why should anyone communicate with someone that makes up history to fit their needs?isis wasn't there in 2012 either.nope. let's start with the idea that there was an agreement to keep 10k troops would stay.wow. revisionist history sure is fun.
absolutely none of that post is historically accurate.
Except that's what happened sugar pants.
absolute bullshit. the status of forces agreement, signed by president bush, required the withdrawal of all forces from iraq by the end of 2011.
historical fact.
Yes when GWB signed that ISIS hadn't appeared.
When ISIS appeared the Military wanted not ALL troops withdrawing, but Obama ignored them and withdrew ALL troops.
U.S. troop withdrawal let Islamic State enter Iraq, military leaders say
U.S. troop withdrawal let Islamic State enter Iraq, military leaders say
I suppose Libya wasn't Obama's fault? Who do the Obamabots want to blame Libya on?
you are re-writing history, just like when you claimed there was an 'agreement' that obama changed that would have kept 10k troops there
Why should anyone even communicate with people who say that people on the Right are happy when Western troops are dying?
When people are saying that people on the right are unhappy that ISIS have lost something?
Not many, if any people on the Right spend inordinate amounts of time being apologists for Islam and all things Islamic and not many, if any people on the Right badmouth the Armed Forces....both of these things though are frequently the modus operandi of a majority of Leftists.