- Jul 21, 2009
- 133,077
- 69,716
Obama's Justice Department indicted former House Speaker Dennis Hastert on corruption charges. The administration wasn't very specific at first about why he was being charged, but they claimed it was over blackmail payouts he was paying to a perpetrator that will not be charged as part of the investigation.
WTF???
Isn't blackmail a felony?
Apparently not according to this administration.
I don't know which situation makes me more sick. It appears that the former speaker was being blackmailed because of something he did when he was a high school wrestling coach in the friggen 70s. You see, the administration claims that this came to their attention because Hastert was making several $9000 withdrawals that were, according to the bank, suspicious. How they put two and two together merely from this is difficult to believe. If you believe that BS then you'll believe that Global Warming is the gravest threat to the United States, or that a disgusting video was the real cause of an attack in Benghazi.
The point being not only was Hastert a scumbag but because he's a Republican he is being watched by the Obama Administration. Using the Patriot Act, the Obama Administration feels they can record emails and listen to phone conversations without a warrant. Nothing is private to this administration.
Obama doesn't just go after Republicans though. One Democrat who tried to buck the administration came under indictment simply because he wouldn't do what he was told. I'm sure everyone has heard of Robert Menendez.
How many other politicians are out there currently on the verge of indictments if they dare to do or say anything Obama doesn't like????
This indictment does two things......it brings up another Mark Foley type situation.....and it also keeps Republicans, and even Democrats (with similar pasts or just something they don't want made public) quiet, or at least keeps them from going after Obama like they normally would have. The purpose is subtle but predictable. Hillary is looking bad in the press, so a Republican needed to be targeted to balance things out. If they can make a Republican look like a pervert, it stains the entire party....even though this didn't happen while he was in office. As a result, Hillary's current and past activities don't look so bad. The fact that that she's selling us out to foreign interests and is about as phony as they come doesn't really matter in comparison.
Does it matter that the possibility exists that Hillary wouldn't be in this fix if emails to Sidney Blumenthal, a close Clinton confidant, hadn't been "leaked" to the press?
Far as I can see, this is the essence of political corruption. It means the powers that be want us to lower our standards because they want to give us the impression that everybody is corrupt....so why not elect the lying piece of shit that promises the most goodies.
Links
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/29/u...atedCoverage®ion=Marginalia&pgtype=article
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/31/us/shaken-by-charges-for-denny.html?_r=0
WTF???
Isn't blackmail a felony?
Apparently not according to this administration.
I don't know which situation makes me more sick. It appears that the former speaker was being blackmailed because of something he did when he was a high school wrestling coach in the friggen 70s. You see, the administration claims that this came to their attention because Hastert was making several $9000 withdrawals that were, according to the bank, suspicious. How they put two and two together merely from this is difficult to believe. If you believe that BS then you'll believe that Global Warming is the gravest threat to the United States, or that a disgusting video was the real cause of an attack in Benghazi.
The point being not only was Hastert a scumbag but because he's a Republican he is being watched by the Obama Administration. Using the Patriot Act, the Obama Administration feels they can record emails and listen to phone conversations without a warrant. Nothing is private to this administration.
Obama doesn't just go after Republicans though. One Democrat who tried to buck the administration came under indictment simply because he wouldn't do what he was told. I'm sure everyone has heard of Robert Menendez.
How many other politicians are out there currently on the verge of indictments if they dare to do or say anything Obama doesn't like????
This indictment does two things......it brings up another Mark Foley type situation.....and it also keeps Republicans, and even Democrats (with similar pasts or just something they don't want made public) quiet, or at least keeps them from going after Obama like they normally would have. The purpose is subtle but predictable. Hillary is looking bad in the press, so a Republican needed to be targeted to balance things out. If they can make a Republican look like a pervert, it stains the entire party....even though this didn't happen while he was in office. As a result, Hillary's current and past activities don't look so bad. The fact that that she's selling us out to foreign interests and is about as phony as they come doesn't really matter in comparison.
Does it matter that the possibility exists that Hillary wouldn't be in this fix if emails to Sidney Blumenthal, a close Clinton confidant, hadn't been "leaked" to the press?
Far as I can see, this is the essence of political corruption. It means the powers that be want us to lower our standards because they want to give us the impression that everybody is corrupt....so why not elect the lying piece of shit that promises the most goodies.
Links
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/29/u...atedCoverage®ion=Marginalia&pgtype=article
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/31/us/shaken-by-charges-for-denny.html?_r=0
Last edited: