Inspector general who started impeachment now under investigation

Billy_Kinetta

Paladin of the Lost Hour
Mar 4, 2013
52,766
22,205
2,320
Cue Grieg's "In the Hall of the Mountain King" for background music.

The intelligence community inspector general who already had been rebuked for his handling of the whistleblower complaint that triggered the Democrats' impeachment of President Trump is under investigation, according to Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif.


Nunes: Inspector general who started impeachment now under investigation - WND
 
Totally agree that the ICIG screwed-up calling the WB "credible" without any firsthand knowledge as required by law.
At the very least Atkinson needs to be fired for incompetence before being prosecuted.
 
As much as Nunes is reliable (sarcasm) do we have another source?
 
Cue Grieg's "In the Hall of the Mountain King" for background music.

The intelligence community inspector general who already had been rebuked for his handling of the whistleblower complaint that triggered the Democrats' impeachment of President Trump is under investigation, according to Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif.


Nunes: Inspector general who started impeachment now under investigation - WND
Nunes.....:71:
Looks like harassment from the Trump administration
 
Can’t get the whistle blower?
Go after the IG
 
Cue Grieg's "In the Hall of the Mountain King" for background music.

The intelligence community inspector general who already had been rebuked for his handling of the whistleblower complaint that triggered the Democrats' impeachment of President Trump is under investigation, according to Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif.


Nunes: Inspector general who started impeachment now under investigation - WND

Under investigation by who? Who is conducting this "investigation"? Nunes? Does he have time? He's really busy suing fake cows...
 
Can’t get the whistle blower?
Go after the IG

They're both toast.

By who and for what? What did the whistleblower do that would "toast" them? Told the truth?

The GOP side says that the WB was a Brennan "CIA plant" put in the WH to spy on Trump, part of the "insurance policy?". There are tons of photos of Ciaramella with democrats that make it pretty clear that he is a partisan hack. The fact that the original WB letter was all 2nd hand info proves that it was not a valid WB letter. Also, the WB law was intended for DNI level and below, not for the elected president. It was intended to prevent illegal operations like "Treadstone" or "Operation Crossfire Hurricane".

There are many versions of the "truth" about the Ukraine call, and none of them are impeachable.
 
Can’t get the whistle blower?
Go after the IG


There is no whistle blower, and the IG had no authority to take the complaint.

The law also required that the Complainant provide a complaint or information with respect to an “urgent concern,” which is defined, in relevant part, as: “A serious or flagrant problem, abuse, violation of the law or Executive order, or deficiency relating to the funding, administration, or operation of an intelligence activity within the responsibility and authority of the Director of National Intelligence involving classified information, but does not include differences of opinions concerning public policy matters.” Id. § 3033(k)(5)(G)(i). The Inspector General of the Intelligence Community determined that the Complainant alleged information with respect to such an alleged urgent concern.

https://www.dni.gov/files/ICIG/Documents/News/ICIG News/2019/September 30 - Statement on Processing of Whistleblower Complaints/ICIG Statement on Processing of Whistleblower Complaints.pdf

Now tell the class how a presidential diplomatic phone call is an intelligence activity that falls with in the authority and responsibility of the DNI.

.
 
Can’t get the whistle blower?
Go after the IG

They're both toast.

By who and for what? What did the whistleblower do that would "toast" them? Told the truth?

The GOP side says that the WB was a Brennan "CIA plant" put in the WH to spy on Trump, part of the "insurance policy?". There are tons of photos of Ciaramella with democrats that make it pretty clear that he is a partisan hack. The fact that the original WB letter was all 2nd hand info proves that it was not a valid WB letter. Also, the WB law was intended for DNI level and below, not for the elected president. It was intended to prevent illegal operations like "Treadstone" or "Operation Crossfire Hurricane".

There are many versions of the "truth" about the Ukraine call, and none of them are impeachable.

Oh..."some people say". Yeah, that's credible.

Here is a REALLY inconvenient truth for you...everything that the whistleblower "blew" on has been corroborated by public testimony.
 
Can’t get the whistle blower?
Go after the IG

They're both toast.

By who and for what? What did the whistleblower do that would "toast" them? Told the truth?

The GOP side says that the WB was a Brennan "CIA plant" put in the WH to spy on Trump, part of the "insurance policy?". There are tons of photos of Ciaramella with democrats that make it pretty clear that he is a partisan hack. The fact that the original WB letter was all 2nd hand info proves that it was not a valid WB letter. Also, the WB law was intended for DNI level and below, not for the elected president. It was intended to prevent illegal operations like "Treadstone" or "Operation Crossfire Hurricane".

There are many versions of the "truth" about the Ukraine call, and none of them are impeachable.

Oh..."some people say". Yeah, that's credible.

Here is a REALLY inconvenient truth for you...everything that the whistleblower "blew" on has been corroborated by public testimony.
:auiqs.jpg:
 
Can’t get the whistle blower?
Go after the IG

They're both toast.

By who and for what? What did the whistleblower do that would "toast" them? Told the truth?

The GOP side says that the WB was a Brennan "CIA plant" put in the WH to spy on Trump, part of the "insurance policy?". There are tons of photos of Ciaramella with democrats that make it pretty clear that he is a partisan hack. The fact that the original WB letter was all 2nd hand info proves that it was not a valid WB letter. Also, the WB law was intended for DNI level and below, not for the elected president. It was intended to prevent illegal operations like "Treadstone" or "Operation Crossfire Hurricane".

There are many versions of the "truth" about the Ukraine call, and none of them are impeachable.

Oh..."some people say". Yeah, that's credible.

Here is a REALLY inconvenient truth for you...everything that the whistleblower "blew" on has been corroborated by public testimony.

Not exactly true, I am not disputing the Zelensky call, Trump released the transcript.

However the "witnesses" at the Schiff show did not have direct knowledge of why Trump delayed the transfer of approved funds. Trump said "I want nothing". That was the only Trump statement was not 2nd, 3rd, or 20th hand.
In the senate only 1st hand evidence is admissible, so the impeachment is DOA. Trump has every right to delay a transfer if he suspects corruption, and last summer Poroshenko's guys were leaving, and Zelensky's were coming on. A delay to be sure was a good idea.
 
Can’t get the whistle blower?
Go after the IG

They're both toast.

By who and for what? What did the whistleblower do that would "toast" them? Told the truth?

The GOP side says that the WB was a Brennan "CIA plant" put in the WH to spy on Trump, part of the "insurance policy?". There are tons of photos of Ciaramella with democrats that make it pretty clear that he is a partisan hack. The fact that the original WB letter was all 2nd hand info proves that it was not a valid WB letter. Also, the WB law was intended for DNI level and below, not for the elected president. It was intended to prevent illegal operations like "Treadstone" or "Operation Crossfire Hurricane".

There are many versions of the "truth" about the Ukraine call, and none of them are impeachable.

Oh..."some people say". Yeah, that's credible.

Here is a REALLY inconvenient truth for you...everything that the whistleblower "blew" on has been corroborated by public testimony.


There was no legitimate whistle blower, are you blind? And no his BS wasn't corroborated by anyone.

.
 
Can’t get the whistle blower?
Go after the IG

They're both toast.

By who and for what? What did the whistleblower do that would "toast" them? Told the truth?

The GOP side says that the WB was a Brennan "CIA plant" put in the WH to spy on Trump, part of the "insurance policy?". There are tons of photos of Ciaramella with democrats that make it pretty clear that he is a partisan hack. The fact that the original WB letter was all 2nd hand info proves that it was not a valid WB letter. Also, the WB law was intended for DNI level and below, not for the elected president. It was intended to prevent illegal operations like "Treadstone" or "Operation Crossfire Hurricane".

There are many versions of the "truth" about the Ukraine call, and none of them are impeachable.

Oh..."some people say". Yeah, that's credible.

Here is a REALLY inconvenient truth for you...everything that the whistleblower "blew" on has been corroborated by public testimony.
He released the entire transcript of the call. There is nothing, but Trump getting reelected over this nonsense and we get a majority in both houses. To turn the supreme court conservative, is all I need. I really appreciate that!
 

Forum List

Back
Top