Then show me.
Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, where he concedes that the claims that he lied are correct.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Then show me.
I think you are missing the forest for the trees. There were hearings. The Plaintiffs could not produce the evidence to support claims of election fraud. Do you think Fox News would have paid 3/4 of a billion dollars to Dominion if it had evidence of fraud? You really need to take your blinders off.The evidence isn’t used until a trial
The evidence isn’t used until a trial
Actually, and I have no desire to be pedantic here; however, it wasn't just "60 judges". It was over 90 (some courts have multiple judges). And in that 90 was the Supreme Court of the United States of America.....which has 9 sitting Associates.60 judges dismissing evidence
Well, I ain't a lawyer, but......but I'm pretty sure the court needs a preview, a brief, a 'discovery' of what underpins a plaintiff's desire to take up the court's time and resources just so the plaintiff can present an argument.The evidence isn’t used until a trial
All bought off. Yes I accuse them taking moneyActually, and I have no desire to be pedantic here; however, it wasn't just "60 judges". It was over 90 (some courts have multiple judges). And in that 90 was the Supreme Court of the United States of America.....which has 9 sitting Associates.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, I ain't a lawyer, but......but I'm pretty sure the court needs a preview, a brief, a 'discovery' of what underpins a plaintiff's desire to take up the court's time and resources just so the plaintiff can present an argument.
I'm pretty sure it ain't like calling a restaurant for a reservation.
Lest, any nutsocrazo bloke with a beef could wander off the street, pay the filing fee......and make a claim on the judge's time, the clerks time, the bailiff's, and the docket's schedule.
So yeah, I'm pretty doggone sure that some 'evidence' has gotta be either fulsomely described or shown to the judge before he/she would allow it onto their busy docket.
Whatcha think about that issue? Makes sense? Or not?
OK, cool, poster jc456.All bought off. Yes I accuse them taking money
All bought off. Yes I accuse them taking money
Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, where he concedes that the claims that he lied are correct.
So…no rebuttal, just attacks?If you play stupid for too long, you forget to stop.
I accused them.You got ANY evidence to go with that accusation, or is this just the usual bullshit accusations with nothing to back it up.