Its the economy stupid. Huh, curious timing with the Flynn fake news and tax reform.....huh

[Fort Fun Indiana]

US Senators: "Not quite sure what's in the bill"

USMB posters: "Greatest tax bill ever!"

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

This person is not in that job as he pulled his nomination since he has been linked to the Russia probe.

What was the official job title for that position?

The Chief Scientist of the USDA is the position I am speaking of

Yes, but what is the official title (it's not Chief Scientist)?

Yes, that is the title.

https://agriculture.house.gov/uploadedfiles/woteki_testimony.pdf
View attachment 164099

Thanks.
The actual position title is Under Secretary for Research, Education and Economics

Chavonda Jacobs-Young, Acting Under Secretary for REE Mission Area

About the Office of the Chief Scientist | USDA


Now Trump is appointing Clovis to be Under Secretary for Research, Education and Economics (REE) at the Department of Agriculture. This administrator is responsible for a large portfolio of research conducted by and supported by the USDA, including NIFA, the National Institute for Food and Agriculture.

Incompetence Looms: Trump To Appoint Non-Scientist As USDA's Chief Scientist

Administrator? That's a relief. Sounds more like a paper pusher than a scientist.

The Under Secretary for Research, Education, and Economics is a high-ranking official within the United States Department of Agriculture that provides leadership and oversight for the Agricultural Research Service, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Economic Research Service, National Agricultural Library, National Agricultural Statistics Service.

Under Secretary of Agriculture for Research, Education, and Economics - Wikipedia

 

[mamooth]

What a stupid f^ing comment. A tax cut puts MORE spending money into the economy, idiot.

So, you're completely clueless about how real economies work. That is, you're a conservative.

Tax cuts for the rich don't put money into the economy. The rich just bank it, or use the money to buy the T-bills that were needed to finance the deficit that the tax cuts create.

Also, there's no shortage of investment capital, so claiming there's more available is a red herring. Investment happens when there's a demand for a product or service. Nobody invests in a new product if there's no demand for it.

That is, economies are demand-driven. Only supply-side cult kooks think economies are supply-driven.

So, what drives the demand that drives investment? Middle class spending.

And Trump's tax increase just made sure there will be less of that.

 

[mamooth]

They keep saying "obama's economy."

So, what has Trump done to change it? You've never told us. Instead, you get hysterical as a way to evade the simple question.

I have repeated this a thousand times.

Repeating your fairy tales many times doesn't make them less dopey.

Might as well be one more time. The commies took over power in 2007.

We get it, snowflake. You're too wimpy and stupid to make an actual argument, so you just rage-weep about commies. Such a good cult boi you are.

You're also a remarkably stupid cult boi. The point I made is that the current economy is Obama's economy. Screaming about what happened in the past has no bearing on that. It just makes you look dumb. I mean, if the Democrats were so awful, then why are you saying the current economy, Obama's economy, is so good? You need to get new cult talking points, because the ones you have make no sense.

It's not Trump's economy until he does something significant to change it. He didn't before. He did now. So, after the middle class tax increases are implemented and have their effect, that will be Trump's economy.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

What a stupid f^ing comment. A tax cut puts MORE spending money into the economy, idiot.

So, you're completely clueless about how real economies work. That is, you're a conservative.

Tax cuts for the rich don't put money into the economy. The rich just bank it, or use the money to buy the T-bills that were needed to finance the deficit that the tax cuts create.

Also, there's no shortage of investment capital, so claiming there's more available is a red herring. Investment happens when there's a demand for a product or service. Nobody invests in a new product if there's no demand for it.

That is, economies are demand-driven. Only supply-side cult kooks think economies are supply-driven.

So, what drives the demand that drives investment? Middle class spending.

And Trump's tax increase just made sure there will be less of that.

Also, there's no shortage of investment capital,

Why do you think that is the case?

And Trump's tax increase just made sure there will be less of that.

Increase? LOL!

 

[S.J.]

What a stupid f^ing comment. A tax cut puts MORE spending money into the economy, idiot.

So, you're completely clueless about how real economies work. That is, you're a conservative.

Tax cuts for the rich don't put money into the economy. The rich just bank it, or use the money to buy the T-bills that were needed to finance the deficit that the tax cuts create.

Also, there's no shortage of investment capital, so claiming there's more available is a red herring. Investment happens when there's a demand for a product or service. Nobody invests in a new product if there's no demand for it.

That is, economies are demand-driven. Only supply-side cult kooks think economies are supply-driven.

So, what drives the demand that drives investment? Middle class spending.

And Trump's tax increase just made sure there will be less of that.

Also, there's no shortage of investment capital,

Why do you think that is the case?

And Trump's tax increase just made sure there will be less of that.

Increase? LOL!

And the dumb SOB thinks I'M clueless about how the economy works.

 

[jc456]

They keep saying "obama's economy."

So, what has Trump done to change it? You've never told us. Instead, you get hysterical as a way to evade the simple question.

I have repeated this a thousand times.

Repeating your fairy tales many times doesn't make them less dopey.

Might as well be one more time. The commies took over power in 2007.

We get it, snowflake. You're too wimpy and stupid to make an actual argument, so you just rage-weep about commies. Such a good cult boi you are.

You're also a remarkably stupid cult boi. The point I made is that the current economy is Obama's economy. Screaming about what happened in the past has no bearing on that. It just makes you look dumb. I mean, if the Democrats were so awful, then why are you saying the current economy, Obama's economy, is so good? You need to get new cult talking points, because the ones you have make no sense.

It's not Trump's economy until he does something significant to change it. He didn't before. He did now. So, after the middle class tax increases are implemented and have their effect, that will be Trump's economy.

Its obvious you missed the EOs on regulations. You’re a simpleton