daveman
Diamond Member
I'm sure Carby is grateful for you running interference for him, but how about we let him explain the obvious dichotomy between his hand-wringing over white people stealing natives' land and him keeping his house?You seriously can't see Carby's hypocrisy? Okay. That must take a special effort.Okay, that's one.I notice that none of those folks decrying the theft of land from Native Americans has signed over title to their house to local tribespeople.
Maybe one of you can explain why your exploitation of indigenous peoples is okay.
Don't be ridiculous. Nobody is owed anything in my opinion, and I don't believe in reparations for historical crimes because it's an interminable and undefinable debt forced on people who had nothing to do with the initial crime. No man, Indian or not, is owed anything more than his own two hands work for, period. I have family who thinks the White man owes them and they live in squalor and poverty while blaming everyone else for their personal failures. I'm teaching my kids to own their own lives.
How about it, Nycarbineer? When are you giving your house to a local Indian? If you're not, why is your profiting from "forced removals of Indians from their lands" okay?
Did you bump your head? Decrying the crimes against American Indians doesn't obligate Nycarbineer to give up his home; a really asinine thought process to begin with. We aren't owed anything more than what we work for ourselves. Why is this so hard to understand? To argue that nobody can say anything about Indian genocide without having to give them their homes is just sophomoric stupidity.
It isn't hypocrisy. Your argument that people have to give their houses to American Indians in order to acknowledge what was done to them was wrong is stupid ratcheted up fortissimo. And the fact you don't see the stupidity of that argument makes you the biggest ass on this thread.