Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What I think and what I can prove are often two different things. I am not a prosecutor, judge or jury.It is ILLEGAL for politicians to have direct influence with or over a Super Pac.
Yeah, we know that. But...you really think these PACs don't coordinate with the candidate's campaigns? Come on. Surely you're not that naive.
What I think and what I can prove are often two different things. I am not a prosecutor, judge or jury.
That's why you don't see me starting threads about Hillary being sent to jail.
I may have my opinions but at the end of the day they remain just my opinions.
As a former felon myself I have an affinity for innocent until proven guilty.
What I think and what I can prove are often two different things. I am not a prosecutor, judge or jury.
So isn't it possible that the line between Super PACs and the candidates they support gets blurred from time to time? I'm not asking whether or not you think it happens, only that it's possible.
That's why you don't see me starting threads about Hillary being sent to jail.
For what? Flynn looks like he's the one going to jail. Manafort too. I'm sure given the "strength of their characters" that they'll roll over on Trump and the rest of the GOP the minute an indictment looks imminent. Manafort and Flynn are cowards and slimebags. They're not going to jail to protect Donald fucking Trump, that's for sure.
Personally, I think they've already rolled on everyone. But the unfortunate thing for them is that I think what they told the investigators was probably what the investigators already knew.
How fucking funny is it going to be when Flynn is the one who ends up behind bars? I think Clinton should go outside his cell and chant "lock him up" over and over.
I may have my opinions but at the end of the day they remain just my opinions.
As a former felon myself I have an affinity for innocent until proven guilty.
When it comes to Conservatives, I don't give the benefit of the doubt. Because I believe them to be inherently bad people.
How do you expect to have an honest conversation with this kind of attitude?.
I'm a left-winger and I thought the Russia hacked the election excuse for Clinton losing a makes democrats look as dumb as the Tea Party. And Hillary isn't a left-winger.
You are a hyper partisan tool.How do you expect to have an honest conversation with this kind of attitude?.
Well let's see:
1. They want to take health care away from 23 million people.
2. They want to make it legal to discriminate against gays
3. They want to kick out 11,000,000 people including 900,000 Dreamers who probably have cleaner records and speak better English than them
4. They want to deny a woman the right to choose what she wants to do with her own body
5. They want to bomb muslims
6. They want to allow corporations to dump pollution into our water supply and belch it out into the air
7. They want to take from the poor and give to the rich
8. They want to let people with records of domestic violence and abuse be able to buy a gun
9. They equate Black Lives Matter with Nazis
10. They defend fascism
11. They defend religious bigotry
So if that doesn't make them bad people, what does?
Is this the topic of this thread?Democrats have a size advantage over Russians.
In Russia...50% of their Women are beautiful and the other 50% look like
they could throw the discus 200'.
The ratio is 10% to 90% with Democrats.
No one more blatantly meddled in the 2016 election than the mayor of londonYes, the US has meddled in such affairs for a long time, that doesn't mean you should sit around and just accept it.
What exactly was the truth....connected to the topic of this thread, which is foreign entities meddling in other countries' affairs....in your post?Is this the topic of this thread?Democrats have a size advantage over Russians.
In Russia...50% of their Women are beautiful and the other 50% look like
they could throw the discus 200'.
The ratio is 10% to 90% with Democrats.
What's wrong Snowflake? Truth hurt?
No one more blatantly meddled in the 2016 election than the mayor of londonYes, the US has meddled in such affairs for a long time, that doesn't mean you should sit around and just accept it.
Left wingers need a crash course in reality. Foreign entities have always meddled in others affairs.Most notably WE HAVE.
Analysis | The long history of the U.S. interfering with elections elsewhere
Russia's attempts to influence our elections is not a surprise. It's nothing new. It also has nothing to do with our sitting president. The attempts would have taken place no matter who the nominees were.
An intelligent person could easily conclude that their actions were a direct result of our attempts to meddle in the Ukraine.
An unintelligent person believes that it's because of or attributed to Trump.
You're welcome. It's clear that you need to be bottle fed however. I used a spoon and you still missed 80% of the point of the post.Left wingers need a crash course in reality. Foreign entities have always meddled in others affairs.Most notably WE HAVE.
Analysis | The long history of the U.S. interfering with elections elsewhere
Russia's attempts to influence our elections is not a surprise. It's nothing new. It also has nothing to do with our sitting president. The attempts would have taken place no matter who the nominees were.
An intelligent person could easily conclude that their actions were a direct result of our attempts to meddle in the Ukraine.
An unintelligent person believes that it's because of or attributed to Trump.
Oh, well, thanks for clearing that up for us. Thanks for letting us know it's OK and all right. To be expected and we should just accept it. Got it!
2. Russia most definitely hacked our election, and the State Department spokesperson even said so today.
3. Russia hacked not only the servers of the political opponents of their Republican comrades, but also the voting systems of at least 21 states including WI, PA, and MI.
Reagan got away with giving Iran weapons for holding US hostages to destroy Carter in election.Left wingers need a crash course in reality. Foreign entities have always meddled in others affairs.Most notably WE HAVE.
Analysis | The long history of the U.S. interfering with elections elsewhere
Russia's attempts to influence our elections is not a surprise. It's nothing new. It also has nothing to do with our sitting president. The attempts would have taken place no matter who the nominees were.
An intelligent person could easily conclude that their actions were a direct result of our attempts to meddle in the Ukraine.
An unintelligent person believes that it's because of or attributed to Trump.
Oh, well, thanks for clearing that up for us. Thanks for letting us know it's OK and all right. To be expected and we should just accept it. Got it!
good storyNo one more blatantly meddled in the 2016 election than the mayor of londonYes, the US has meddled in such affairs for a long time, that doesn't mean you should sit around and just accept it.
Actually the reverse seems to be true, the US, especially the right, seemed to drag the Mayor of London into the election simply because he's a Muslim. He says stuff and the US listens because he's a Muslim, had he not been, he'd have been ignored. People looking to demonize all Muslims, use the Mayor.
Like last week when he was accused of not condemning Radical Islam because he didn't say "radical Islam" therefore he must be pro-Islamic extremism. But then I showed how the Prime Minister said basically the same thing as him.
