- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #61
Well You see You've got an opportunity with this 2 acts that have to much coincidence involved, to bash and jump at conclusions.
The first association for anyone, including average Israeli is that "תג מחיר"
shows clear connection. But that's just the obvious one...mind You too obvious and correlated.
For us it's another opportunity to see how a "gut feeling" is considered more factual than evidence. That's all. If those were really "settlers" they deserve a fair trial. I won't go saying it was a set-up because of my
gut-feeling that all of those were set-up. Crime is a crime.
But You jump to conclusions and manipulate information with no evidence. There're many "journalists" who jump such trains playing the emotion card on the public, but their amount doesn't qualify as evidence.
Do You believe in fair trial, abiding the laws of Your country?
Yes they do deserve a fair trial. I've never said otherwise - I believe in law.
Specifically - where have I manipulated information "with no evidence" - the speculation that it is settler extremists is not "my manipulation" it's based on statements from the IDF and I assume they know what they are talking about.
In a statement, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) described the arson as "a terror attack".
"The preliminary investigation suggests that suspects entered the village in the early hours of the morning, set the homes ablaze and sprayed graffiti in Hebrew on the homes," it said. The statement added that IDF forces are currently operating in order to locate the suspects of this attack.
Funny thing though - I never hear this argument from you guys when a Palestinian is suspected of a crime such as when the Fogel family was murdered. I look forward to seeing that condemnation of "hasty assumptions" from you in the future
The articles You've posted claim much but don't show ANY sources.
The manipulation is in Your post, and in the way You use Your position as a 'staff-member'. Your tactics are no better than those pseudo journalists. Manipulation is trying to back up the opening post by even more posts that don't present any evidence rather than play on emotions.
That is the second time you have brought that up. If you have a problem with me as a staff member - pm my boss. If you have a problem responding to a simple debate in a coherent and logical manner (not to mention backing up your claims with something beyond gibberish) - then I can't help you. Thus far - your only contribution has been to throw monkey poo at the topic.