Just when you thought it couldn't get any better. It keeps coming.
“[T]here are serious questions whether the Attorney General has violated that structure by creating an office of the Special Counsel that has not been established by law,” Thomas wrote, arguing that “[t]hose questions must be answered before this prosecution can proceed.”
The justice explained Garland “purported to appoint a private citizen as Special Counsel to prosecute a former President on behalf of the United States” but “If there is no law establishing the office that the Special Counsel occupies, then he cannot proceed with this prosecution.”
“[T]here are serious questions whether the Attorney General has violated that structure by creating an office of the Special Counsel that has not been established by law,” Thomas wrote, arguing that “[t]hose questions must be answered before this prosecution can proceed.”
The justice explained Garland “purported to appoint a private citizen as Special Counsel to prosecute a former President on behalf of the United States” but “If there is no law establishing the office that the Special Counsel occupies, then he cannot proceed with this prosecution.”
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas suggests Trump special counsel was illegally appointed
In the Supreme Court’s monumental decision in former President Trump’s immunity case, one justice questioned whether Special Counsel Jack Smith – at the helm of Trump’s unpreceden…
nypost.com