Judge blocks Trumps EO to end birthright citizenship

[DGS49]

Birthright citizenship IS NOT IN THE CONSTITUTION. It is an interpretation of a couple of words - an interpretation that is totally outside the contemplation of the people who wrote and voted for the Amendment.

No matter which way it goes in court, Trump is performing a public service in bringing it up. Shit, the Lefties won't accept it even if a LAW is passed; we know that, right?

But here is the most important question on the matter: Why is the political Left so supportive of this interpretation? It is obviously BAD FOR AMERICA. It naturalizes people who have no business being here, and in due course, it will keep their illegal parents in the country, at the insistence of Leftist politicians and judges. IT IS BAD FOR THE U.S. So why are Leftists so keen to keep it?????

Seriously. Someone here can answer the question, right?

 

[d0gbreath]

No one needs to change the Constitution the Amendment has been applied incorrectly all of these years without substantive challenge.

It clearly states that being born in America, makes you an American.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Felon 0311 is befuddled about the Constitution.

So far, the courts agree with him.

 

[BrokeLoser]

It’s pretty straight forward if you read the constitution. Guarantee Yrump hasn’t

True…”and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” is pretty straight forward isn’t it? It’s almost like that pesky “shall not be infringed” context you hate huh?
Don’t forget, the SCOTUS has to consider Founder intent to render a ruling….do you really believe even one Justice would render an opinion that reads like this….”I believe our great Founders intended to fuck Americans over and benefit Mexico’s people with 14 section 1.”?
Good real core Americans have the odds in their favor with this 6/3 white conservative Trump court.
Don’t fret, this is what AMERICA FIRST looks like, get ready for years of it…MAGA!!

 

[Hollie]

That's the thing about liberal judges. They're overwhelmingly dipshits.

A judge in democrat crippled Seattle.

Predictable results.

 

[Hollie]

Birthright citizenship IS NOT IN THE CONSTITUTION. It is an interpretation of a couple of words - an interpretation that is totally outside the contemplation of the people who wrote and voted for the Amendment.

No matter which way it goes in court, Trump is performing a public service in bringing it up. Shit, the Lefties won't accept it even if a LAW is passed; we know that, right?

But here is the most important question on the matter: Why is the political Left so supportive of this interpretation? It is obviously BAD FOR AMERICA. It naturalizes people who have no business being here, and in due course, it will keep their illegal parents in the country, at the insistence of Leftist politicians and judges. IT IS BAD FOR THE U.S. So why are Leftists so keen to keep it?????

Seriously. Someone here can answer the question, right?

The leftists will be silent. Bad for America is the goal of the Left.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Not at all true. He was among the very top prior presidents.

The worst President- Lincoln
Second worse- Reagan

Consider this, Lincoln sends ALL slaves home to Africa so they don’t have to live in systemically racist America and Reagan never signs the Amnesty Bill that created this shit-storm at our border and throughout our nation.
Now close your eyes….what does that America look like?

 

[Slade3200]

True…”and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” is pretty straight forward isn’t it? It’s almost like that pesky “shall not be infringed” context you hate huh?
Don’t forget, the SCOTUS has to consider Founder intent to render a ruling….do you really believe even one Justice would render an opinion that reads like this….”I believe our great Founders intended to fuck Americans over and benefit Mexico’s people with 14 section 1.”?
Good real core Americans have the odds in their favor with this 6/3 white conservative Trump court.
Don’t fret, this is what AMERICA FIRST looks like, get ready for years of it…MAGA!!

Jurisdiction to enforce the laws… not take away constitutional rights.

 

[0311]

Birthright citizenship IS NOT IN THE CONSTITUTION. It is an interpretation of a couple of words - an interpretation that is totally outside the contemplation of the people who wrote and voted for the Amendment.

No matter which way it goes in court, Trump is performing a public service in bringing it up. Shit, the Lefties won't accept it even if a LAW is passed; we know that, right?

But here is the most important question on the matter: Why is the political Left so supportive of this interpretation? It is obviously BAD FOR AMERICA. It naturalizes people who have no business being here, and in due course, it will keep their illegal parents in the country, at the insistence of Leftist politicians and judges. IT IS BAD FOR THE U.S. So why are Leftists so keen to keep it?????

Seriously. Someone here can answer the question, right?

Read the Section One of the Fourteenth Amendment asshole!!

 

[wamose]

Birthright citizenship IS NOT IN THE CONSTITUTION. It is an interpretation of a couple of words - an interpretation that is totally outside the contemplation of the people who wrote and voted for the Amendment.

No matter which way it goes in court, Trump is performing a public service in bringing it up. Shit, the Lefties won't accept it even if a LAW is passed; we know that, right?

But here is the most important question on the matter: Why is the political Left so supportive of this interpretation? It is obviously BAD FOR AMERICA. It naturalizes people who have no business being here, and in due course, it will keep their illegal parents in the country, at the insistence of Leftist politicians and judges. IT IS BAD FOR THE U.S. So why are Leftists so keen to keep it?????

Seriously. Someone here can answer the question, right?

The left considers them votes. That's the only reason they encourage illegal immigration. If things changed and the illegals were in favor of Republicans, you'd see Democrats change their tune fast.

 

[BackAgain]

The worst President- Lincoln
Second worse- Reagan

Consider this, Lincoln sends ALL slaves home to Africa so they don’t have to live in systemically racist America and Reagan never signs the Amnesty Bill that created this shit-storm at our border and throughout our nation.
Now close your eyes….what does that America look like?

Lincoln did violate the Constitution. He preserved the Union, though. Great President despite that huge fault.

Reagan was one of the few since Silent Cal to actually discuss the reasoning behind our form of government. Another great President.

 

[BackAgain]

Jurisdiction to enforce the laws… not take away constitutional rights.

It isn’t “taking away” any Constitutional right if that alleged right was never intended for the children born here of illegal aliens.

 

[Slade3200]

Actually, as is so often the sad case, you’re flatly wrong.

Merely reading the words of the 14th Amendment, you chucklehead, isn’t the same as understanding it. You clearly don’t understand it.

Haha, it’s a clearly you that does not understand if you think the president has the right to take away a constitutional right via executive order. That’s laughable

 

[otto105]

Here we go…this will now get interesting as this issue works its way to the high court.

https://www.axios.com/2025/01/23/trump-birthright-citizenship-judge-blocked

Yeah, sure stuuuupid fuckup.

The words of the document are "very clear".

Now put your bagina down and back away.

 

[WorldWatcher]

True…”and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” is pretty straight forward isn’t it? It’s almost like that pesky “shall not be infringed” context you hate huh?
Don’t forget, the SCOTUS has to consider Founder intent to render a ruling….do you really believe even one Justice would render an opinion that reads like this….”I believe our great Founders intended to fuck Americans over and benefit Mexico’s people with 14 section 1.”?
Good real core Americans have the odds in their favor with this 6/3 white conservative Trump court.
Don’t fret, this is what AMERICA FIRST looks like, get ready for years of it…MAGA!!

Psst - Birthright citizenship was the norm since the country was created by the founders.

In the late 1700's there was no limit to immigration, if you came here and had children they were citizens.

(Except for diplomates of foreign countries not under the Jurisdiction of the United States.)

WW

 

[BackAgain]

Haha, it’s a clearly you that does not understand if you think the president has the right to take away a constitutional right via executive order. That’s.

Lol

The EO DOESNT take away any Constitutional right. Instead, you dolt, it seeks to clarify that the 14th does not apply and was never intended to apply to kids born here of illegal alien parents.

“That’s”

You’re a maroon.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Reagan-appointed judge.

 

[WEATHER53]

The Constitution is challenged in the SCOTUS daily…that’s what they do there. You honestly didn’t know that?

Knowledge non existent with this clown show racist

 

[1srelluc]

Meh, a fed court in TX will overturn it and to SCOTUS it will go.....See you again in 2.5 years.

 

[Billiejeens]

It clearly states that being born in America, makes you an American.

It doesn't