Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We are going to end up with a country full of Centralia, Pa's.
Alarmist much?
Please tell me you understand the difference between mining a coal seam, and fracturing rock and sucking out the natural gas that results from it.....
Doesn't change the fact you could end up with an underground fire.
I'm not gonna watch an hour long video just to see propaganda. I'll assume it's an anti-fracking flick.We are going to end up with a country full of Centralia, Pa's.
So blame your hero hack president's reimposition of offshore drilling restrictions on the fracking problem you allege. If fracking is a problem for you, blame yourself.
No, it's a story about a mining town where the mine under the city caught fire and has been burning for over 40 years and has basically forced everyone out of the city... and how it has created an environmental nightmare.
Doesn't change the fact that it is not an apt comparison.
No, natural gas pockets can catch fire and burn continuously as well.
Door to Hell - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
We are going to end up with a country full of Centralia, Pa's.
Alarmist much?
Please tell me you understand the difference between mining a coal seam, and fracturing rock and sucking out the natural gas that results from it.....
Doesn't change the fact you could end up with an underground fire.
I'm not gonna watch an hour long video just to see propaganda. I'll assume it's an anti-fracking flick.We are going to end up with a country full of Centralia, Pa's.
So blame your hero hack president's reimposition of offshore drilling restrictions on the fracking problem you allege. If fracking is a problem for you, blame yourself.
No, it's a story about a mining town where the mine under the city caught fire and has been burning for over 40 years and has basically forced everyone out of the city... and how it has created an environmental nightmare.
Doesn't change the fact that it is not an apt comparison.
No, natural gas pockets can catch fire and burn continuously as well.
Door to Hell - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
yeah, that was intentionally lit, and is a surface burn. You found "one". congrats.
But you blamed it on mining. You need to be more specific lest you appear hypocritical. If there is one mine you object to then that's one thing. But your premise is more comprehensive. And political.You're the one who bitched about mining without considering the benefits you enjoy.Aren't you railing against mining?So you must give up all of the conveniences you use or else you're a hypocrite.
See how many people can actually read your internet grievances when you have to write them on stone tablets.
You are creating a strawman argument. I never said such a thing.
There is a difference in railing against mining, and taking a stance on process that is not well studied and that involves destabilizing the ground beneath us. Not to mention the hazardous waste water it produces that many times has been found to contaminate drinking water. So what good it that i-pad you have, if you are dead from drinking poisonous water? I know there is a place in this world for oil, gas, and coal. You can't make steel and several other essential materials without coal, BUT there are several other things we use on a daily basis that we use these types of fuels for, that we can find alternative sources for. Which in turn dramatically decreases the need to have so many mines, drilling, and fracking sites running simultaneously.
So you jumped the shark on my opinion, and created a strawman argument.
No, I did not. I just mentioned one of the bad results of mining. You have brought absolutely no substance to this argument other than, "hey yo, do you want to you rocks to scratch out messages?"
Yeah....because we all know methane doesnt seep out of the bottom of lakes and rivers.
Yeah but Methane isnt water dumbass LMAO
Yeah....because we all know methane doesnt seep out of the bottom of lakes and rivers.
Yeah but Methane isnt water dumbass LMAO
You dumbass.
Methane is a gas that floats to the surface and will burn.
What a tard.
That doesnt seem to be right? Water fights fire normally.
Yeah....because we all know methane doesnt seep out of the bottom of lakes and rivers.
Yeah but Methane isnt water dumbass LMAO
You dumbass.
Methane is a gas that floats to the surface and will burn.
What a tard.
I know...thats why those guys arent burning WATER like in my clip. They are burning GAS or to put it more plainly. That isnt water.
But you blamed it on mining. You need to be more specific lest you appear hypocritical. If there is one mine you object to then that's one thing. But your premise is more comprehensive. And political.You're the one who bitched about mining without considering the benefits you enjoy.Aren't you railing against mining?You are creating a strawman argument. I never said such a thing.
There is a difference in railing against mining, and taking a stance on process that is not well studied and that involves destabilizing the ground beneath us. Not to mention the hazardous waste water it produces that many times has been found to contaminate drinking water. So what good it that i-pad you have, if you are dead from drinking poisonous water? I know there is a place in this world for oil, gas, and coal. You can't make steel and several other essential materials without coal, BUT there are several other things we use on a daily basis that we use these types of fuels for, that we can find alternative sources for. Which in turn dramatically decreases the need to have so many mines, drilling, and fracking sites running simultaneously.
So you jumped the shark on my opinion, and created a strawman argument.
No, I did not. I just mentioned one of the bad results of mining. You have brought absolutely no substance to this argument other than, "hey yo, do you want to you rocks to scratch out messages?"
Yeah....because we all know methane doesnt seep out of the bottom of lakes and rivers.
Yeah but Methane isnt water dumbass LMAO
You dumbass.
Methane is a gas that floats to the surface and will burn.
What a tard.
I know...thats why those guys arent burning WATER like in my clip. They are burning GAS or to put it more plainly. That isnt water.
How do you know it's not methane?
Does anyone actually know the cause of the fire?
Wasn't that an issue with regards to those faucets that flamed? It was blamed on fracking, but it turned out it was due to shallow surface biological decay products, and not fracking gas.
It very well could be methane but there is a difference between natural methane and methane being pushed into the water with Fracking Techniques.
It very well could be methane but there is a difference between natural methane and methane being pushed into the water with Fracking Techniques.
Fracking is done well below any known water table....it's all leftist bullshit.
Then how is that shit getting in the water then?
Then how is that shit getting in the water then?
There was a chemical spill into Lake Huron from Ontario the other day.....just because there's more EPA laws on the books doesn't mean things of that nature don't still happen. Obviously water doesn't burn....it was a floating solvent that caught....better to light it off than let it sink into the riverbed.
Tell that to people who die without the resources we currently utilize and rely on.But you blamed it on mining. You need to be more specific lest you appear hypocritical. If there is one mine you object to then that's one thing. But your premise is more comprehensive. And political.You're the one who bitched about mining without considering the benefits you enjoy.Aren't you railing against mining?
There is a difference in railing against mining, and taking a stance on process that is not well studied and that involves destabilizing the ground beneath us. Not to mention the hazardous waste water it produces that many times has been found to contaminate drinking water. So what good it that i-pad you have, if you are dead from drinking poisonous water? I know there is a place in this world for oil, gas, and coal. You can't make steel and several other essential materials without coal, BUT there are several other things we use on a daily basis that we use these types of fuels for, that we can find alternative sources for. Which in turn dramatically decreases the need to have so many mines, drilling, and fracking sites running simultaneously.
So you jumped the shark on my opinion, and created a strawman argument.
No, I did not. I just mentioned one of the bad results of mining. You have brought absolutely no substance to this argument other than, "hey yo, do you want to you rocks to scratch out messages?"
No it isn't political, it's rational. There is not one educated person on this planet, that will argue that mining doesn't have a negative effect on the environment. Instead, they will do like you did, and argue that if not for mining we wouldn't be able to live the lives we have. Well I have absolutely no problem with that, BUT my argument, as is the argument of many other people, is to limit the need for coal, oil, and natural gas. There is no reason to rely so heavily on it, and have so many irons in the fire so to speak. It takes tens of thousands of years for the environment to fix the damage we do to it, so why is it so difficult to get behind the idea of limiting the amount of damage we do during a certain period of time?
You continue to try to build something out of what I'm saying, that I haven't said...obviously I'm wasting my time discussing this with you.
Tell that to people who die without the resources we currently utilize and rely on.But you blamed it on mining. You need to be more specific lest you appear hypocritical. If there is one mine you object to then that's one thing. But your premise is more comprehensive. And political.You're the one who bitched about mining without considering the benefits you enjoy.There is a difference in railing against mining, and taking a stance on process that is not well studied and that involves destabilizing the ground beneath us. Not to mention the hazardous waste water it produces that many times has been found to contaminate drinking water. So what good it that i-pad you have, if you are dead from drinking poisonous water? I know there is a place in this world for oil, gas, and coal. You can't make steel and several other essential materials without coal, BUT there are several other things we use on a daily basis that we use these types of fuels for, that we can find alternative sources for. Which in turn dramatically decreases the need to have so many mines, drilling, and fracking sites running simultaneously.
So you jumped the shark on my opinion, and created a strawman argument.
No, I did not. I just mentioned one of the bad results of mining. You have brought absolutely no substance to this argument other than, "hey yo, do you want to you rocks to scratch out messages?"
No it isn't political, it's rational. There is not one educated person on this planet, that will argue that mining doesn't have a negative effect on the environment. Instead, they will do like you did, and argue that if not for mining we wouldn't be able to live the lives we have. Well I have absolutely no problem with that, BUT my argument, as is the argument of many other people, is to limit the need for coal, oil, and natural gas. There is no reason to rely so heavily on it, and have so many irons in the fire so to speak. It takes tens of thousands of years for the environment to fix the damage we do to it, so why is it so difficult to get behind the idea of limiting the amount of damage we do during a certain period of time?
You continue to try to build something out of what I'm saying, that I haven't said...obviously I'm wasting my time discussing this with you.
Once an alternative becomes practical then go for it. Until then, it is reckless to pretend an alternative already exists.
You conveniently overlook the term practical.Tell that to people who die without the resources we currently utilize and rely on.But you blamed it on mining. You need to be more specific lest you appear hypocritical. If there is one mine you object to then that's one thing. But your premise is more comprehensive. And political.You're the one who bitched about mining without considering the benefits you enjoy.
No, I did not. I just mentioned one of the bad results of mining. You have brought absolutely no substance to this argument other than, "hey yo, do you want to you rocks to scratch out messages?"
No it isn't political, it's rational. There is not one educated person on this planet, that will argue that mining doesn't have a negative effect on the environment. Instead, they will do like you did, and argue that if not for mining we wouldn't be able to live the lives we have. Well I have absolutely no problem with that, BUT my argument, as is the argument of many other people, is to limit the need for coal, oil, and natural gas. There is no reason to rely so heavily on it, and have so many irons in the fire so to speak. It takes tens of thousands of years for the environment to fix the damage we do to it, so why is it so difficult to get behind the idea of limiting the amount of damage we do during a certain period of time?
You continue to try to build something out of what I'm saying, that I haven't said...obviously I'm wasting my time discussing this with you.
Once an alternative becomes practical then go for it. Until then, it is reckless to pretend an alternative already exists.
Have you been living under a rock? There are numerous alternative resources. The one I like best is the one where they grow algae to use as a source.
Arup unveils world's first algae-powered building
That doesnt seem to be right? Water fights fire normally.
