Remodeling Maidiac
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2011
- 101,230
- 46,221
- Thread starter
- #61
Can we get a black man over here stat. We can't have a white man cutting the ribbon. Just outrageous lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your point? The debate for renaming it went on for years. Started somewhere no?This is shown in header of the linked article :Horseshit! You were just trying to stir the pot. The article is dated October 2015 and not relevant to today or in 2015 in POLITICS but rather in the HISTORY forum now, ya shit slinger!I read the entire link dumbass. Why else would I say I couldn't find a link with the full story.Grampa is just looking for something to be outraged about. I find it funny that he didn't check his own link which gives the reason, as well as says that Trump is the one that signed it into law, meaning Trump is responsible for the name change, because he could have vetoed it.
It seems it is YOU who can not read.
And yes, it is a reason to bitch.
Actually, in his first one, it's dated Feb of 2018, so it's still kinda current.
"October 28, 2015 4:34 AM ET
Heard on Morning Edition
My point was a response to another claiming the date of a certain article cited in the OP was 2018 was in error. The debate you're speaking of was not a part of that exchange.Your point? The debate for renaming it went on for years. Started somewhere no?
I changed the link in the op shortly after opening the thread. The first responses were accurate to that point.Your point? The debate for renaming it went on for years. Started somewhere no?This is shown in header of the linked article :Horseshit! You were just trying to stir the pot. The article is dated October 2015 and not relevant to today or in 2015 in POLITICS but rather in the HISTORY forum now, ya shit slinger!I read the entire link dumbass. Why else would I say I couldn't find a link with the full story.
It seems it is YOU who can not read.
And yes, it is a reason to bitch.
Actually, in his first one, it's dated Feb of 2018, so it's still kinda current.
"October 28, 2015 4:34 AM ET
Heard on Morning EditionMy point was a response to another claiming the date of a certain article cited in the OP was 2018 was in error. The debate you're speaking of was not a part of that exchange.Your point? The debate for renaming it went on for years. Started somewhere no?
Can't you follow the thread back to find the reason yourself, Gramps? You're off on something else altogether!
I changed the link in the op shortly after opening the thread. The first responses were accurate to that point.Your point? The debate for renaming it went on for years. Started somewhere no?This is shown in header of the linked article :Horseshit! You were just trying to stir the pot. The article is dated October 2015 and not relevant to today or in 2015 in POLITICS but rather in the HISTORY forum now, ya shit slinger!
Actually, in his first one, it's dated Feb of 2018, so it's still kinda current.
"October 28, 2015 4:34 AM ET
Heard on Morning EditionMy point was a response to another claiming the date of a certain article cited in the OP was 2018 was in error. The debate you're speaking of was not a part of that exchange.Your point? The debate for renaming it went on for years. Started somewhere no?
Can't you follow the thread back to find the reason yourself, Gramps? You're off on something else altogether!
EVERY time I go to that link posted in the OP it has had the date of October 28, 2015 4:34 AM ET, and it STILL does. Also the last paragraph in the article dates it as written before 2017 in this sentence; "When the museum reopens in 2017, it may be known simply as the Arch Museum instead of the Museum of Westward Expansion." Here is the link I got AGAIN!I changed the link in the op shortly after opening the thread. The first responses were accurate to that point.
Are you daft?I changed the link in the op shortly after opening the thread. The first responses were accurate to that point.Your point? The debate for renaming it went on for years. Started somewhere no?This is shown in header of the linked article :Actually, in his first one, it's dated Feb of 2018, so it's still kinda current.
"October 28, 2015 4:34 AM ET
Heard on Morning EditionMy point was a response to another claiming the date of a certain article cited in the OP was 2018 was in error. The debate you're speaking of was not a part of that exchange.Your point? The debate for renaming it went on for years. Started somewhere no?
Can't you follow the thread back to find the reason yourself, Gramps? You're off on something else altogether!EVERY time I go to that link posted in the OP it has had the date of October 28, 2015 4:34 AM ET, and it STILL does. Also the last paragraph in the article dates it as written before 2017 in this sentence; "When the museum reopens in 2017, it may be known simply as the Arch Museum instead of the Museum of Westward Expansion." Here is the link I got AGAIN!I changed the link in the op shortly after opening the thread. The first responses were accurate to that point.
~~ As Gateway Arch Turns 50, Its Message Gets Reframed ~~
You're really fucking confused, moron! Let me repeat for your tiny little 4 cell synapse unit rolling around inside your skullAre you daft?
I CHANGED THE LINK BEFORE YOU EVER CAME TO THE THREAD. So what you see is not the same.
Ffs
You chose not to respond to that! Now piss off you mouthy little fuck! Trying to show your type some modicum of respect is a fools errand since you jerks just want to heap the ad hominem while you're dodging addressing the thrust of a post. So fuck you very much! I'm not playing your game!Horseshit! You were just trying to stir the pot. The article is dated October 2015 and not relevant to today or in 2015 in POLITICS but rather in the HISTORY forum now, ya shit slinger!
My complaint is leftist revisionism and whitewashing history to protect feelings.More revisionist history bullshit. Gotta whitewash that American history ya know! And they also said the old name promoted the MYTH of American Exceptionalism.
I can not find a link that lists the specific reasons for the name change but it has been a hot topic of contention on local radio today.
As Gateway Arch Turns 50, Its Message Gets Reframed
Oh no! Now we are only left with 10,000 other things named after Thomas Jefferson!
What is your complaint exactly ?
All part of the Communist Agenda. Folks really should see 'Agenda: Grinding Down America.' It's currently airing on Amazon Prime. Communists are very patient. Their Agenda has been ongoing for almost 100yrs. They advance their Agenda in increments. Most will dismiss this incident as being 'meaningless', but it's actually another small victory for the Communists/Democrats. Remember, they're fine advancing their Agenda in increments.
That steadfast patience has allowed them to seize absolute control of our Government Schooling and Entertainment/'News' Media. It didn't happen overnight. It took years. This is just another example of them destroying anything they deem 'Too American.' It's all about destroying our nation's sovereignty and identity. Just look to their Open Borders Agenda for more disturbing proof of that. So yes, this is a small achievement for them, but it is another victory. Folks just need to become informed about the Communist Agenda. Because they're not going away. Citizens have to face that, and stand up to them. I hope & pray they do that sooner, rather than later. The clock is ticking.
Jesus. It is like you thin-skinned pseuedocons spend every day looking for a reason to have your feelings hurt.More revisionist history bullshit. Gotta whitewash that American history ya know! And they also said the old name promoted the MYTH of American Exceptionalism.
I can not find a link that lists the specific reasons for the name change but it has been a hot topic of contention on local radio today.
As Gateway Arch Turns 50, Its Message Gets Reframed
What game is that. The only game I see being played is you chasing your tail.You're really fucking confused, moron! Let me repeat for your tiny little 4 cell synapse unit rolling around inside your skullAre you daft?
I CHANGED THE LINK BEFORE YOU EVER CAME TO THE THREAD. So what you see is not the same.
Ffs
You chose not to respond to that! Now piss off you mouthy little fuck! Trying to show your type some modicum of respect is a fools errand since you jerks just want to heap the ad hominem while you're dodging addressing the thrust of a post. So fuck you very much! I'm not playing your game!Horseshit! You were just trying to stir the pot. The article is dated October 2015 and not relevant to today or in 2015 in POLITICS but rather in the HISTORY forum now, ya shit slinger!
So which Tard Herd Facebook feed or pseudocon podcast or fake news network brought up this story from three years ago for you to get your panties in a bunch over?
Jesus. It is like you thin-skinned pseuedocons spend every day looking for a reason to have your feelings hurt.More revisionist history bullshit. Gotta whitewash that American history ya know! And they also said the old name promoted the MYTH of American Exceptionalism.
I can not find a link that lists the specific reasons for the name change but it has been a hot topic of contention on local radio today.
As Gateway Arch Turns 50, Its Message Gets Reframed
The renaming bill was introduced in the REPUBLICAN Senate, and signed by REPUBLICAN President TRUMP.
That's right bitch, I am one of a kind.Jesus. It is like you thin-skinned pseuedocons spend every day looking for a reason to have your feelings hurt.More revisionist history bullshit. Gotta whitewash that American history ya know! And they also said the old name promoted the MYTH of American Exceptionalism.
I can not find a link that lists the specific reasons for the name change but it has been a hot topic of contention on local radio today.
As Gateway Arch Turns 50, Its Message Gets Reframed
The renaming bill was introduced in the REPUBLICAN Senate, and signed by REPUBLICAN President TRUMP.
I think it is pretty clear that the only snowflake we are seeing in this whole thing is Gramps.
That's right bitch, I am one of a kind.Jesus. It is like you thin-skinned pseuedocons spend every day looking for a reason to have your feelings hurt.More revisionist history bullshit. Gotta whitewash that American history ya know! And they also said the old name promoted the MYTH of American Exceptionalism.
I can not find a link that lists the specific reasons for the name change but it has been a hot topic of contention on local radio today.
As Gateway Arch Turns 50, Its Message Gets Reframed
The renaming bill was introduced in the REPUBLICAN Senate, and signed by REPUBLICAN President TRUMP.
I think it is pretty clear that the only snowflake we are seeing in this whole thing is Gramps.
Yes, according to all the woe is me Trump sucks threads it's me wailing and gnashing teeth daily.That's right bitch, I am one of a kind.Jesus. It is like you thin-skinned pseuedocons spend every day looking for a reason to have your feelings hurt.More revisionist history bullshit. Gotta whitewash that American history ya know! And they also said the old name promoted the MYTH of American Exceptionalism.
I can not find a link that lists the specific reasons for the name change but it has been a hot topic of contention on local radio today.
As Gateway Arch Turns 50, Its Message Gets Reframed
The renaming bill was introduced in the REPUBLICAN Senate, and signed by REPUBLICAN President TRUMP.
I think it is pretty clear that the only snowflake we are seeing in this whole thing is Gramps.
a fragile little snowflake- always finding something to be outraged about.
A total hater dupe can't think of anything without Rush and fox on your shoulder...That's right bitch, I am one of a kind.Jesus. It is like you thin-skinned pseuedocons spend every day looking for a reason to have your feelings hurt.More revisionist history bullshit. Gotta whitewash that American history ya know! And they also said the old name promoted the MYTH of American Exceptionalism.
I can not find a link that lists the specific reasons for the name change but it has been a hot topic of contention on local radio today.
As Gateway Arch Turns 50, Its Message Gets Reframed
The renaming bill was introduced in the REPUBLICAN Senate, and signed by REPUBLICAN President TRUMP.
I think it is pretty clear that the only snowflake we are seeing in this whole thing is Gramps.