RoccoR
Gold Member
RE: Israel races to head off UN settlement 'blacklist'
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,
That is correct. Occupying powers do not acquire sovereignty --- merely through the act of occupation. But once the Occupying Power (through their own initiative and not by Mandate) begins to assume all the normal functions of government the real-world reality changes; without regard to what the rest of the world calls it.
I'm not confusing anything. You don't want to recognize the consequence of the Hostile Arab Palestinians refusing to make peace and refusing to make those apprehensions of those Hostile Arab Palestinian organizations still considered as Jihadist, the Fedayeen, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric fighters.
Israel actually holds the card. But, like I said before, I doubt the Israelis will press that advantage because they don't want a flood of Jihadist, the Fedayeen, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric fighters becoming citizens and endangering the integrity of the state.
BUT --- the Occupation can prevent the Arab Palestinian from exercising the three dimensions — the holder of sovereignty, the absoluteness of sovereignty, and the internal and external dimensions of sovereignty. (substantive revision Fri Mar 25, 2016 --- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
The occupation power can prevent the West Bank Arab Palestinians from establishing their initial condition of sovereignty. The Israelis can not void sovereignty if the Arab Palestinians already had sovereignty. But they did not. The sovereign control by the Jordanians (whether or not you accept it as legitimate) was vacated and abandon by the Jordanians; leaving it in the hands of the Israeli effective control. With the exception of the Gaza Strip (which a majority of Arab Palestinians claim is under occupation), and territory under Oslo Accord Area "A" --- the Arab Palestinian has not been able to establish themselves as the ultimate overseer, or authority, in the decision-making process over Areas "B" and "C" --- and in the maintenance of good order.
Most Respectfully,
R
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,
That is correct. Occupying powers do not acquire sovereignty --- merely through the act of occupation. But once the Occupying Power (through their own initiative and not by Mandate) begins to assume all the normal functions of government the real-world reality changes; without regard to what the rest of the world calls it.
✪ IF Israel's signature feature of any portion of the territory is supreme authority within a territory and expresses it intention of never relinquishing that authority .
✪ THEN no matter what you call it, what resolutions says what, the actual existence meets the standard of becoming (if nothing else) an unincorporated and unorganized territory (Convention on Rights and Duties of States)(recognition not required); at the discretion of the Israeli authorities exercising supreme authority within a territory.
✪ THEN no matter what you call it, what resolutions says what, the actual existence meets the standard of becoming (if nothing else) an unincorporated and unorganized territory (Convention on Rights and Duties of States)(recognition not required); at the discretion of the Israeli authorities exercising supreme authority within a territory.
I'm not confusing anything. You don't want to recognize the consequence of the Hostile Arab Palestinians refusing to make peace and refusing to make those apprehensions of those Hostile Arab Palestinian organizations still considered as Jihadist, the Fedayeen, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric fighters.
Israel actually holds the card. But, like I said before, I doubt the Israelis will press that advantage because they don't want a flood of Jihadist, the Fedayeen, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric fighters becoming citizens and endangering the integrity of the state.
(COMMENT)
BUT --- the Occupation can prevent the Arab Palestinian from exercising the three dimensions — the holder of sovereignty, the absoluteness of sovereignty, and the internal and external dimensions of sovereignty. (substantive revision Fri Mar 25, 2016 --- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Written By: The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica
Sovereignty, in political theory, the ultimate overseer, or authority, in the decision-making process of the state and in the maintenance of order. The concept of sovereignty—one of the most controversial ideas in political science and international law—is closely related to the difficult concepts of state and government and of independence and democracy.
Sovereignty, in political theory, the ultimate overseer, or authority, in the decision-making process of the state and in the maintenance of order. The concept of sovereignty—one of the most controversial ideas in political science and international law—is closely related to the difficult concepts of state and government and of independence and democracy.
The occupation power can prevent the West Bank Arab Palestinians from establishing their initial condition of sovereignty. The Israelis can not void sovereignty if the Arab Palestinians already had sovereignty. But they did not. The sovereign control by the Jordanians (whether or not you accept it as legitimate) was vacated and abandon by the Jordanians; leaving it in the hands of the Israeli effective control. With the exception of the Gaza Strip (which a majority of Arab Palestinians claim is under occupation), and territory under Oslo Accord Area "A" --- the Arab Palestinian has not been able to establish themselves as the ultimate overseer, or authority, in the decision-making process over Areas "B" and "C" --- and in the maintenance of good order.
Most Respectfully,
R
Last edited:
