Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I pointed out how incorrect you were, at which point you changed subject, running away from your little analogy like a terrified little bitch.
Your claim that everyone thought the president had immunity is unsupported bullshit. It wasn't taken seriously because we all sort of agreed that the president needs to be accountable. Remember how we are supposed to be a country of laws, not a country of men. Not any more thanks to you pathetic losers who have inflicted this disgusting human being on the country.
You don't remember the "lock her up" chants?
The Trump opinion acknowledged these truths and built on Nixon v. Fitzgerald (1982), which recognized presidential immunity from civil lawsuits predicated on official acts. In that case, Justice Lewis Powell wrote that such immunity is mandated by the president’s “unique position” and “rooted in the constitutional tradition of the separation of powers.” Lawsuits “could distract a President from his public duties, to the detriment of not only the President and his office but also the Nation that the Presidency was designed to serve.”
Again, you're confusing civil and criminal liability and pretending like they're the same.You didn't point out shit, you just regurgitated your same bullshit points.
Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731 (1982)
https://www.wsj.com/articles/americ...es-c163ae81?mod=opinion_feat2_commentary_pos1
