Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Impeachment witness David Holmes explains how he overheard Sondland call with Trump about UkraineCan’t get the whistle blower?
Go after the IG
They're both toast.
By who and for what? What did the whistleblower do that would "toast" them? Told the truth?
The GOP side says that the WB was a Brennan "CIA plant" put in the WH to spy on Trump, part of the "insurance policy?". There are tons of photos of Ciaramella with democrats that make it pretty clear that he is a partisan hack. The fact that the original WB letter was all 2nd hand info proves that it was not a valid WB letter. Also, the WB law was intended for DNI level and below, not for the elected president. It was intended to prevent illegal operations like "Treadstone" or "Operation Crossfire Hurricane".
There are many versions of the "truth" about the Ukraine call, and none of them are impeachable.
Oh..."some people say". Yeah, that's credible.
Here is a REALLY inconvenient truth for you...everything that the whistleblower "blew" on has been corroborated by public testimony.
Not exactly true, I am not disputing the Zelensky call, Trump released the transcript.
However the "witnesses" at the Schiff show did not have direct knowledge of why Trump delayed the transfer of approved funds. Trump said "I want nothing". That was the only Trump statement was not 2nd, 3rd, or 20th hand.
In the senate only 1st hand evidence is admissible, so the impeachment is DOA. Trump has every right to delay a transfer if he suspects corruption, and last summer Poroshenko's guys were leaving, and Zelensky's were coming on. A delay to be sure was a good idea.
Looks like harassment from the Trump administrationNunes.....Cue Grieg's "In the Hall of the Mountain King" for background music.
The intelligence community inspector general who already had been rebuked for his handling of the whistleblower complaint that triggered the Democrats' impeachment of President Trump is under investigation, according to Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif.
Nunes: Inspector general who started impeachment now under investigation - WND
Impeachment witness David Holmes explains how he overheard Sondland call with Trump about UkraineThey're both toast.
By who and for what? What did the whistleblower do that would "toast" them? Told the truth?
The GOP side says that the WB was a Brennan "CIA plant" put in the WH to spy on Trump, part of the "insurance policy?". There are tons of photos of Ciaramella with democrats that make it pretty clear that he is a partisan hack. The fact that the original WB letter was all 2nd hand info proves that it was not a valid WB letter. Also, the WB law was intended for DNI level and below, not for the elected president. It was intended to prevent illegal operations like "Treadstone" or "Operation Crossfire Hurricane".
There are many versions of the "truth" about the Ukraine call, and none of them are impeachable.
Oh..."some people say". Yeah, that's credible.
Here is a REALLY inconvenient truth for you...everything that the whistleblower "blew" on has been corroborated by public testimony.
Not exactly true, I am not disputing the Zelensky call, Trump released the transcript.
However the "witnesses" at the Schiff show did not have direct knowledge of why Trump delayed the transfer of approved funds. Trump said "I want nothing". That was the only Trump statement was not 2nd, 3rd, or 20th hand.
In the senate only 1st hand evidence is admissible, so the impeachment is DOA. Trump has every right to delay a transfer if he suspects corruption, and last summer Poroshenko's guys were leaving, and Zelensky's were coming on. A delay to be sure was a good idea.
Impeachment witness David Holmes explains how he overheard Sondland call with Trump about Ukraine
You should try opening your eyes.Impeachment witness David Holmes explains how he overheard Sondland call with Trump about UkraineBy who and for what? What did the whistleblower do that would "toast" them? Told the truth?
The GOP side says that the WB was a Brennan "CIA plant" put in the WH to spy on Trump, part of the "insurance policy?". There are tons of photos of Ciaramella with democrats that make it pretty clear that he is a partisan hack. The fact that the original WB letter was all 2nd hand info proves that it was not a valid WB letter. Also, the WB law was intended for DNI level and below, not for the elected president. It was intended to prevent illegal operations like "Treadstone" or "Operation Crossfire Hurricane".
There are many versions of the "truth" about the Ukraine call, and none of them are impeachable.
Oh..."some people say". Yeah, that's credible.
Here is a REALLY inconvenient truth for you...everything that the whistleblower "blew" on has been corroborated by public testimony.
Not exactly true, I am not disputing the Zelensky call, Trump released the transcript.
However the "witnesses" at the Schiff show did not have direct knowledge of why Trump delayed the transfer of approved funds. Trump said "I want nothing". That was the only Trump statement was not 2nd, 3rd, or 20th hand.
In the senate only 1st hand evidence is admissible, so the impeachment is DOA. Trump has every right to delay a transfer if he suspects corruption, and last summer Poroshenko's guys were leaving, and Zelensky's were coming on. A delay to be sure was a good idea.
Impeachment witness David Holmes explains how he overheard Sondland call with Trump about Ukraine
I'm not seeing anything remotely "illegal" or "impeachable" with that call.
Why do you think that eavesdropped phone conversation matters?
You should try opening your eyes.
where? In Iran?Can’t get the whistle blower?
Go after the IG
They're both toast.
By who and for what? What did the whistleblower do that would "toast" them? Told the truth?
The GOP side says that the WB was a Brennan "CIA plant" put in the WH to spy on Trump, part of the "insurance policy?". There are tons of photos of Ciaramella with democrats that make it pretty clear that he is a partisan hack. The fact that the original WB letter was all 2nd hand info proves that it was not a valid WB letter. Also, the WB law was intended for DNI level and below, not for the elected president. It was intended to prevent illegal operations like "Treadstone" or "Operation Crossfire Hurricane".
There are many versions of the "truth" about the Ukraine call, and none of them are impeachable.
Oh..."some people say". Yeah, that's credible.
Here is a REALLY inconvenient truth for you...everything that the whistleblower "blew" on has been corroborated by public testimony.
Can’t get the whistle blower?
Go after the IG
As much as Nunes is reliable (sarcasm) do we have another source?
Nunes has been proven right every single time.
As much as Nunes is reliable (sarcasm) do we have another source?
Can’t get the whistle blower?
Go after the IG
They're both toast.
By who and for what? What did the whistleblower do that would "toast" them? Told the truth?
The GOP side says that the WB was a Brennan "CIA plant" put in the WH to spy on Trump, part of the "insurance policy?". There are tons of photos of Ciaramella with democrats that make it pretty clear that he is a partisan hack. The fact that the original WB letter was all 2nd hand info proves that it was not a valid WB letter. Also, the WB law was intended for DNI level and below, not for the elected president. It was intended to prevent illegal operations like "Treadstone" or "Operation Crossfire Hurricane".
There are many versions of the "truth" about the Ukraine call, and none of them are impeachable.
Oh..."some people say". Yeah, that's credible.
Here is a REALLY inconvenient truth for you...everything that the whistleblower "blew" on has been corroborated by public testimony.
Cue Grieg's "In the Hall of the Mountain King" for background music.
The intelligence community inspector general who already had been rebuked for his handling of the whistleblower complaint that triggered the Democrats' impeachment of President Trump is under investigation, according to Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif.
Nunes: Inspector general who started impeachment now under investigation - WND
Impeachment witness David Holmes explains how he overheard Sondland call with Trump about UkraineThey're both toast.
By who and for what? What did the whistleblower do that would "toast" them? Told the truth?
The GOP side says that the WB was a Brennan "CIA plant" put in the WH to spy on Trump, part of the "insurance policy?". There are tons of photos of Ciaramella with democrats that make it pretty clear that he is a partisan hack. The fact that the original WB letter was all 2nd hand info proves that it was not a valid WB letter. Also, the WB law was intended for DNI level and below, not for the elected president. It was intended to prevent illegal operations like "Treadstone" or "Operation Crossfire Hurricane".
There are many versions of the "truth" about the Ukraine call, and none of them are impeachable.
Oh..."some people say". Yeah, that's credible.
Here is a REALLY inconvenient truth for you...everything that the whistleblower "blew" on has been corroborated by public testimony.
Not exactly true, I am not disputing the Zelensky call, Trump released the transcript.
However the "witnesses" at the Schiff show did not have direct knowledge of why Trump delayed the transfer of approved funds. Trump said "I want nothing". That was the only Trump statement was not 2nd, 3rd, or 20th hand.
In the senate only 1st hand evidence is admissible, so the impeachment is DOA. Trump has every right to delay a transfer if he suspects corruption, and last summer Poroshenko's guys were leaving, and Zelensky's were coming on. A delay to be sure was a good idea.
Impeachment witness David Holmes explains how he overheard Sondland call with Trump about Ukraine
Nunes has been proven right every single time.
As much as Nunes is reliable (sarcasm) do we have another source?
Like when he didn't live up to his responsibility as a member of Congress to be a check on the executive branch and ran to them like a little girl?
It was his duty to report Treason.
Schiff has been proven a liar every time, and Nunes has been vindicated.
Nunes has been proven right every single time.
As much as Nunes is reliable (sarcasm) do we have another source?
Like when he didn't live up to his responsibility as a member of Congress to be a check on the executive branch and ran to them like a little girl?
Nunes has been proven right every single time.
As much as Nunes is reliable (sarcasm) do we have another source?
Like when he didn't live up to his responsibility as a member of Congress to be a check on the executive branch and ran to them like a little girl?
It was his duty to report Treason.
Schiff has been proven a liar every time, and Nunes has been vindicated.
Nunes has been proven right every single time.
As much as Nunes is reliable (sarcasm) do we have another source?
Like when he didn't live up to his responsibility as a member of Congress to be a check on the executive branch and ran to them like a little girl?
Poor bastard, doesn't even know what treason is.
Impeachment witness David Holmes explains how he overheard Sondland call with Trump about UkraineThey're both toast.
By who and for what? What did the whistleblower do that would "toast" them? Told the truth?
The GOP side says that the WB was a Brennan "CIA plant" put in the WH to spy on Trump, part of the "insurance policy?". There are tons of photos of Ciaramella with democrats that make it pretty clear that he is a partisan hack. The fact that the original WB letter was all 2nd hand info proves that it was not a valid WB letter. Also, the WB law was intended for DNI level and below, not for the elected president. It was intended to prevent illegal operations like "Treadstone" or "Operation Crossfire Hurricane".
There are many versions of the "truth" about the Ukraine call, and none of them are impeachable.
Oh..."some people say". Yeah, that's credible.
Here is a REALLY inconvenient truth for you...everything that the whistleblower "blew" on has been corroborated by public testimony.
Not exactly true, I am not disputing the Zelensky call, Trump released the transcript.
However the "witnesses" at the Schiff show did not have direct knowledge of why Trump delayed the transfer of approved funds. Trump said "I want nothing". That was the only Trump statement was not 2nd, 3rd, or 20th hand.
In the senate only 1st hand evidence is admissible, so the impeachment is DOA. Trump has every right to delay a transfer if he suspects corruption, and last summer Poroshenko's guys were leaving, and Zelensky's were coming on. A delay to be sure was a good idea.
Impeachment witness David Holmes explains how he overheard Sondland call with Trump about Ukraine
Oh but you do, Right Benedict Arnold?
It was his duty to report Treason.
Schiff has been proven a liar every time, and Nunes has been vindicated.
Nunes has been proven right every single time.
As much as Nunes is reliable (sarcasm) do we have another source?
Like when he didn't live up to his responsibility as a member of Congress to be a check on the executive branch and ran to them like a little girl?
Poor bastard, doesn't even know what treason is.
Cue Grieg's "In the Hall of the Mountain King" for background music.
The intelligence community inspector general who already had been rebuked for his handling of the whistleblower complaint that triggered the Democrats' impeachment of President Trump is under investigation, according to Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif.
Nunes: Inspector general who started impeachment now under investigation - WND
Can’t get the whistle blower?
Go after the IG
There is no whistle blower, and the IG had no authority to take the complaint.
The law also required that the Complainant provide a complaint or information with respect to an “urgent concern,” which is defined, in relevant part, as: “A serious or flagrant problem, abuse, violation of the law or Executive order, or deficiency relating to the funding, administration, or operation of an intelligence activity within the responsibility and authority of the Director of National Intelligence involving classified information, but does not include differences of opinions concerning public policy matters.” Id. § 3033(k)(5)(G)(i). The Inspector General of the Intelligence Community determined that the Complainant alleged information with respect to such an alleged urgent concern.
https://www.dni.gov/files/ICIG/Documents/News/ICIG News/2019/September 30 - Statement on Processing of Whistleblower Complaints/ICIG Statement on Processing of Whistleblower Complaints.pdf
Now tell the class how a presidential diplomatic phone call is an intelligence activity that falls with in the authority and responsibility of the DNI.
.
