Is There Any Racism In The United States?

[LOIE]

"Donald Trump falsely declared in a weekend rally that public health authorities are denying the COVID-19 vaccine to white people because of their race."


Under Democrast NY Governor: "White people told not to bother trying to get monoclonal ...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk › news › article-10359065
White people in NY are told not to attempt to get monoclonal antibody treatment from doctors because Gov. Hochul has prioritized it for non- ...



Can you really be this dumb???




BTW....did you know that the Nazis actually said that they learned from the Democrat Party?

• First, the Nazis copied the Progressives/Democrats Immigration Policies.
• Only the ‘right races’ welcomed.
  
  “Progressives opposed immigration and enacted several immigration restrictions during the 1920s. Progressives also tried to force immigrants to adopt Progressive moral beliefs.” Progressive Movement - Ohio History Central
  
  And… Immigrant Restrictions During the Progressive Era | Synonym
  
  Hitler lauded the Progressives’ immigration policies.
  
  “By refusing immigration on principle to elements in poor health, by simply excluding certain racesfrom naturalization, it professes in slow beginnings a view which is peculiar to the folkish state concept.”
  “Mein Kampf,” chapter three
• 
  
• 
  
• “Hitler also appealed to the racially exclusionary provisions of U.S. immigration laws, specifically the 1924 Immigration Act that had been pushed by American progressives as a model of enlightened eugenic legislation. “There is today one state,” Hitler noted, “in which at least weak beginning toward a better conception are noticeable. Of course it is not our German Republic but the American union. By refusing immigration on principle to elements in poor health, by simply excluding certain races from naturalization, it professes in slow beginnings a view which is peculiar to the Volkish state concept.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats
  
  How about Franklin Roosevelt's attitude toward other races....?
  "This attitude dovetails with what is known about FDR's views regarding immigrants in general and Asian immigrants in particular.... He recommended that future immigration should be limited to those who had "blood of the right sort." FDR's troubling view of Jews
  
  Sieg Heil, Franklin????
  
  
• 
  
• Know what else the Nazis learned from the Progressives/Democrats?
  
  “…history of laws against miscegenation—interracial marriage or procreation—in the United States.
  
  Under the influence of Darwinism, racial science and an associated eugenics movement emerged in the late nineteenth century, grew with the Progressive movement, peaked in the 1920s, and disappeared during World War II. (Its enthusiastic embrace by Hitler did not help it…” The Race Against Race
  
  “The Germanic inhabitant of the American continent, who has remained racially pure and unmixed, rose to be master of the continent; he will remain the master as long as he does not fall a victim to defilement of the blood.”
  Adolph Hitler
  Untitled Document
  
  
• “At Nuremberg, the Nazis sought to preserve Nordic racial purity by outlawing racial intermarriage with Jews in much the same manner that Democratic anti-miscegenation laws outlawed racial intermarriage with blacks.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats
  
  
  
  3. Guess were Adolph got the idea for sterilization of ‘undesireables’???

“…Hitler learned from progressive sterilization laws that had been enacted in America through the influence of activists like Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood. “I have studied with great interest the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would in all probability be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock.”

Hitler’s views—which closely parallel Sanger’s—provided the basis for the Nazi sterilization laws of 1933 which began by targeting “imbeciles” and the mentally retarded, and later expanded to cover Jews, gypsies, and other social undesirables.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats

• 
  
  
  Hitler wrote to the president of the American Eugenics Society to ask for a copy of his “The Case for Sterilization.”
  (Margaret Sanger and Sterilization)
  
  German race science stood on American progressive’s shoulders.
• 
  
• The Nazi Nuremberg Laws were taken nearly wholly from the Jim Crow Laws of the Democrat controlled South.
  
  In “Hitler's American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law ,” by James Whitman, he shows how the Nazis took the Democrats’ Jim Crow Laws, simply changed the word ‘black’ and inserted the word ‘Jew.’

“Let’s remember that every segregation law in the South was passed by a Democratic legislature, signed by a Democratic governor, and enforced by Democratic officials. The Nuremberg team carefully studied these laws that were mainly aimed at blacks and used them to formulate their own racist legislation mainly aimed at Jews.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats




See all the efforts I've saved you?


Say thank you.

Yeah, Right. I honestly do not look at Breitbart or any of the other places you go for your info. This stuff here looks like they're talking about many, many years ago. The Democrats of the south with the Jim Crow laws and all that stuff, is not the Democratic party of today. Just read an article titled "How the Party of Lincoln won over the once Democratic South" on History.com. The History channel on TV and on the web is just that - history - with no political slant or persuasion. Great place to go for facts.

Does the party who gave us our first Black president and first Black female vice-president really adhere to all this nonsense?

 

[IM2]

Yeah, Right. I honestly do not look at Breitbart or any of the other places you go for your info. This stuff here looks like they're talking about many, many years ago. The Democrats of the south with the Jim Crow laws and all that stuff, is not the Democratic party of today. Just read an article titled "How the Party of Lincoln won over the once Democratic South" on History.com. The History channel on TV and on the web is just that - history - with no political slant or persuasion. Great place to go for facts.

Does the party who gave us our first Black president and first Black female vice-president really adhere to all this nonsense?

No. But she repeats the right-wing crap and actually believes she's making a point. Blacks were republicans for 100 years and we left for valid reasons. But this dumb cow would rather repeat the lie of democrats giving blacks free stuff than to face the truth that we left the republican party because they fucked us over for 100 years.

 

[IM2]

"Donald Trump falsely declared in a weekend rally that public health authorities are denying the COVID-19 vaccine to white people because of their race."


Under Democrast NY Governor: "White people told not to bother trying to get monoclonal ...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk › news › article-10359065
White people in NY are told not to attempt to get monoclonal antibody treatment from doctors because Gov. Hochul has prioritized it for non- ...



Can you really be this dumb???




BTW....did you know that the Nazis actually said that they learned from the Democrat Party?

• First, the Nazis copied the Progressives/Democrats Immigration Policies.
• Only the ‘right races’ welcomed.
  
  “Progressives opposed immigration and enacted several immigration restrictions during the 1920s. Progressives also tried to force immigrants to adopt Progressive moral beliefs.” Progressive Movement - Ohio History Central
  
  And… Immigrant Restrictions During the Progressive Era | Synonym
  
  Hitler lauded the Progressives’ immigration policies.
  
  “By refusing immigration on principle to elements in poor health, by simply excluding certain racesfrom naturalization, it professes in slow beginnings a view which is peculiar to the folkish state concept.”
  “Mein Kampf,” chapter three
• 
  
• 
  
• “Hitler also appealed to the racially exclusionary provisions of U.S. immigration laws, specifically the 1924 Immigration Act that had been pushed by American progressives as a model of enlightened eugenic legislation. “There is today one state,” Hitler noted, “in which at least weak beginning toward a better conception are noticeable. Of course it is not our German Republic but the American union. By refusing immigration on principle to elements in poor health, by simply excluding certain races from naturalization, it professes in slow beginnings a view which is peculiar to the Volkish state concept.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats
  
  How about Franklin Roosevelt's attitude toward other races....?
  "This attitude dovetails with what is known about FDR's views regarding immigrants in general and Asian immigrants in particular.... He recommended that future immigration should be limited to those who had "blood of the right sort." FDR's troubling view of Jews
  
  Sieg Heil, Franklin????
  
  
• 
  
• Know what else the Nazis learned from the Progressives/Democrats?
  
  “…history of laws against miscegenation—interracial marriage or procreation—in the United States.
  
  Under the influence of Darwinism, racial science and an associated eugenics movement emerged in the late nineteenth century, grew with the Progressive movement, peaked in the 1920s, and disappeared during World War II. (Its enthusiastic embrace by Hitler did not help it…” The Race Against Race
  
  “The Germanic inhabitant of the American continent, who has remained racially pure and unmixed, rose to be master of the continent; he will remain the master as long as he does not fall a victim to defilement of the blood.”
  Adolph Hitler
  Untitled Document
  
  
• “At Nuremberg, the Nazis sought to preserve Nordic racial purity by outlawing racial intermarriage with Jews in much the same manner that Democratic anti-miscegenation laws outlawed racial intermarriage with blacks.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats
  
  
  
  3. Guess were Adolph got the idea for sterilization of ‘undesireables’???

“…Hitler learned from progressive sterilization laws that had been enacted in America through the influence of activists like Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood. “I have studied with great interest the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would in all probability be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock.”

Hitler’s views—which closely parallel Sanger’s—provided the basis for the Nazi sterilization laws of 1933 which began by targeting “imbeciles” and the mentally retarded, and later expanded to cover Jews, gypsies, and other social undesirables.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats

• 
  
  
  Hitler wrote to the president of the American Eugenics Society to ask for a copy of his “The Case for Sterilization.”
  (Margaret Sanger and Sterilization)
  
  German race science stood on American progressive’s shoulders.
• 
  
• The Nazi Nuremberg Laws were taken nearly wholly from the Jim Crow Laws of the Democrat controlled South.
  
  In “Hitler's American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law ,” by James Whitman, he shows how the Nazis took the Democrats’ Jim Crow Laws, simply changed the word ‘black’ and inserted the word ‘Jew.’

“Let’s remember that every segregation law in the South was passed by a Democratic legislature, signed by a Democratic governor, and enforced by Democratic officials. The Nuremberg team carefully studied these laws that were mainly aimed at blacks and used them to formulate their own racist legislation mainly aimed at Jews.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats




See all the efforts I've saved you?


Say thank you.

You are a stupid ass ho.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yeah, Right. I honestly do not look at Breitbart or any of the other places you go for your info. This stuff here looks like they're talking about many, many years ago. The Democrats of the south with the Jim Crow laws and all that stuff, is not the Democratic party of today. Just read an article titled "How the Party of Lincoln won over the once Democratic South" on History.com. The History channel on TV and on the web is just that - history - with no political slant or persuasion. Great place to go for facts.

Does the party who gave us our first Black president and first Black female vice-president really adhere to all this nonsense?

You're a brain-washed moron, but that's exactly what you party prizes.

The same lack of thinking took place in Germany in the 30s and 40s, and you are what gives these Nazis power.


How do you feel knowing that the majority of your party is no different from your predecessors:

“Poll: Democrat Voters Want to Punish Unvaccinated

• 59% of Democrats support the government forcing confinement for unvaccinated Americans in their homes.
• 78% of Democrats support Joe Biden’s shot mandate for businesses with more than 100 employees.
• 55% of Democrats support fines for Americans who refuse the shots.
• 48% of Democrats say the government should fine or imprison Americans who question the efficacy of COVID shots on social media, on radio/TV or in publications.
• 47% of Democrats support government tracking to ensure quarantines or social distancing.
• 29% of Democrats say parents should lose custody of their children if they refuse the COVID vaccine.”

https://www.lc.org › full-article › 0118poll-democrat-voters-want-to-punish-unvaccinated




Your party is the one that had concentration camps for American citizens.....and, as this poll shows, the same thinking applies today.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You are a stupid ass ho.

You believed you were speaking to your mom?????

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yeah, Right. I honestly do not look at Breitbart or any of the other places you go for your info. This stuff here looks like they're talking about many, many years ago. The Democrats of the south with the Jim Crow laws and all that stuff, is not the Democratic party of today. Just read an article titled "How the Party of Lincoln won over the once Democratic South" on History.com. The History channel on TV and on the web is just that - history - with no political slant or persuasion. Great place to go for facts.

Does the party who gave us our first Black president and first Black female vice-president really adhere to all this nonsense?

"This stuff here looks like they're talking about many, many years ago."


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,

socialism,

infanticide,

opposition to free speech,

standing with criminals and felons rather than law-abiding citizens

substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,

support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,

accepting payment from Communist China for future considerations,

and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.





Now......which is your favorite?

 

[PoliticalChic]

You're a brain-washed moron, but that's exactly what you party prizes.

The same lack of thinking took place in Germany in the 30s and 40s, and you are what gives these Nazis power.


How do you feel knowing that the majority of your party is no different from your predecessors:

“Poll: Democrat Voters Want to Punish Unvaccinated

• 59% of Democrats support the government forcing confinement for unvaccinated Americans in their homes.
• 78% of Democrats support Joe Biden’s shot mandate for businesses with more than 100 employees.
• 55% of Democrats support fines for Americans who refuse the shots.
• 48% of Democrats say the government should fine or imprison Americans who question the efficacy of COVID shots on social media, on radio/TV or in publications.
• 47% of Democrats support government tracking to ensure quarantines or social distancing.
• 29% of Democrats say parents should lose custody of their children if they refuse the COVID vaccine.”

https://www.lc.org › full-article › 0118poll-democrat-voters-want-to-punish-unvaccinated




Your party is the one that had concentration camps for American citizens.....and, as this poll shows, the same thinking applies today.

"Does the party who gave us our first Black president and first Black female vice-president really adhere to all this nonsense?"


You're too dumb to realize you just proved what I said.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yeah, Right. I honestly do not look at Breitbart or any of the other places you go for your info. This stuff here looks like they're talking about many, many years ago. The Democrats of the south with the Jim Crow laws and all that stuff, is not the Democratic party of today. Just read an article titled "How the Party of Lincoln won over the once Democratic South" on History.com. The History channel on TV and on the web is just that - history - with no political slant or persuasion. Great place to go for facts.

Does the party who gave us our first Black president and first Black female vice-president really adhere to all this nonsense?

"Yeah, Right. I honestly do not look at Breitbart or any of the other places you go for your info."


Let's check:


COVID-19 Vaccine Equity for Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups

https://www.cdc.gov › community › health-equity › va...
Because of these and other challenges, some Black or African American people and Hispanic or Latino people are less likely to be vaccinated against COVID-19 ...


Is It Lawful and Ethical to Prioritize Racial Minorities for COVID ...

https://jamanetwork.com › journals › jama › fullarticle
by H Schmidt · 2020 · Cited by 49 — Both NASEM and WHO urge policy makers to allocate vaccines in ways that reduce unjust health disparities. The ethics and legality of race-based ...


Prioritizing Equity in COVID-19 Vaccinations - Margolis Center ...

https://healthpolicy.duke.edu › publications › prioritizin...
Mar 31, 2021 — Systemic inequities underpin disparities in COVID-19 risk and disease burden among historically marginalized populations across the United ...


Stark Racial Disparities Persist in Vaccinations, State-Level ...

https://khn.org › news › article › covid-vaccination-star...
May 20, 2021 — Black Americans' vaccination rates still trail all other groups, while Hispanics show improvement. Native Americans show the strongest rates ...


Stark racial disparities persist in vaccinations, state-level CDC ...

https://www.cnn.com › 2021/05/20 › health › racial-dispa...
May 20, 2021 — Black Americans' Covid-19 vaccination rates are still lagging months into the nation's campaign, while Hispanics are closing the gap and ...


Covid-19 is devastating communities of color. Can vaccines ...

https://www.washingtonpost.com › health › 2020/12/18
Dec 18, 2020 — Can vaccines counter racial inequity? As states wrestle with whether to prioritize essential workers or the elderly, Tennessee is setting aside ...


How should people of color get priority for a Covid-19 vaccine?

https://www.statnews.com › 2020/11/09 › health-expert...
Nov 9, 2020 — Public health experts support giving preference for a Covid-19 vaccine to communities that have experienced high rates of illness.




Remember the last time you were right about anything????


Me neither.

 

[LOIE]

That's because you are an indoctrinated moron.

The links are exactly the way to prove you know less than nothing.

Find any and show it to be false.


Ask me to show that the DNC house organs, the NYTimes, the LATimes, simply lie for the party.....you know, like you.

There is a program called "One Small Step" where the get Americans from across the political spectrum to stop demonizing one another and start communicating - face to face, one conversation at a time. The founder, Dave Isay said, "You know, nobody has ever in the history of humanity changed their minds because they were being called an idiot or a moron or a snowflake."

 

[PoliticalChic]

There is a program called "One Small Step" where the get Americans from across the political spectrum to stop demonizing one another and start communicating - face to face, one conversation at a time. The founder, Dave Isay said, "You know, nobody has ever in the history of humanity changed their minds because they were being called an idiot or a moron or a snowflake."

As soon as you stop endorsing murder and oppression I will consider it.


Until then, I will continue to reveal the truth and defeat your lies.


See today's thread:

The Single Most Important Concept When Deciding Your Politics

1. It is the view that any political movement or concept has of human life. Mao…greatest mass murderer in the history of mankind. Stalin was number two on the hit parade, and Hitler, number three. And, coincidently, all had the word ‘socialist’ associated with them....just as the major...

www.usmessageboard.com

1. It is the view that any political movement or concept has of human life.
Mao…greatest mass murderer in the history of mankind. Stalin was number two on the hit parade, and Hitler, number three.
And, coincidently, all had the word ‘socialist’ associated with them....just as the major political party in this nation has.
And, that party has a soft spot for the three mentioned above.


2. "[Today], as we observe International Holocaust Remembrance Day, it is more important than ever to memorialize the six million Jews who were put to death and all those who have been targeted for genocide. It is equally important to understand how mass murder on an industrial scale can be repeated time and again as loving human beings are reduced into something subhuman by a regime that deems them worthy of destruction. Equally chilling is how, who, and why there are co-conspirators in the heinous act of genocide.

3. The words are haunting, as if a mourner's lament and offered prayers for the dead. "They Fell," written by Herbert Kretzmer, Charles Aznavour, and George Garvarentz, is a song that remembers the victims of the Armenian genocide, where as many as 1.2 million living under Ottoman rule died during World War I."

Words That Forbid Us from Looking Away from Genocide​

The words are haunting, as if a mourner's lament and offered prayers for the dead. "They Fell," written by Herbert Kretzmer, Charles Aznavour, and George Garvarentz, is a song that remembers the victims of the Armenian genocide, where as many as 1.2

www.gatestoneinstitute.org


4.



5. None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).

The Democrats check every one of those boxes.
They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.

They all follow Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."

 

[Flash]

President Potatohead is racist as hell.

The nitwit announced that he was going to use race as the criteria for a federal government hire.

Potatohead saying that he was going to nominate a Negro woman for the Supreme Court is in violation of the 1964 Civil Rights Acts.

 

[PoliticalChic]

President Potatohead is racist as hell.

The nitwit announced that he was going to use race as the criteria for a federal government hire.

Potatohead saying that he was going to nominate a Negro woman for the Supreme Court is in violation of the 1964 Civil Rights Acts.

"The nitwit announced that he was going to use race as the criteria for a federal government hire."


He's done it already.





"In an interview with Tucker Carlson, Clarke insisted that when employers hire people, skin color is highly relevant and should carry a “premium.” She even applied this rule to heart surgeons and airline pilots, jobs which have a direct impact on whether people live or die (see the video below at around the 2:30 mark). She called skin color “incredibly important” in making these hiring decisions.



In short, people should be judged by the color of their skin, after all — at least when it comes to employment decisions.



King’s statement about how people should be evaluated provides a good working definition of “racist.” If you evaluate people by the color of their skin, then you are a racist.



By that definition, Kristen Clarke is a racist."

Biden Pick for DOJ Civil Rights Division Wrote Blacks Are Superior Due to Melanin

'Melanin endows Blacks with greater mental, physical and spiritual abilities -- something which cannot be measured based on Eurocentric standards.'

legalinsurrection.com

“In her most recent letter to The Crimson, Clarke still refuses to take a stand: "[The Melanin Theory] is not necessarily something we believe, but some information we think those pursuing a true understanding of The Bell Curve should either address, ignore or refute."

Clarke's tactics are disturbing for several reasons. First, that Clarke refuses to explicitly deny the theories she has brought up raises the possibility that she actually believes them. Enough said.” Fire With Fire | Opinion | The Harvard Crimson







"Merrick Garland defends DOJ nominee Kristen Clarke, who called Blacks superior

Attorney General nominee Merrick Garland defended Kristen Clarke, the attorney tapped to lead the Justice Department’s civil rights division, during a heated exchange with Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, at his confirmation hearing on Monday.” Merrick Garland defends DOJ nominee Kristen Clarke, who called Blacks superior



They Were For It....And Now They're For It. #27



The 'Skin-Color Party'????





Let's check:

























============================================




"Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin.

Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994.

“Melanin endows blacks with greater mental, physical, and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured by Eurocentric standards.” Kristen Clarke wrote."







“Melanin Endows Blacks with Greater Mental, Physical and Spiritual Abilities” (VIDEO)
Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin. Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994. “Melanin endows blacks with greater ment ...
thespectator.info

What's wrong with racism?

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Jonathan Turley Warns Biden His Plan for Supreme Court Pick Is ‘Unconstitutional’​

Biden revealed that his requirement for his SCOTUS pick is that the nominee is black and female.
George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley has warned President Joe Biden that using identity politics to choose a Supreme Court justice is “unconstitutional.”

...using race and gender as a condition has already been ruled “unconstitutional” by the Supreme Court itself in other cases.



“The pledges that Biden has made amount to this.
“No matter how qualified men or, in the case of the Supreme Court, women who are not black may be, he will not consider them as candidates."

Jonathan Turley Warns Biden His Plan for Supreme Court Pick Is ‘Unconstitutional’ - Slay News

George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley has warned President Joe Biden that using identity politics to choose a Supreme Court justice is "unconstitutional."

slaynews.com

 

[LOIE]

As soon as you stop endorsing murder and oppression I will consider it.


Until then, I will continue to reveal the truth and defeat your lies.


See today's thread:

The Single Most Important Concept When Deciding Your Politics

1. It is the view that any political movement or concept has of human life. Mao…greatest mass murderer in the history of mankind. Stalin was number two on the hit parade, and Hitler, number three. And, coincidently, all had the word ‘socialist’ associated with them....just as the major...

www.usmessageboard.com

1. It is the view that any political movement or concept has of human life.
Mao…greatest mass murderer in the history of mankind. Stalin was number two on the hit parade, and Hitler, number three.
And, coincidently, all had the word ‘socialist’ associated with them....just as the major political party in this nation has.
And, that party has a soft spot for the three mentioned above.


2. "[Today], as we observe International Holocaust Remembrance Day, it is more important than ever to memorialize the six million Jews who were put to death and all those who have been targeted for genocide. It is equally important to understand how mass murder on an industrial scale can be repeated time and again as loving human beings are reduced into something subhuman by a regime that deems them worthy of destruction. Equally chilling is how, who, and why there are co-conspirators in the heinous act of genocide.

3. The words are haunting, as if a mourner's lament and offered prayers for the dead. "They Fell," written by Herbert Kretzmer, Charles Aznavour, and George Garvarentz, is a song that remembers the victims of the Armenian genocide, where as many as 1.2 million living under Ottoman rule died during World War I."

Words That Forbid Us from Looking Away from Genocide​

The words are haunting, as if a mourner's lament and offered prayers for the dead. "They Fell," written by Herbert Kretzmer, Charles Aznavour, and George Garvarentz, is a song that remembers the victims of the Armenian genocide, where as many as 1.2

www.gatestoneinstitute.org


4.



5. None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).

The Democrats check every one of those boxes.
They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.

They all follow Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."

BY JAMES WHITMAN



MARCH 21, 2017 2:00 PM EDT

Whitman is the Ford Foundation Professor of Comparative and Foreign Law at Yale Law School

"When we picture a modern American Nazi, we imagine a fanatic who has imported an alien belief system from a far-away place. We also, not wrongly, picture captives in concentration camps and American soldiers fighting the Good War. But the past is more tangled than that. Nazism was a movement drawn in some ways on the American model — a prodigal son of the land of liberty and equality, without the remorse.

In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, America led the world in race-based lawmaking, as a broad political consensus favored safeguarding the historically white character of the country. That is, it codified white nationalism. Congress passed immigration legislation designed to guarantee the predominance of immigrants from northern Europe, largely shutting the door on Jews, Italians, Asians and others. As Nazi commentators approvingly put it, this was law intended to keep out “undesirables.” (Attorney General Jeff Sessions(republican) said in a 2015 interview with White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon(republican) that that policy was “good for America.”) Jim Crow segregation blanketed the South. Thirty of the forty-eight states possessed anti-miscegenation legislation that prohibited interracial marriage — not only between whites and blacks, but also between whites and Asians — and sometimes threatened violators with harsh criminal punishment. In Maryland, they faced up to ten years in prison. Law made second-class citizens of blacks, Filipinos, Puerto Ricans, Asians and Native Americans. Most especially, it deprived these non-white Americans of any meaningful right to vote.

European racists took note. Among them was Adolf Hitler. In Mein Kampf, Hitler called America the “one state” making progress toward the creation of the kind of order he wanted for Germany. In 1935, the National Socialist Handbook on Law and Legislation, a basic guide for Nazis as they built their new society, would declare that the United States had achieved the “fundamental recognition” of the need for a race state.

Beyond its laws, the Nazis also admired America’s conquest of the West. In 1928, Hitler praised the Americans for having “gunned down the millions of Redskins to a few hundred thousand” in the course of founding their continental empire. And they knew that the United States had emerged as the dominant great power in the world after World War I. To them, racism had made America great. Plenty of Americans seemed to agree.

Of course, there was more to America than its racism. The Nazis despised the United States’ otherwise egalitarian and democratic traditions. Many of them believed that race-mixing would eventually doom America to decline. And they found it sad that American law had not yet targeted the race they regarded as the most dangerous of all: the Jews.

Nevertheless, American race law offered the model for anybody who sought to build a racist legal order. And after Hitler became Chancellor of the Reich and the Nazis took power in 1933, Nazi lawyers carefully studied the American example as they crafted the Nuremberg Laws, the most reviled race legislation of the twentieth century. Those laws followed the lead of the United States. They criminalized intermarriage; they relegated Jews to second-class citizenship. Their goal was to make Germany so frightening that the Jews would all flee.

That was the form that Nazism took in the early 1930s: It was about excluding and expelling outsiders, so that the “Aryans” of Germany could reclaim their dominant place in their country. Hitler and his followers were not yet planning the Final Solution. They were planning something different — something much closer to what the Far Right in Europe and the alt-right in America hope for today: The Nazi Party stood for the proposition that the benefits of life in Germany should be reserved for Germans alone.

Thankfully, we are still a long way from the 1930s. And thankfully, the very worst never happened here: Despite all of its similarities to, even its instructiveness for, the Germany of the 1930s, the United States did not fall into authoritarianism and become the Germany of the 1940s. America corrected its course. And the institutions that helped it do so — its courts, its civil rights infrastructure, its active democracy — remain intact."

From: USC “A Brief History of Jim Crow Laws”

"When World War II erupted and the United States entered the conflict, Jim Crow laws were still in force. Racial segregation was an integral part of society in some parts of the country, and so black men who served in the military were assigned to segregated divisions. Black servicemen were given lesser support positions such as grave-digging or cooking, and they were served food in separate lines from white servicemen. At first, black servicemen did not engage in combat, but as the war went on, increasing numbers were placed in front-line positions, where they served with distinction.

After World War II ended, America’s segregation policies were put under the microscope. President Harry Truman (a democrat) created a committee to investigate the issue, and in 1948, Truman issued an executive order that eliminated racial discrimination in all of the military branches. The tide began to turn noticeably toward equality in the following years with a series of Supreme Court victories for civil rights. Black people finally began breaking down racial barriers and challenging segregation with success, and the pinnacle of this effort was the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which abolished the Jim Crow laws. This law outlawed discrimination in any type of public accommodation. In 1965, the Voting Rights Act followed, which protected black people’s right to vote by barring discriminatory voting laws."


I noticed in one article I read on this subject that in a speech Hitler praised the settlers in the United States for gunning down the millions of Native Americans to a few hundred thousand. I thought to myself that these European settlers who arrived and gunned down millions of Native Americans were neither Republicans or Democrats. They were just people intent on taking and making a land for themselves without regard for human life. This was who Hitler admired. Not folks who years later would fight for the human rights and dignity of everyone.

 

[IM2]

"Does the party who gave us our first Black president and first Black female vice-president really adhere to all this nonsense?"


You're too dumb to realize you just proved what I said.


View attachment 592950

Try learning that king said other things.

"It would neither be true or honest to say that the Negros problem is what it is because he is innately inferior or because he is basically lazy and listless or because he has not lifted himself by his own bootstraps. To find the origins of the Negro problem we must turn to the white man's problem."

-Rev. Martin Luther King Jr

 

[PoliticalChic]

BY JAMES WHITMAN



MARCH 21, 2017 2:00 PM EDT

Whitman is the Ford Foundation Professor of Comparative and Foreign Law at Yale Law School

"When we picture a modern American Nazi, we imagine a fanatic who has imported an alien belief system from a far-away place. We also, not wrongly, picture captives in concentration camps and American soldiers fighting the Good War. But the past is more tangled than that. Nazism was a movement drawn in some ways on the American model — a prodigal son of the land of liberty and equality, without the remorse.

In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, America led the world in race-based lawmaking, as a broad political consensus favored safeguarding the historically white character of the country. That is, it codified white nationalism. Congress passed immigration legislation designed to guarantee the predominance of immigrants from northern Europe, largely shutting the door on Jews, Italians, Asians and others. As Nazi commentators approvingly put it, this was law intended to keep out “undesirables.” (Attorney General Jeff Sessions(republican) said in a 2015 interview with White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon(republican) that that policy was “good for America.”) Jim Crow segregation blanketed the South. Thirty of the forty-eight states possessed anti-miscegenation legislation that prohibited interracial marriage — not only between whites and blacks, but also between whites and Asians — and sometimes threatened violators with harsh criminal punishment. In Maryland, they faced up to ten years in prison. Law made second-class citizens of blacks, Filipinos, Puerto Ricans, Asians and Native Americans. Most especially, it deprived these non-white Americans of any meaningful right to vote.

European racists took note. Among them was Adolf Hitler. In Mein Kampf, Hitler called America the “one state” making progress toward the creation of the kind of order he wanted for Germany. In 1935, the National Socialist Handbook on Law and Legislation, a basic guide for Nazis as they built their new society, would declare that the United States had achieved the “fundamental recognition” of the need for a race state.

Beyond its laws, the Nazis also admired America’s conquest of the West. In 1928, Hitler praised the Americans for having “gunned down the millions of Redskins to a few hundred thousand” in the course of founding their continental empire. And they knew that the United States had emerged as the dominant great power in the world after World War I. To them, racism had made America great. Plenty of Americans seemed to agree.

Of course, there was more to America than its racism. The Nazis despised the United States’ otherwise egalitarian and democratic traditions. Many of them believed that race-mixing would eventually doom America to decline. And they found it sad that American law had not yet targeted the race they regarded as the most dangerous of all: the Jews.

Nevertheless, American race law offered the model for anybody who sought to build a racist legal order. And after Hitler became Chancellor of the Reich and the Nazis took power in 1933, Nazi lawyers carefully studied the American example as they crafted the Nuremberg Laws, the most reviled race legislation of the twentieth century. Those laws followed the lead of the United States. They criminalized intermarriage; they relegated Jews to second-class citizenship. Their goal was to make Germany so frightening that the Jews would all flee.

That was the form that Nazism took in the early 1930s: It was about excluding and expelling outsiders, so that the “Aryans” of Germany could reclaim their dominant place in their country. Hitler and his followers were not yet planning the Final Solution. They were planning something different — something much closer to what the Far Right in Europe and the alt-right in America hope for today: The Nazi Party stood for the proposition that the benefits of life in Germany should be reserved for Germans alone.

Thankfully, we are still a long way from the 1930s. And thankfully, the very worst never happened here: Despite all of its similarities to, even its instructiveness for, the Germany of the 1930s, the United States did not fall into authoritarianism and become the Germany of the 1940s. America corrected its course. And the institutions that helped it do so — its courts, its civil rights infrastructure, its active democracy — remain intact."

From: USC “A Brief History of Jim Crow Laws”

"When World War II erupted and the United States entered the conflict, Jim Crow laws were still in force. Racial segregation was an integral part of society in some parts of the country, and so black men who served in the military were assigned to segregated divisions. Black servicemen were given lesser support positions such as grave-digging or cooking, and they were served food in separate lines from white servicemen. At first, black servicemen did not engage in combat, but as the war went on, increasing numbers were placed in front-line positions, where they served with distinction.

After World War II ended, America’s segregation policies were put under the microscope. President Harry Truman (a democrat) created a committee to investigate the issue, and in 1948, Truman issued an executive order that eliminated racial discrimination in all of the military branches. The tide began to turn noticeably toward equality in the following years with a series of Supreme Court victories for civil rights. Black people finally began breaking down racial barriers and challenging segregation with success, and the pinnacle of this effort was the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which abolished the Jim Crow laws. This law outlawed discrimination in any type of public accommodation. In 1965, the Voting Rights Act followed, which protected black people’s right to vote by barring discriminatory voting laws."


I noticed in one article I read on this subject that in a speech Hitler praised the settlers in the United States for gunning down the millions of Native Americans to a few hundred thousand. I thought to myself that these European settlers who arrived and gunned down millions of Native Americans were neither Republicans or Democrats. They were just people intent on taking and making a land for themselves without regard for human life. This was who Hitler admired. Not folks who years later would fight for the human rights and dignity of everyone.

Every racist and Jim Crow law was written and carried out by the Democrat Party.



Every single one.


And that is the party you support......you dolt.




And pretty much everything in that professor's essay was a lie.

Do some research.



Democrat’s Bountiful Gifts To Our Black Brethren

1.Doubling down on their support for slavery and segregation, the Democrat Party blocked every anti-lynching to come to the Senate.

2. Dragging their feet on post-war freedom for their slaves, they imposed poll taxes and Jim Crow laws.

3. The Obama ‘Promise Program’ made it almost impossible to remove thugs and criminals from ghetto schools, to make certain that learning was impeded.

4. Authored gun laws that only law abiding citizens would obey, preventing black citizens in crime ridden neighborhood from protecting themselves.

5. Promoted bogus anti-police hatred, while ignoring some 350,000 blacks killed by lawless blacks. 324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years – American Free Press

6. In nearing a century of Democrat welfare, blacks remain as the lowest income racial group.

7. Allied with the International Left, the Democrat party makes certain that racial animosity never dies down.

8. The Democrats made and make certain that religion and morality is barred from the schools and from the public arena. “…will America be made better by curbing religion in the name of secularism, of vice versa?” Ben Shapiro


9. The Democrat judicial system is based on the idea that all blacks are felons, so felons must be released from jails. Carter-appointed judge Norma Shapiro “ is one of the worst offenders among that influential cadre of federal judges who have substituted the ACLU's prisoners' rights wish list for the Bill of Rights and have trifled with public safety concerns. …” In 1992, black youths were nine times more likely to be murdered than white youths. Democrats lied, kids died.

10. But wait…..they did manage to ban one single word from common parlance.


How stupid can you be??????

 

[PoliticalChic]

Try learning that king said other things.

"It would neither be true or honest to say that the Negros problem is what it is because he is innately inferior or because he is basically lazy and listless or because he has not lifted himself by his own bootstraps. To find the origins of the Negro problem we must turn to the white man's problem."

-Rev. Martin Luther King Jr

View attachment 593708

View attachment 593710

View attachment 593711

View attachment 593712

View attachment 593713
View attachment 593714

View attachment 593715

Did he say to judge people by their skin color, or genitalia???????



Must I educate you each and every day????????



There are only three things important to the Democrat program, agenda.....Race, Class, and Gender.
Not liberty, not religious freedom, not prosperity, not individuality, not tranquility.
Race, Class, and Gender.

“Cultural Marxism, though it’s dismissed by critics as a “term invented by the Right”, “was an undeniable school of thought taking Marxist categories of oppressed and oppressor beyond the economic realm and applying to it other forms of oppression: gender, race, sexuality.”
Caldron Pool



“A hundred years ago, kids in classrooms were taught the color of their skin was their most important characteristic — and if they looked a certain way, they were inferior. Today, kids again are being taught that the color of their skin defines them — and if they look a certain way, they’re an oppressor.” Tim Scott Text of Sen. Tim Scott's GOP response to Biden speech

 

[LOIE]

Try learning that king said other things.

"It would neither be true or honest to say that the Negros problem is what it is because he is innately inferior or because he is basically lazy and listless or because he has not lifted himself by his own bootstraps. To find the origins of the Negro problem we must turn to the white man's problem."

-Rev. Martin Luther King Jr

View attachment 593708

View attachment 593710

View attachment 593711

View attachment 593712

View attachment 593713
View attachment 593714

View attachment 593715

I think people pick and choose the quotes that make them feel comfortable. So much of what he said condemns racism in America. I just saw one of his speech writers, Clarence B. Jones answer this question. "What would Dr. King say about what is going on in America today?" He answered that he would say Black lives have always mattered and that we just need to get the society as a whole to admit that.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I think people pick and choose the quotes that make them feel comfortable. So much of what he said condemns racism in America. I just saw one of his speech writers, Clarence B. Jones answer this question. "What would Dr. King say about what is going on in America today?" He answered that he would say Black lives have always mattered and that we just need to get the society as a whole to admit that.

Is this or is it not an example of racism?

 

[LOIE]

Is this or is it not an example of racism?

No, I do not think so. The President was in the White House with the retiring justice. Had he been about to announce something that was racist and illegal, he certainly would have pointed it out to him before they went before the cameras. Someone else on this board suggested it was unfair to the many people who have been waiting for many years for such an opportunity. Well, what about the black women who are qualified and have also been waiting - most of the justices have been white men - women, and especially black women have been waiting since the court's inception. Seems to be like he's just balancing the scales of justice for people who have been left out.