Kathleen Sebelius: No job loss under Obamacare

Sorry Taz, a deliberate liar would have said something like, "There is/will be no net job loss due to ACA." Omitting the word net is a sign of incompetence.

Or to take a real instance, I have a thread on "Has China Crashed?" MarketWatch and the BBC, both highly respected sources, have very different ratios on total debt to GDP. Since the one with the lower debt ratio, MarketWatch, is the one writing about China using Ponzi financing I am fairly certain it is using Purchasing Power Parity (150+% of computed GDP) and performing loans only to do the computation. The BBC got a debt to GDP ratio for China 2-3 times larger than MarketWatch, it happens.

If this bimbo had a clue as to what the big words she was using meant she would have used the modifier net and probably significant as well so she was being stupid in public again.
 

Forum List

Back
Top