It's Happening!

Do you doubt the % or you have insights we don’t ?
He made a statement, unsupportable. I simply asked for a link. He didn't have any. Is some slight supporting fact or example to much to ask, or is that only for normal people that don't swallow BS from the internet?
 
30 years ago NPR and PBS news had a very high reputation for accuracy. Damn near pristine.
Slowly over the past 20 years especially, they went farther and farther left. Which coincides exactly when our high education institutions - also - went farther and farther left.
And now today, they are absolutely leftist propaganda outlets.
 
He made a statement, unsupportable. I simply asked for a link. He didn't have any. Is some slight supporting fact or example to much to ask, or is that only for normal people that don't swallow BS from the internet?
My guess is he could only be off by no more than 2-4 but that is my optimism
 
30% of this country, better known as "The Cult", will stand proudly with this arsonist as he burns down everything around him.

The Great Leap Backwards continues.
 
30 years ago NPR and PBS news had a very high reputation for accuracy. Damn near pristine.
Slowly over the past 20 years especially, they went farther and farther left. Which coincides exactly when our high education institutions - also - went farther and farther left.
And now today, they are absolutely leftist propaganda outlets.
OK. What story did they publish which was false? Their actual news segments are very short, without much time for editorializing. So, they had to have gotten something wrong, for you to believe that. What was it? If you want to step in to support his claim or your own, I welcome it. What did they get wrong? Got a link?
 
OK. What story did they publish which was false? Their actual news segments are very short, without much time for editorializing. So, they had to have gotten something wrong, for you to believe that. What was it? If you want to step in to support his claim or your own, I welcome it. What did they get wrong? Got a link?
roll eyes.webp
 
OK. What story did they publish which was false? Their actual news segments are very short, without much time for editorializing. So, they had to have gotten something wrong, for you to believe that. What was it? If you want to step in to support his claim or your own, I welcome it. What did they get wrong? Got a link?
They can't answer that, they listen to FOX News and believe every word of it, to say nothing else of the far worse news outlets they scour over for their disinformation and propaganda.

They are a credible news outfit, their reporters, regardless of bias, are committed to getting the story correct. Liberals and authoritarians do not mix, so of course don't expect positive stories on Trump. The truth is that you can't write positive stories on Trump if you are an actual journalist because the negative stories outnumber whatever you could find positive by 20-1, 40-1, 100-1? You have a job to do, and there is not enough time to list all the transgressions of this administration. There simply isn't.

Yea, show us what they got "wrong", not what hurt your feelings. We all know that anything other than priaise for Dear Leader makes you a target of this wrath.
 
Inform yourself, you might feel better.

As Berliner writes: “Concerned by the lack of viewpoint diversity, I looked at voter registration for our newsroom. In D.C., where NPR is headquartered and many of us live, I found 87 registered Democrats working in editorial positions and zero Republicans. None.”


When you've read the above, I suggest you also read the below:

Whitey doesn't like being proven wrong. So he'll just ignore it.
 
He made a statement, unsupportable. I simply asked for a link. He didn't have any. Is some slight supporting fact or example to much to ask, or is that only for normal people that don't swallow BS from the internet?
Ummmmm, he supported it...

DURRRRRR
 
30% of this country, better known as "The Cult", will stand proudly with this arsonist as he burns down everything around him.
The Great Leap Backwards continues.
Trump is prying off the cold dead fingers that the democrats think they have on the federal government.
If you want npr and pbs to continue just sell commercials, duh.
 
Trump has no legal authority to do this, so it won’t be much of a challenge.
He could transfer the money to conservative talk radio shows. Would that be okay with you? The government shouldn't fund any tv networks, if they can't make on their own. They are not needed, and liberal PBS wouldn't make it on their own.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom