ISIS is alive, Solyndra is dead

[P@triot]

Kosh 14248632

Romany was right about a lot of things and Obama has been proven wrong to run the far left play book.

A lot things? Just name one? Enough with the generalities. Historical proof is what I'm looking for.

I already provided you with all of them. All you did was throw a tantrum like a small child. History has unequivocally proven Romney had unmatched foresight and Obama is a lost little child who is too busy playing golf and exploiting the White House (access to fine golf course, trips to Martha's Vineyards, etc.) to get a handle on geopolitical and national security issues.

 

[P@triot]

See how the far left will deny their messiah allowed ISIS to spread like a virus because of horrid far left policies..

And what is known as ISIS was created in 1999..

See how the far left will deny history, but for them history starts in 2003..

It's chilling to see these people protecting "dear leader" at all costs. They remind me of the scared and mindless souls of North Korea. History has proven everything and despite the fact that we were all witness to it, they are trying to deny what happened.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Rottweiler 14249112

History has proven everything and despite the fact that we were all witness to it, they are trying to deny what happened.

You have listed nothing. What proves that Russia is our biggest Geo-Political Foe since you said they are not a threat. What have they done historically that tops the U.S.?

You can't think of anything?

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Kosh 14248958

He was right about Russia, he was right about pulling out of Iraq, he was right about the economy, etc..

Right about what about Russia? What has Russia done that he was right about? Crimea voted to depart the rightwing whackos in Ukraine. Romney could not have stopped it. Romney likely would have made it worse. That ain't being right. That's being an idiot.

Romney was not right about Iraq. The Iraqis did not want us there and Bush set the last day we could be there.

And Romney said in 2014 on Iraq that he hoped No American combat troops would need to go back in. So he hoped Obama's 'advisers only' on the ground in Iraq worked. Well it's working - proving Obama right on Iraq. Romney's just an armchair wanna be CinC at this point because he is a loser.

He was wrong about staying in Iraq against the will of the Iraqi people. He's a moron when he suggests we had a right to keep troops there if we so chose. That is a moronic view almost as stupid as Bush going in in the first place.

The economy? Don't make me laugh. Romney said his Econ policies would take four years to get unemployment below 6 percent. Obama did it in two years. 14 million new jobs and over six years of steady job growth.

Romney admitted he could do no better. He was right about that if you want sonething - but that has nothing to do with Russia.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Romany was right about a lot of things and Obama has been proven wrong to run the far left play book.

What far left playbook. Sanders holds the far left playbook. Can you post a copy?

 

[JoeB131]

Russia has conducted military operations in Syria and Ukraine against the U.S.

Um, Poodle, why should America give a fuck about what is going on in the Ukraine or Syria? how are the Russians acting agianst us when they attack people we really don't care about?

 

[P@triot]

The video here is a must see. It's astounding the foresight that Mitt Romney displayed 4 years ago and the astounding ignorant Barry Obama displayed despite having volumes of national security briefings at his fingertips. Of course, if you skip national security council meetings and skip reading the briefs in order to golf and snort coke with JayZ and Beyonce, one would be astoundingly ignorant of threats.

Obama Taunts Putin’s Satanic Nukes

 

[P@triot]

What proves that Russia is our biggest Geo-Political Foe

Post #87, stupid. Denying reality doesn't make it go away. It just makes you look as uninformed as Barack. But at least he has some good stories to tell - he was busy golfing at the finest courses around the world and doing blow with JayZ and Beyonce. What's your excuse for being so uninformed?

 

[P@triot]

Maddening. We had an ally controlling Libya. He had surrendered his entire nuclear arsenal to us post-9/11. He kept the radical muslim / ISIS idiots suppressed and in check. Obama, in all of his glorious ignorance (mixed with his devotion to islam), goes in unprovoked and leads an illegal war agains Qaddafi. They take him out of power, allow the people to kill him, and turn the country over to ISIS. Now, after realizing how insanely stupid that is, Obama wants to go back into Libya and arm other people to drive out ISIS and the Muslim Brotherhood.

God Almighty is Barack Obama the most profoundly ignorant leader the U.S. has ever seen. History has proven that Mitt Romney humiliated him on maters of national security four years ago during the debates. This guy is such a hard-line ideologue and his refusal to stop golfing or snorting blow with JayZ in order to attend National Security Council meetings lead to an awful mess which will haunt us for decades to come.

U.S., Other World Powers ‘Ready’ to Arm Libyan Government in Fight Against Islamic State

 

[JoeB131]

Maddening. We had an ally controlling Libya. He had surrendered his entire nuclear arsenal to us post-9/11. He kept the radical muslim / ISIS idiots suppressed and in check.

Are you seriously arguing the Khadafy was our "ally", Poodle? The guy who blew up Pan Am 103 and the Disco in Berlin was now our "Ally" because he gave up a weapons program that wasn't going anywhere to try to attract more European investment isn't an "ally".

Obama, in all of his glorious ignorance (mixed with his devotion to islam), goes in unprovoked and leads an illegal war agains Qaddafi. They take him out of power, allow the people to kill him, and turn the country over to ISIS. Now, after realizing how insanely stupid that is, Obama wants to go back into Libya and arm other people to drive out ISIS and the Muslim Brotherhood.

I think there is a lot to criticize in our Libyan Policy, but the Europeans were the ones who did most of the instigating against Khadafy, not Obama. Khadafy was going down for one good reason. Libyans wouldn't fight for him. At the end, he relied on African Mercenaries to prop up his regime, and they quit when the money ran out.

God Almighty is Barack Obama the most profoundly ignorant leader the U.S. has ever seen. History has proven that Mitt Romney humiliated him on maters of national security four years ago during the debates. This guy is such a hard-line ideologue and his refusal to stop golfing or snorting blow with JayZ in order to attend National Security Council meetings lead to an awful mess which will haunt us for decades to come.

Guy, the Weird MOrmon Robot was happy to send other people's kids off to war (not his own little Mormon Darlings). Nothing in Libya or Syria or the Ukraine is worth ONE AMERICAN LIFE.

 

[P@triot]

Another prime example of how liberalism forces jobs overseas and destroys economies...

More than $22 billion per year in new regulatory costs were imposed on Americans last year, pushing the total burden for the Obama years to exceed $100 billion annually.

20,642 New Regulations Added in the Obama Presidency

 

[P@triot]

And to think that this is how liberals want the entire nation to function. Under the control of an inefficient, irresponsible, incompetent government...

The unspoken reason the TSA is so terrible

 

[P@triot]

More indisputable evidence of the failure that is the liberal ideology...

How many of the people who are demanding an increase in the minimum wage have ever bothered to check what actually happens when higher minimum wages are imposed? More often they just assume what is assumed by like-minded peers – with their assumptions being what “everybody knows.”

Back in 1948, when inflation had rendered meaningless the minimum wage established a decade earlier, the unemployment rate among 16-17-year-old black males was under 10%. But after the minimum wage was raised repeatedly to keep up with inflation, the unemployment rate for black males that age was never under 30% from 1971-94. In many of those years, the rate exceeded 40%, and, for a couple of years, it exceeded 50%.

A little thinking debunks promises of socialism

 

[Clementine]

You don't read the headlines about it? Ever?

Most headlines these days are click bait and they rarely match the story. I know some liberals who rely on headlines and talking points to stay on top of things. That's why they can't discuss things. And why is it that libs often bitch when posts or articles posted are too long? Is reading just not their thing?

 

[Moonglow]

You don't read the headlines about it? Ever?

Most headlines these days are click bait and they rarely match the story. I know some liberals who rely on headlines and talking points to stay on top of things. That's why they can't discuss things. And why is it that libs often bitch when posts or articles posted are too long? Is reading just not their thing?

I call them minimalist, and it is done by lazy folks..

 

[JoeB131]

Back in 1948, when inflation had rendered meaningless the minimum wage established a decade earlier, the unemployment rate among 16-17-year-old black males was under 10%. But after the minimum wage was raised repeatedly to keep up with inflation, the unemployment rate for black males that age was never under 30% from 1971-94. In many of those years, the rate exceeded 40%, and, for a couple of years, it exceeded 50%.

Poodle, someone should have explained to you at an early age that correlation doesn't equal causation.

Here was the thing. Back in 1948, we were doing industry with very little automation, so it wasn't a problem of what the jobs paid. The fact is, in 1948, most of Europe was still in ruins and the US had a monopoly on manufacturing in the world.

By 1971, the Japanese and German industrial machines were running at full tilt while the US didn't modernize. That's why unemployment spiked in the black community, not because you actually had to pay them 1.60 an hour.

 

[Moonglow]

Do CEO's know that their jobs can be replaced by a computer, with a programmer that earns a small fraction of what they earn?

 

[P@triot]

Do CEO's know that their jobs can be replaced by a computer, with a programmer that earns a small fraction of what they earn?

If you can pull that off, you're going to be a trillionaire. Even the most advanced artificial intelligence in the world can't even remotely operate at that level. They can barely handle a phone tree option

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I love this threads title

 

[Moonglow]

Do CEO's know that their jobs can be replaced by a computer, with a programmer that earns a small fraction of what they earn?

If you can pull that off, you're going to be a trillionaire. Even the most advanced artificial intelligence in the world can't even remotely operate at that level. They can barely handle a phone tree option

Since cpu's are using a tree phone option, it will be no time before the robotic CEO can be made to accomplish power lunches and golf games....