Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hah hah and the backtracking begins. Suddenly Mr. Facts is getting wishy-washy.There are always isolated people talking about such things.
But no one was seriously using inequality as a class warfare issue to drum up anger.
NEW YORK, Jan. 31 -- President Bush acknowledged Wednesday that there is growing income inequality in the United States, addressing for the first time a subject that has long concerned Democrats and liberal economists. "The fact is that income inequality is real -- it's been rising for more than 25 years," Bush said in an address on Wall Street. "The reason is clear: We have an economy that increasingly rewards education and skills because of that education."
In some respects, Bush's remarks were an unremarkable statement of what many economists accept as common wisdom. But they appeared to represent the first time Bush has personally addressed an issue on which his administration has found itself under fierce attack from Democrats.
Haven't tried to, I've never disagreed with it. Nice flail though.You certainly weren't able to disprove that more people were working under Bush than under Obama.
Haven't tried to, I've never disagreed with it. Nice flail though.You certainly weren't able to disprove that more people were working under Bush than under Obama.
This being right thing, I don't think you get it....Oh, OK. So you admit I'm right
We never heard about inequality under Bush because people were working and earning money. SO they didnt care what others did.
NEW YORK, Jan. 31 -- President Bush acknowledged Wednesday that there is growing income inequality in the United States, addressing for the first time a subject that has long concerned Democrats and liberal economists.
"The fact is that income inequality is real -- it's been rising for more than 25 years," Bush said in an address on Wall Street. "The reason is clear: We have an economy that increasingly rewards education and skills because of that education."
In some respects, Bush's remarks were an unremarkable statement of what many economists accept as common wisdom. But they appeared to represent the first time Bush has personally addressed an issue on which his administration has found itself under fierce attack from Democrats.
This being right thing, I don't think you get it....Oh, OK. So you admit I'm right
We never heard about inequality under Bush because people were working and earning money. SO they didnt care what others did.
Bush Addresses Income Inequality
NEW YORK, Jan. 31 -- President Bush acknowledged Wednesday that there is growing income inequality in the United States, addressing for the first time a subject that has long concerned Democrats and liberal economists.
"The fact is that income inequality is real -- it's been rising for more than 25 years," Bush said in an address on Wall Street. "The reason is clear: We have an economy that increasingly rewards education and skills because of that education."
In some respects, Bush's remarks were an unremarkable statement of what many economists accept as common wisdom. But they appeared to represent the first time Bush has personally addressed an issue on which his administration has found itself under fierce attack from Democrats.
Oh yeah we never heard about inequality under Bush.... well except from Bush. Dumbass.
Good idea, flee from this thread instead of being made to look like more of a fool. How can people get so partisan that they are willing to blatantly lie to try to score points for their political team? Ask TheRabbi.The point made here is that you are an ignorant fucktard and not worth responding to.
We never heard about inequality under Bush because people were working and earning money.
Good idea, flee from this thread instead of being made to look like more of a fool. How can people get so partisan that they are willing to blatantly lie to try to score points for their political team? Ask TheRabbi.The point made here is that you are an ignorant fucktard and not worth responding to.
Let's review.
TheRabbi claims
We never heard about inequality under Bush because people were working and earning money.
And of course here is Bush himself addressing income inequality in 2007:
Bush Addresses Income Inequality
"NEW YORK, Jan. 31 -- President Bush acknowledged Wednesday that there is growing income inequality in the United States, addressing for the first time a subject that has long concerned Democrats and liberal economists. "The fact is that income inequality is real -- it's been rising for more than 25 years," Bush said in an address on Wall Street. "The reason is clear: We have an economy that increasingly rewards education and skills because of that education." In some respects, Bush's remarks were an unremarkable statement of what many economists accept as common wisdom. But they appeared to represent the first time Bush has personally addressed an issue on which his administration has found itself under fierce attack from Democrats."
TheRabbi = Lying dumbass, busted.
Good idea, flee from this thread instead of being made to look like more of a fool. How can people get so partisan that they are willing to blatantly lie to try to score points for their political team? Ask TheRabbi.The point made here is that you are an ignorant fucktard and not worth responding to.
Let's review.
TheRabbi claims
We never heard about inequality under Bush because people were working and earning money.
And of course here is Bush himself addressing income inequality in 2007:
Bush Addresses Income Inequality
"NEW YORK, Jan. 31 -- President Bush acknowledged Wednesday that there is growing income inequality in the United States, addressing for the first time a subject that has long concerned Democrats and liberal economists. "The fact is that income inequality is real -- it's been rising for more than 25 years," Bush said in an address on Wall Street. "The reason is clear: We have an economy that increasingly rewards education and skills because of that education." In some respects, Bush's remarks were an unremarkable statement of what many economists accept as common wisdom. But they appeared to represent the first time Bush has personally addressed an issue on which his administration has found itself under fierce attack from Democrats."
TheRabbi = Lying dumbass, busted.
Yeah I know, I failed to refute your "fact" that we never heard about inequality when Bush was president.
I might have trouble disproving you have a pet unicorn too.
Yeah I know, I failed to refute your "fact" that we never heard about inequality when Bush was president.
I might have trouble disproving you have a pet unicorn too.
you would have trouble showing me postive "change" too. unless you call record welfare and food stamps "forward progress"
bottom line; inequality is worse under Progressives
will so-called Progressive people sit around and whine Republicans never cared about it till now?
or just expect people to thank the Left for being nice enough to offer lots of welfare to the poor people their failed policies are CREATING?
I've made no claim to whether inequality is more or less under any ideology, nor under the leadership of either party of president.you would have trouble showing me postive "change" too. unless you call record welfare and food stamps "forward progress"
bottom line; inequality is worse under Progressives
I could see that, you already ate so much crow and humble pie you probably couldn't manage another bite.You want the rest of my sandwich? I'm not going to finish it.
And this is why you were tooled so badly in this thread, you make arguments based on irrationally rabid partisanship instead of common sense.Dems are scum.
I could see that, you already ate so much crow and humble pie you probably couldn't manage another bite.You want the rest of my sandwich? I'm not going to finish it.
And this is why you were tooled so badly in this thread, you make arguments based on irrationally rabid partisanship instead of common sense.Dems are scum.
and this is why you keep getting tooled, saying shit that is obviously wrong and easily proven false.Inequality wasn't an issue prior to Obama.
and this is why you keep getting tooled, saying shit that is obviously wrong and easily proven false.Inequality wasn't an issue prior to Obama.
Bush Addresses Income Inequality
"NEW YORK, Jan. 31 -- President Bush acknowledged Wednesday that there is growing income inequality in the United States, addressing for the first time a subject that has long concerned Democrats and liberal economists. "The fact is that income inequality is real -- it's been rising for more than 25 years," Bush said in an address on Wall Street. "The reason is clear: We have an economy that increasingly rewards education and skills because of that education." In some respects, Bush's remarks were an unremarkable statement of what many economists accept as common wisdom. But they appeared to represent the first time Bush has personally addressed an issue on which his administration has found itself under fierce attack from Democrats."
As a matter of fact, it is. When you say nobody was talking about income inequality and it is demonstrated the president and congress were talking about itYeah a speech here or there or an article somewhere isn't really proof.
Lol now there is quantitative analysis in its highest form.A Google search for "income inequality 2005" yields 6.27M hits. A search for "income inequality 2013" yields 53.3m hits, almost 10 times the number. QED, you've lost this argument.
and yes this is the first time I've seen someone trying to prove something wasn't talked about in 2005 by saying they found 6 million references to it
Says the guy who believes finding over 6 million references to an issue he says nobody talked about (besides the president and congress) is how to prove a point.You are a total fool, and have proven it numerous times.
