🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Leftwing Fascists Hijack a Trump Student Support Group

Leftwing Marxists like the Black Lies Matter fools cant be happy if they think that three white male Trump supporters are having a meeting somewhere on campus.

roflmao. When will these naive college boys realize that you have to have some scary people around to keep things organized?

Shut Down: Portland State Black Lives Matter Takes Over Students for Trump Event - Breitbart
Another Con who doesn't know what a Fascist is.

I know exactly what a fascist is, dude. Fascism is a leftwing menace that evolved from the Milan Marxists in the person of Mussolini.
Benito Mussolini - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
With the outbreak of World War I a number of socialist parties initially supported the war when it began in August 1914.[36] Once the war began, Austrian, British, French, German, and Russian socialists followed the rising nationalist current by supporting their country's intervention in the war.[37] The outbreak of the war had resulted in a surge of Italian nationalism and the war was supported by a variety of political factions. One of the most prominent and popular Italian nationalist supporters of the war was Gabriele d'Annunzio who promoted Italian irredentism and helped sway the Italian public to support intervention in the war.[38] The Italian Liberal Party under the leadership of Paolo Boselli promoted intervention in the war on the side of the Allies and utilized theSocietà Dante Alighieri to promote Italian nationalism.[39][40] Italian socialists were divided on whether to support the war or oppose it.[41] Prior to Mussolini taking a position on the war, a number of revolutionary syndicalists had announced their support of intervention, including Alceste De Ambris, Filippo Corridoni, and Angelo Oliviero Olivetti.[42] The Italian Socialist Party decided to oppose the war after anti-militarist protestors had been killed, resulting in a general strike called Red Week.[43]

Mussolini initially held official support for the party's decision and, in an August 1914 article, Mussolini wrote "Down with the War. We remain neutral."[44] He saw the war as an opportunity, both for his own ambitions as well as those of socialists and Italians.[44] He was influenced by anti-Austrian Italian nationalist sentiments, believing that the war offered Italians in Austria-Hungary the chance to liberate themselves from rule of the Habsburgs.[44] He eventually decided to declare support for the war by appealing to the need for socialists to overthrow the Hohenzollern and Habsburg monarchies in Germany and Austria-Hungary who he claimed had consistently repressed socialism.[44] He further justified his position by denouncing the Central Powers for being reactionary powers; for pursuing imperialist designs against Belgium and Serbia as well as historically against Denmark, France, and against Italians, since hundreds of thousands of Italians were under Habsburg rule.[42]He claimed that the fall of Hohenzollern and Habsburg monarchies and the repression of "reactionary" Turkey would create conditions beneficial for the working class.[42] While he was supportive of the Entente powers, Mussolini responded to the conservative nature of Tsarist Russia by claiming that the mobilization required for the war would undermine Russia's reactionary authoritarianism and the war would bring Russia to social revolution.[42] He claimed that for Italy the war would complete the process of Risorgimento by uniting the Italians in Austria-Hungary into Italy and by allowing the common people of Italy to be participating members of the Italian nation in what would be Italy's first national war.[42] Thus he claimed that the vast social changes that the war could offer meant that it should be supported as a revolutionary war.[42]

As Mussolini's support for the intervention solidified, he came into conflict with socialists who opposed the war. He attacked the opponents of the war and claimed that those proletarians who supported pacifism were out of step with the proletarians who had joined the rising interventionist vanguard that was preparing Italy for a revolutionary war.[45] He began to criticize the Italian Socialist Party and socialism itself for having failed to recognize the national problems that had led to the outbreak of the war.[45] He was expelled from the party due to his support of intervention.


Hitler too was a socialist and nationalist and modeled his Nazi party on Italian fascism, meaning that the Nazis too were leftwing socialists.

The only significant difference between a fascist and leftwing socialists of old was the issue of nationalism. The Democratic Party today has moved ever furhter leftward and they espouse an Identity Politics that is grounded in a racist view of people, only in this case they are anti-White instead of pro-white.

Further, todays liberals further mimic fascism in their intolerance for dissent or any opposition, their abuse of the democratic system to support authoritarian leaders who rule by decree like Obama, place Nature above the interests of mankind and generally consider humanity a blight upon the planet, and also promote abortion for the 'unfit' minorities.

HitlerSocialist_zps0vrvy1ji.jpg


Makes you wonder....which came first, the nazi party platform.....or the democrat party platform in 2016.............since they are one and the same.......
 
John Birch Society nonsense is fascist nonsense.

It is uber nationalist, it is racist, it is nativist, it is authoritarian.

JBS is the dark side of America.
 
'left wing' 'marxists' 'fascists'

The last term defines JimBowie and those who think like him.

He has no idea what any of them mean.
And here comes Fakey to defend the BLM movement.................after they take a shit on Free Speech...........Typical paid Liberal poster.
 
'left wing' 'marxists' 'fascists'

The last term defines JimBowie and those who think like him.

He has no idea what any of them mean.
And here comes Fakey to defend the BLM movement.................after they take a shit on Free Speech...........Typical paid Liberal poster.
Those are your words, eagle, not mine. You TPM are the BLM equivalent of the far right. America opposes BLM, TPM, fascists, and JBS. You fit the last three parameters, eagle, and you won't get your way.
 
These little commie camps called, colleges and Universities are producing a bunch of radical unmannered loud mouthed jerks. If my kid was amongst those I would have kicked their ass.


the radicals of today are called, Activist and they are free to do anything they want to OTHERS.

their motto:
Free speech for thee but not for ANYONE else. and we can barge into anyplace we feel it because it will be Excused as: their way of "protesting"

but you try and film them they have teachers calling for Muscle to help throw them out.
 
Yes.....since we have a lot of left wing regressives on U.S. message board.......I will repeat the definition of fascism......it takes them a while to understand the truth, facts and reality (Really, they never do....but we can always hope.)

Fascism: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics | Library of Economics and Liberty

As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. The word derives from fasces, the Roman symbol of collectivism and power: a tied bundle of rods with a protruding ax. In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie.
Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism.

Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society’s economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners.

Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their property in the “national interest”—that is, as the autocratic authority conceived it. (Nevertheless, a few industries were operated by the state.)

Where socialism abolished all market relations outright, fascism left the appearance of market relations while planning all economic activities. Where socialism abolished money and prices, fascism controlled the monetary system and set all prices and wages politically.

In doing all this, fascism denatured the marketplace.Entrepreneurship was abolished. State ministries, rather than consumers, determined what was produced and under what conditions.
 
2aguy is quoting the discredited John Birch Society rag.

America hates the JBS.


Since you are one of the slowest posters here on U.S......here it is again....

Fascism: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics | Library of Economics and Liberty

As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. The word derives from fasces, the Roman symbol of collectivism and power: a tied bundle of rods with a protruding ax. In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie.
Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism.

Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society’s economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners.

Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their property in the “national interest”—that is, as the autocratic authority conceived it. (Nevertheless, a few industries were operated by the state.)
Where socialism abolished all market relations outright, fascism left the appearance of market relations while planning all economic activities. Where socialism abolished money and prices, fascism controlled the monetary system and set all prices and wages politically.

In doing all this, fascism denatured the marketplace.Entrepreneurship was abolished. State ministries, rather than consumers, determined what was produced and under what conditions.
 
Now you are spamming JBS material. Your only warning. You posted that crap before.


I'm not spamming anything asswipe....and thanks for the warning..........just to show I care about your education in the truth, the facts and reality......I think you should really understand what fascism is..........

Mod edit: We don't need it posted three times. Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Want to invest in a growth opportunity?

Little company in Maine that is the sole-surviving maker of jackboots. We're gonna need tons of them if we're ever gonna get the liberal-loon population under control.

Get yours before the shortage and price increases.....
 
How stupid are you? You have been told not to spam. The definition is from a JBS site, so completely out of the mainstream of reality. Give it up, 2aguy.


And of course you are lying........here is the founder of the economic website where the definition was found...

Pierre F. Goodrich - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pierre Frist Goodrich was born on September 10, 1894, in Winchester, Indiana.[1] His father was James P. Goodrich, a successful businessman and the Republican Governor of Indiana from 1917 to 1921.[1] He attended Wabash College and Harvard Law School.[1][2][3]

He worked as a lawyer in Indianapolis, Indiana.[1] He later took over his father's concerns, including the Indiana Telephone Company, Peoples Loan and Trust, and the Ayrshire Collieries Corporation.[1][2][3]

He served on the Boards of Trustees of the Great Books Foundation, the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra, the China Institute, the Intercollegiate Society of Individualists, theFoundation for Economic Education, and the Institute for Humane Studies.[1] He was a member of the Mont Pelerin Society.[1] He served on the Board of Trustees of his alma mater, Wabash College, from 1940 to 1969.[1][2] As trustee, he advocated the Great Books curriculum popularized by Mortimer J. Adler and Robert Maynard Hutchins, which the school adopted in 1946.[2] He also built the Goodrich Seminar Room in Wabash’s main library, dedicated to liberty.[2][4] However, he subsequently grew weary of the school's move towards an embrace of counterculture of the 1960s.[2]

In the 1950s, he established two foundations to promote liberty, the Winchester Foundation and Thirty Five Twenty.[1] In 1960, he founded the Liberty Fund, a free-market think tank headquartered in Indianapolis.[1][3] He wrote Liberty Fund Basic Memorandum, a 129-page booklet with instructions on how to run the think tank.[2][3]

In 1973, LibertyPress published Goodrich's essay "Education in a Free Society," co-authored with Benjamin A. Rogge.[5]
 
How stupid are you? You have been told not to spam. The definition is from a JBS site, so completely out of the mainstream of reality. Give it up, 2aguy.


And here...more about fascism......


Under fascism, the state, through official cartels, controlled all aspects of manufacturing, commerce, finance, and agriculture. Planning boards set product lines, production levels, prices, wages, working conditions, and the size of firms. Licensing was ubiquitous; no economic activity could be undertaken without government permission. Levels of consumption were dictated by the state, and “excess” incomes had to be surrendered as taxes or “loans.” The consequent burdening of manufacturers gave advantages to foreign firms wishing to export. But since government policy aimed at autarky, or national self-sufficiency, protectionism was necessary: imports were barred or strictly controlled, leaving foreign conquest as the only avenue for access to resources unavailable domestically. Fascism was thus incompatible with peace and the international division of labor—hallmarks of liberalism.

Fascism embodied corporatism, in which political representation was based on trade and industry rather than on geography.

In this, fascism revealed its roots in syndicalism, a form of socialism originating on the left.

The government cartelized firms of the same industry, with representatives of labor and management serving on myriad local, regional, and national boards—subject always to the final authority of the dictator’s economic plan. Corporatism was intended to avert unsettling divisions within the nation, such as lockouts and union strikes. The price of such forced “harmony” was the loss of the ability to bargain and move about freely.
 
How stupid are you? You have been told not to spam. The definition is from a JBS site, so completely out of the mainstream of reality. Give it up, 2aguy.


And of course you are lying........here is the founder of the economic website where the definition was found...

Pierre F. Goodrich - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pierre Frist Goodrich was born on September 10, 1894, in Winchester, Indiana.[1] His father was James P. Goodrich, a successful businessman and the Republican Governor of Indiana from 1917 to 1921.[1] He attended Wabash College and Harvard Law School.[1][2][3]

He worked as a lawyer in Indianapolis, Indiana.[1] He later took over his father's concerns, including the Indiana Telephone Company, Peoples Loan and Trust, and the Ayrshire Collieries Corporation.[1][2][3]

He served on the Boards of Trustees of the Great Books Foundation, the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra, the China Institute, the Intercollegiate Society of Individualists, theFoundation for Economic Education, and the Institute for Humane Studies.[1] He was a member of the Mont Pelerin Society.[1] He served on the Board of Trustees of his alma mater, Wabash College, from 1940 to 1969.[1][2] As trustee, he advocated the Great Books curriculum popularized by Mortimer J. Adler and Robert Maynard Hutchins, which the school adopted in 1946.[2] He also built the Goodrich Seminar Room in Wabash’s main library, dedicated to liberty.[2][4] However, he subsequently grew weary of the school's move towards an embrace of counterculture of the 1960s.[2]

In the 1950s, he established two foundations to promote liberty, the Winchester Foundation and Thirty Five Twenty.[1] In 1960, he founded the Liberty Fund, a free-market think tank headquartered in Indianapolis.[1][3] He wrote Liberty Fund Basic Memorandum, a 129-page booklet with instructions on how to run the think tank.[2][3]

In 1973, LibertyPress published Goodrich's essay "Education in a Free Society," co-authored with Benjamin A. Rogge.[5]
All of which is JBS related.
 
And you are all going to be crying foul when the American public rejects you, yet once again.
 

Forum List

Back
Top