Leftards Tear Down US Grant Statue

[Weatherman2020]

These fools are history challenged

Another sad prime example of public education fail.

Fools in Great Britain tried to take down a Abraham Lincoln statue. I guess they've never heard of the Emancipation Proclamation

Or they know exactly what they are doing, and any sin against current orthodoxy equals being declared an unperson.

Grant married a slave owning woman? Down with Grant
Lincoln was slow in emancipating the slaves? Down with Lincoln
Statue is of some white guy even if he was an abolitionist? Who cares, take it down anyway.

Well, he did own a personal servant, a slave he bought, who he freed a couple years before the war. If we're going to repeat the history, let's repeat the whole thing, please. People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue. But imo they ought to get the bill, too.

Grant also worked with them in the fields, free a man

Myths & Misunderstandings | Grant as a slaveholder
LINK

Excerpt:

"Finding farming less lucrative than he’d hoped, Grant asked his father for a loan. Jesse Grant reportedly replied, “Ulysses, when you are ready to come North I will give you a start, but so long as you make your home among a tribe of slave-owners I will do nothing.”

After the death of Julia’s mother, the Grant family left “Hardscrabble” and moved to her father’s farm, “White Haven,” which Grant managed from 1854-1859. Novelist Hamlin Garland, an early biographer who spoke with Grant’s Missouri neighbors, wrote,

“The use of slaves on the farm…was a source of irritation and shame to Grant. Jefferson Sapington told me that he and Grant used to work in the fields with the blacks. He said with glee, ‘Grant was helpless when it came to making slaves work,’ and Mrs. Boggs corroborated this. ‘He was no hand to manage negroes,’she said. ‘He couldn’t force them to do anything. He wouldn’t whip them. He was too gentle and good tempered and besides he was not a slavery man.’”

Whether or not Grant wasn’t a “slavery man” by inclination, we know he briefly owned William Jones. He does not mention Jones in his memoirs or other writings, so the exact nature of their relationship remains a mystery. We do know that in March 1859 Grant filed the following manumission document."

And while his slave was worth $1,000 in 1859 dollars, and Grant was broke, he granted him his legal freedom instead of selling him.

 

[OldLady]

These fools are history challenged

Another sad prime example of public education fail.

Fools in Great Britain tried to take down a Abraham Lincoln statue. I guess they've never heard of the Emancipation Proclamation

Or they know exactly what they are doing, and any sin against current orthodoxy equals being declared an unperson.

Grant married a slave owning woman? Down with Grant
Lincoln was slow in emancipating the slaves? Down with Lincoln
Statue is of some white guy even if he was an abolitionist? Who cares, take it down anyway.

Well, he did own a personal servant, a slave he bought, who he freed a couple years before the war. If we're going to repeat the history, let's repeat the whole thing, please. People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue. But imo they ought to get the bill, too.

So mobs can decide what gets destroyed?
What an f’kd up person you are.

I don't agree with it, no. I never said they did. It's so hard being on a message board with semi-illiterates.

Learn to write then.
“ People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue.”

This is the same bullshit you folks pulled when the anti-Muslim thing was raging here a few years ago. Anyone who would not immediately profess that they should all be shot or deported because they are all violent scum was immediately branded a Muzzie lover.

Try to cope with the fact that a neutral statement is not necessarily a statement supporting or damning either side. It's called an observation.

Still hoping you eventually grow some more gray matter in the frontal cortex. It's never too late, they say.

 

[Weatherman2020]

These fools are history challenged

Another sad prime example of public education fail.

Fools in Great Britain tried to take down a Abraham Lincoln statue. I guess they've never heard of the Emancipation Proclamation

Or they know exactly what they are doing, and any sin against current orthodoxy equals being declared an unperson.

Grant married a slave owning woman? Down with Grant
Lincoln was slow in emancipating the slaves? Down with Lincoln
Statue is of some white guy even if he was an abolitionist? Who cares, take it down anyway.

Well, he did own a personal servant, a slave he bought, who he freed a couple years before the war. If we're going to repeat the history, let's repeat the whole thing, please. People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue. But imo they ought to get the bill, too.

So mobs can decide what gets destroyed?
What an f’kd up person you are.

I don't agree with it, no. I never said they did. It's so hard being on a message board with semi-illiterates.

Learn to write then.
“ People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue.”

This is the same bullshit you folks pulled when the anti-Muslim thing was raging here a few years ago. Anyone who would not immediately profess that they should all be shot or deported because they are all violent scum was immediately branded a Muzzie lover.

Try to cope with the fact that a neutral statement is not necessarily a statement supporting or damning either side. It's called an observation.

Still hoping you eventually grow some more gray matter in the frontal cortex. It's never too late, they say.

Saying people can determine what they want to tear down is not a neutral statement.
Learn English.

 

[martybegan]

These fools are history challenged

Another sad prime example of public education fail.

Fools in Great Britain tried to take down a Abraham Lincoln statue. I guess they've never heard of the Emancipation Proclamation

Or they know exactly what they are doing, and any sin against current orthodoxy equals being declared an unperson.

Grant married a slave owning woman? Down with Grant
Lincoln was slow in emancipating the slaves? Down with Lincoln
Statue is of some white guy even if he was an abolitionist? Who cares, take it down anyway.

Well, he did own a personal servant, a slave he bought, who he freed a couple years before the war. If we're going to repeat the history, let's repeat the whole thing, please. People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue. But imo they ought to get the bill, too.

There is NO good reason to pull down Statues in the US, it's breaking the law.

No one is stopping them.

Because they know to do this in mostly blue/democrat controlled cities.

Most dems agree in part with a socialist agenda, so they don't see the anti-fa types as a threat, but as an ally that can do their dirty work for them while they remain "clean"

 

[martybegan]

These fools are history challenged

Another sad prime example of public education fail.

Fools in Great Britain tried to take down a Abraham Lincoln statue. I guess they've never heard of the Emancipation Proclamation

Or they know exactly what they are doing, and any sin against current orthodoxy equals being declared an unperson.

Grant married a slave owning woman? Down with Grant
Lincoln was slow in emancipating the slaves? Down with Lincoln
Statue is of some white guy even if he was an abolitionist? Who cares, take it down anyway.

Well, he did own a personal servant, a slave he bought, who he freed a couple years before the war. If we're going to repeat the history, let's repeat the whole thing, please. People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue. But imo they ought to get the bill, too.

So mobs can decide what gets destroyed?
What an f’kd up person you are.

I don't agree with it, no. I never said they did. It's so hard being on a message board with semi-illiterates.

Learn to write then.
“ People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue.”

This is the same bullshit you folks pulled when the anti-Muslim thing was raging here a few years ago. Anyone who would not immediately profess that they should all be shot or deported because they are all violent scum was immediately branded a Muzzie lover.

Try to cope with the fact that a neutral statement is not necessarily a statement supporting or damning either side. It's called an observation.

Still hoping you eventually grow some more gray matter in the frontal cortex. It's never too late, they say.

Just remember trying to stand in the middle of the road on the double yellow line may look safe, but it is a good way to get hit by traffic going in both directions.

 

[OldLady]

These fools are history challenged

Another sad prime example of public education fail.

Fools in Great Britain tried to take down a Abraham Lincoln statue. I guess they've never heard of the Emancipation Proclamation

Or they know exactly what they are doing, and any sin against current orthodoxy equals being declared an unperson.

Grant married a slave owning woman? Down with Grant
Lincoln was slow in emancipating the slaves? Down with Lincoln
Statue is of some white guy even if he was an abolitionist? Who cares, take it down anyway.

Well, he did own a personal servant, a slave he bought, who he freed a couple years before the war. If we're going to repeat the history, let's repeat the whole thing, please. People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue. But imo they ought to get the bill, too.

So mobs can decide what gets destroyed?
What an f’kd up person you are.

I don't agree with it, no. I never said they did. It's so hard being on a message board with semi-illiterates.

Learn to write then.
“ People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue.”

This is the same bullshit you folks pulled when the anti-Muslim thing was raging here a few years ago. Anyone who would not immediately profess that they should all be shot or deported because they are all violent scum was immediately branded a Muzzie lover.

Try to cope with the fact that a neutral statement is not necessarily a statement supporting or damning either side. It's called an observation.

Still hoping you eventually grow some more gray matter in the frontal cortex. It's never too late, they say.

Saying people can determine what they want to tear down is not a neutral statement.
Learn English.

Read the whole comment. People can DECIDE IF THAT IS A GOOD REASON. I was referring to the fact that Grant did indeed own a slave for a bit. Maybe the people who pulled down the statue did it for that reason, not because they didn't know who he was. I refuse to put my own opinion in here just to satisfy you. I've voiced it elsewhere. But you're not going to bully it out of me.
Fuck off.

 

[OldLady]

These fools are history challenged

Another sad prime example of public education fail.

Fools in Great Britain tried to take down a Abraham Lincoln statue. I guess they've never heard of the Emancipation Proclamation

Or they know exactly what they are doing, and any sin against current orthodoxy equals being declared an unperson.

Grant married a slave owning woman? Down with Grant
Lincoln was slow in emancipating the slaves? Down with Lincoln
Statue is of some white guy even if he was an abolitionist? Who cares, take it down anyway.

Well, he did own a personal servant, a slave he bought, who he freed a couple years before the war. If we're going to repeat the history, let's repeat the whole thing, please. People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue. But imo they ought to get the bill, too.

So mobs can decide what gets destroyed?
What an f’kd up person you are.

I don't agree with it, no. I never said they did. It's so hard being on a message board with semi-illiterates.

Learn to write then.
“ People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue.”

This is the same bullshit you folks pulled when the anti-Muslim thing was raging here a few years ago. Anyone who would not immediately profess that they should all be shot or deported because they are all violent scum was immediately branded a Muzzie lover.

Try to cope with the fact that a neutral statement is not necessarily a statement supporting or damning either side. It's called an observation.

Still hoping you eventually grow some more gray matter in the frontal cortex. It's never too late, they say.

Just remember trying to stand in the middle of the road on the double yellow line may look safe, but it is a good way to get hit by traffic going in both directions.I

I'm used to it.

 

[martybegan]

These fools are history challenged

Another sad prime example of public education fail.

Fools in Great Britain tried to take down a Abraham Lincoln statue. I guess they've never heard of the Emancipation Proclamation

Or they know exactly what they are doing, and any sin against current orthodoxy equals being declared an unperson.

Grant married a slave owning woman? Down with Grant
Lincoln was slow in emancipating the slaves? Down with Lincoln
Statue is of some white guy even if he was an abolitionist? Who cares, take it down anyway.

Well, he did own a personal servant, a slave he bought, who he freed a couple years before the war. If we're going to repeat the history, let's repeat the whole thing, please. People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue. But imo they ought to get the bill, too.

So mobs can decide what gets destroyed?
What an f’kd up person you are.

I don't agree with it, no. I never said they did. It's so hard being on a message board with semi-illiterates.

Learn to write then.
“ People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue.”

This is the same bullshit you folks pulled when the anti-Muslim thing was raging here a few years ago. Anyone who would not immediately profess that they should all be shot or deported because they are all violent scum was immediately branded a Muzzie lover.

Try to cope with the fact that a neutral statement is not necessarily a statement supporting or damning either side. It's called an observation.

Still hoping you eventually grow some more gray matter in the frontal cortex. It's never too late, they say.

Just remember trying to stand in the middle of the road on the double yellow line may look safe, but it is a good way to get hit by traffic going in both directions.I

I'm used to it.

So you are OK with mobs ripping down property and not suffering for it?

 

[Marion Morrison]

In Louisiana they vandalized a Joan of Arc statue. In DC they attacked a memorial to Tadeusz Kościuszko. The Democrats have followed through their threat to unleash barbarians on us. Barbarians who don’t know one memorial from another but do know that civilized people build memorials.

That looks about like the gist of it.

 

[Marion Morrison]

These fools are history challenged

Another sad prime example of public education fail.

Fools in Great Britain tried to take down a Abraham Lincoln statue. I guess they've never heard of the Emancipation Proclamation

Or they know exactly what they are doing, and any sin against current orthodoxy equals being declared an unperson.

Grant married a slave owning woman? Down with Grant
Lincoln was slow in emancipating the slaves? Down with Lincoln
Statue is of some white guy even if he was an abolitionist? Who cares, take it down anyway.

Well, he did own a personal servant, a slave he bought, who he freed a couple years before the war. If we're going to repeat the history, let's repeat the whole thing, please. People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue. But imo they ought to get the bill, too.

So mobs can decide what gets destroyed?
What an f’kd up person you are.

I don't agree with it, no. I never said they did. It's so hard being on a message board with semi-illiterates.

Learn to write then.
“ People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue.”

This is the same bullshit you folks pulled when the anti-Muslim thing was raging here a few years ago. Anyone who would not immediately profess that they should all be shot or deported because they are all violent scum was immediately branded a Muzzie lover.

Try to cope with the fact that a neutral statement is not necessarily a statement supporting or damning either side. It's called an observation.

Still hoping you eventually grow some more gray matter in the frontal cortex. It's never too late, they say.

Saying people can determine what they want to tear down is not a neutral statement.
Learn English.

Read the whole comment. People can DECIDE IF THAT IS A GOOD REASON. I was referring to the fact that Grant did indeed own a slave for a bit. Maybe the people who pulled down the statue did it for that reason, not because they didn't know who he was. I refuse to put my own opinion in here just to satisfy you. I've voiced it elsewhere. But you're not going to bully it out of me.
Fuck off.

OldLady's a lot tougher than she comes off as at times.
You already got her to cuss, she's about to be not nice.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

I've been saying from the very beginning that I was against tearing down Confederate statues and removing Confederate flags, not because I'm a southerner and have any connection with them, but because I knew it wouldn't end there and that we'd start seeing statues and memorials of all sorts of historical figures being taken down. Look what's happening.

This is no longer about the Civil War or Confederate military and political leaders; it has become a purge of the history and memory of any white historical figure.

Statue of FDR in DC remains untouched. I guess going after Americans of Asian decent and Jews is acceptable in Leftardia.

Give it time. I've no doubt that one will come down too.

Nope. He’s a Democrat hero. This is all about politics.

I don't think that even matters at this point. They have gained traction and momentum and and they are now on autopilot. There is no rationale, reason or logic to their actions anymore. If there ever was.

The thinking process of these people is: If this is racist, what else is? They are not attacking racism where they see it, they are actively seeking it out. And as we all know, if you go looking for racism, you'll find it, even if it's not there.

 

[Weatherman2020]

These fools are history challenged

Another sad prime example of public education fail.

Fools in Great Britain tried to take down a Abraham Lincoln statue. I guess they've never heard of the Emancipation Proclamation

Or they know exactly what they are doing, and any sin against current orthodoxy equals being declared an unperson.

Grant married a slave owning woman? Down with Grant
Lincoln was slow in emancipating the slaves? Down with Lincoln
Statue is of some white guy even if he was an abolitionist? Who cares, take it down anyway.

Well, he did own a personal servant, a slave he bought, who he freed a couple years before the war. If we're going to repeat the history, let's repeat the whole thing, please. People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue. But imo they ought to get the bill, too.

So mobs can decide what gets destroyed?
What an f’kd up person you are.

I don't agree with it, no. I never said they did. It's so hard being on a message board with semi-illiterates.

Learn to write then.
“ People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue.”

This is the same bullshit you folks pulled when the anti-Muslim thing was raging here a few years ago. Anyone who would not immediately profess that they should all be shot or deported because they are all violent scum was immediately branded a Muzzie lover.

Try to cope with the fact that a neutral statement is not necessarily a statement supporting or damning either side. It's called an observation.

Still hoping you eventually grow some more gray matter in the frontal cortex. It's never too late, they say.

Saying people can determine what they want to tear down is not a neutral statement.
Learn English.

Read the whole comment. People can DECIDE IF THAT IS A GOOD REASON. I was referring to the fact that Grant did indeed own a slave for a bit. Maybe the people who pulled down the statue did it for that reason, not because they didn't know who he was. I refuse to put my own opinion in here just to satisfy you. I've voiced it elsewhere. But you're not going to bully it out of me.
Fuck off.

Mobs always think they have good reason, shitforbrains. There’s a legal process and you Leftards are in full anti-civilization mode. So FU.

 

[OldLady]

These fools are history challenged

Another sad prime example of public education fail.

Fools in Great Britain tried to take down a Abraham Lincoln statue. I guess they've never heard of the Emancipation Proclamation

Or they know exactly what they are doing, and any sin against current orthodoxy equals being declared an unperson.

Grant married a slave owning woman? Down with Grant
Lincoln was slow in emancipating the slaves? Down with Lincoln
Statue is of some white guy even if he was an abolitionist? Who cares, take it down anyway.

Well, he did own a personal servant, a slave he bought, who he freed a couple years before the war. If we're going to repeat the history, let's repeat the whole thing, please. People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue. But imo they ought to get the bill, too.

So mobs can decide what gets destroyed?
What an f’kd up person you are.

I don't agree with it, no. I never said they did. It's so hard being on a message board with semi-illiterates.

Learn to write then.
“ People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue.”

This is the same bullshit you folks pulled when the anti-Muslim thing was raging here a few years ago. Anyone who would not immediately profess that they should all be shot or deported because they are all violent scum was immediately branded a Muzzie lover.

Try to cope with the fact that a neutral statement is not necessarily a statement supporting or damning either side. It's called an observation.

Still hoping you eventually grow some more gray matter in the frontal cortex. It's never too late, they say.

Saying people can determine what they want to tear down is not a neutral statement.
Learn English.

Read the whole comment. People can DECIDE IF THAT IS A GOOD REASON. I was referring to the fact that Grant did indeed own a slave for a bit. Maybe the people who pulled down the statue did it for that reason, not because they didn't know who he was. I refuse to put my own opinion in here just to satisfy you. I've voiced it elsewhere. But you're not going to bully it out of me.
Fuck off.

Mobs always think they have good reason, shitforbrains. There’s a legal process and you Leftards are in full anti-civilization mode. So FU.

 

[Weatherman2020]

These fools are history challenged

Another sad prime example of public education fail.

Fools in Great Britain tried to take down a Abraham Lincoln statue. I guess they've never heard of the Emancipation Proclamation

Or they know exactly what they are doing, and any sin against current orthodoxy equals being declared an unperson.

Grant married a slave owning woman? Down with Grant
Lincoln was slow in emancipating the slaves? Down with Lincoln
Statue is of some white guy even if he was an abolitionist? Who cares, take it down anyway.

Well, he did own a personal servant, a slave he bought, who he freed a couple years before the war. If we're going to repeat the history, let's repeat the whole thing, please. People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue. But imo they ought to get the bill, too.

So mobs can decide what gets destroyed?
What an f’kd up person you are.

I don't agree with it, no. I never said they did. It's so hard being on a message board with semi-illiterates.

Learn to write then.
“ People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue.”

This is the same bullshit you folks pulled when the anti-Muslim thing was raging here a few years ago. Anyone who would not immediately profess that they should all be shot or deported because they are all violent scum was immediately branded a Muzzie lover.

Try to cope with the fact that a neutral statement is not necessarily a statement supporting or damning either side. It's called an observation.

Still hoping you eventually grow some more gray matter in the frontal cortex. It's never too late, they say.

Saying people can determine what they want to tear down is not a neutral statement.
Learn English.

Read the whole comment. People can DECIDE IF THAT IS A GOOD REASON. I was referring to the fact that Grant did indeed own a slave for a bit. Maybe the people who pulled down the statue did it for that reason, not because they didn't know who he was. I refuse to put my own opinion in here just to satisfy you. I've voiced it elsewhere. But you're not going to bully it out of me.
Fuck off.

Mobs always think they have good reason, shitforbrains. There’s a legal process and you Leftards are in full anti-civilization mode. So FU.

View attachment 352701

Now try learning to write English. If you don’t think mobs should determine what to destroy don’t write it.

 

[Picaro]

Because they know to do this in mostly blue/democrat controlled cities.

Most dems agree in part with a socialist agenda, so they don't see the anti-fa types as a threat, but as an ally that can do their dirty work for them while they remain "clean"

Yes, the 'protestors' and the 'looters' are all the same Democrat funded street gangs, same as the Irish Sinn Fein and the Commie sect of the IRA are one and the same, and Hezbollah and the Iranian govt. are one and the same.

 

[22lcidw]

These fools are history challenged

Another sad prime example of public education fail.

Fools in Great Britain tried to take down a Abraham Lincoln statue. I guess they've never heard of the Emancipation Proclamation

Or they know exactly what they are doing, and any sin against current orthodoxy equals being declared an unperson.

Grant married a slave owning woman? Down with Grant
Lincoln was slow in emancipating the slaves? Down with Lincoln
Statue is of some white guy even if he was an abolitionist? Who cares, take it down anyway.

Well, he did own a personal servant, a slave he bought, who he freed a couple years before the war. If we're going to repeat the history, let's repeat the whole thing, please. People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue. But imo they ought to get the bill, too.

So mobs can decide what gets destroyed?
What an f’kd up person you are.

I don't agree with it, no. I never said they did. It's so hard being on a message board with semi-illiterates.

Learn to write then.
“ People can decide if that is a good reason to pull down his statue.”

This is the same bullshit you folks pulled when the anti-Muslim thing was raging here a few years ago. Anyone who would not immediately profess that they should all be shot or deported because they are all violent scum was immediately branded a Muzzie lover.

Try to cope with the fact that a neutral statement is not necessarily a statement supporting or damning either side. It's called an observation.

Still hoping you eventually grow some more gray matter in the frontal cortex. It's never too late, they say.

So millions of more weapons being purchased does not bother you? It seems many people are using their gray matter and see that this is not being controlled. Our government if it want s to continue as it is, better start making decisions to defend its citizens.