Iowa Reaches Milestone on Wind-Energy Production - 64%

[abu afak]

Tell us how much was spent

Lying AGAIN moron.
I did not say Turbines were cheap, I said they and the power they produced was cheaper than Fossil Fuels, and ergo the Boom. (IA 64%, SD, 56%, OK 45%, TX 31%, etc.)
And I have two thread starts Documenting that fact still near the top of the section. (One citing the IEA).
And there is the FACT of the BOOM and mainly in Red States in Wind.

You and your freaky questions/Demand Endless Detail Fallacy lose again!!
`

 

[elektra]

You and your freaky questions/Demand Endless Detail Fallacy lose again!!

Abu, you made the claim that renewables are cheaper. I asked how much do they cost.

How much did we spend on wind turbines is called a, "freaky question" by our expert on the cost of wind turbines.

 

[abu afak]

Abu, you made the claim that renewables are cheaper. I asked how much do they cost.

How much did we spend on wind turbines is called a, "freaky question" by our expert on the cost of wind turbines.

I made the the statement (many times here and in at least 3 OPs) that renewable energy (plants) are now cheaper than fossil fuels, roughly starting in 2020. (after a decade of 85-90% improvment in efficiency and ergo cost per KWH.)
I Never made a statement what a single Turbine cost, nor does it matter to the success of the tech.
It IS "Freak"/Irrelevant/stupid.

It's clear the tech works and is booming because of it.
YOU LOST the true game. (and you didn't answer my posts at all.
Nor justify your Buffett Conspiracy/Lie.

Each Turbine is probably more expensive and bigger now as it is more cost-effective (again per KWH) larger.
So the cost per Turbine is academic, and efficiency is key. They may be two times more expensive but produce 3x the power. It also may depend on setting to decide size/cost.

You are either low IQ and think you can pull stupid semantics on others but you are not nearly smart enough to play with me. Or maybe you're just stupid and think all turbines are the same size and/or efficiency and/or price since Year 2000. Idiotic.

And the above just one example of your dishonest 20-questions style of piling up [again] endless irrelevant detail that no one could answer.
It matters NOT "what we spent since Y2K/over time" (WTF!), it matters what it cost recently and now/should we invest.
``

 

[elektra]

It matters NOT "what we spent since Y2K/over time, it matters what it cost recently and now/should we invest.

Abu says it does not matter what we spent
Abu claims solar and wind are cheap

Okay, how much, will this cost.

Abu wont tell us how much was spent and abu certainly wont tell us how much more we have to spend

How much more needs to be spent abu

 

[abu afak]

Abu says it does not matter what we spent
Abu claims solar and wind are cheap

Okay, how much, will this cost.

Abu wont tell us how much was spent and abu certainly wont tell us how much more we have to spend

How much more needs to be spent abu

Not a honest response. Impossible for the Dishonest/low IQ Elektra.
What is "this?"

I said and Backed with credible links, and of course the reality of Wind's booming success, it's cheaper than Fossil Fuels.

So the question/cost relative to FFs may in fact be, ""how much will we SAVE.""

Again, you are not smart enough to play with me.

`

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I made the the statement (many times here and in at least 3 OPs) that renewable energy (plants) are now cheaper than fossil fuels, roughly starting in 2020. (after a decade of 85-90% improvment in efficiency and ergo cost per KWH.)
I Never made a statement what a single Turbine cost, nor does it matter to the success of the tech.
It IS "Freak"/Irrelevant/stupid.

It's clear the tech works and is booming because of it.
YOU LOST the true game. (and you didn't answer my posts at all.
Nor justify your Buffett Conspiracy/Lie.

Each Turbine is probably more expensive and bigger now as it is more cost-effective (again per KWH) larger.
So the cost per Turbine is academic, and efficiency is key. They may be two times more expensive but produce 3x the power. It also may depend on setting to decide size/cost.

You are either low IQ and think you can pull stupid semantics on others but you are not nearly smart enough to play with me. Or maybe you're just stupid and think all turbines are the same size and/or efficiency and/or price since Year 2000. Idiotic.

And the above just one example of your dishonest 20-questions style of piling up [again] endless irrelevant detail that no one could answer.
It matters NOT "what we spent since Y2K/over time" (WTF!), it matters what it cost recently and now/should we invest.
``

I made the the statement (many times here and in at least 3 OPs) that renewable energy (plants) are now cheaper than fossil fuels,

LOL!