Liberals are going to regress back to demanding to see Trump's tax returns?

Personally I hope this issue is resolved definitively one way of the other ASAP.

 

[rdean]

So if the Intel Community still provides no definitive evidence to support their claim and Trump rejects their claim Liberals are going to regress back to demanding to see Trump's tax returns?

Personally I hope this issue is resolved definitively one way of the other ASAP.

I believe our intel community over Trump. Remember, Trump stiffs his workers. He's been proven to lie again and again.

 

[Dschrute3]